NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR10502 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 §. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 HCG Docket No. CONCLUSION Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective action.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1053 14
COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 VDOCKE } = 14 i } 7 i IN Kec ra om >) at WH oe» C e names TE Or UAE eT { = + + adn aamt CAL. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in your case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR10539 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 DIC Docket No. 1552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) HOMC memo 1910 MMSR-2 dtd 17 Mar 15 (3) Subject’s naval record 1... Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to adjust payment of Involuntary Separation Pay...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR10541 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 HCG Docket No. NR10541-14 27 Apr 15 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records TO: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR10551 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 HCG Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show advancement to a higher grade. CONCLUSION Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR10557 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 JEA Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to modify an immediate reenlistment contract. The immediate reenlistment contract (NAVPERS 1070/6001), executed on or about 25 October 2013 is for a term of 5...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR10560 14
Your current request has been carefully examined by a three- member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session on 3 March 2015. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in your case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR10560 14_Redacted
member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session on 23 March 2015. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in your case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR10574 14
NR10574-14 9 Dec 14 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: . REVIEW.OF NAVAL RECORD ICO Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C, 1552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) HOMC memo 5420 MMEA atd 23 Oct 14 (3) HOMC email dtd 5 Dec 14 (4) Subject's naval record L. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR10575 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in your case. NR10575-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR10577 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the enlisted performance evaluation report for 17 March to 23 May 2005 (copy at Tab A). CONCLUSION: Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence of an error warranting the following corrective...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR10578 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 June 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR10581 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval . The Board, consisting of Si as QUE «ev iewea Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 22 December 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, CGetermined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. NR10581-14 finds the existence of an injustice warranting...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR10582 14
Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings St this Board. It is regretted that the circumstances of your ca that favorable action cannot be taken. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR10583 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted = 4 swine SS a a -] = a x 7 oa sos ges of your application, together with all material support thereoi, your naval record ana applicable statu regulations and policies. In addition, J report of the Headquarters Marine Corps ri € Review Board (PERB), dated 16 September 2014, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR10584 14
BR three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 December 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error oF injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR10585 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 December 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR10587 14
ErRAR Livi! Your allegations of injustice were reviewed in accordance with adminis regulations and procedures applicable to tl 4 Board. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR10588 14
The Board found it an immaterial error that the corrected ending date of the first report at issue and the corrected beginning date of the second report are the same date. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR10589 14
Orr THE WAVY F Ee : CORRECTION OF NAVAL RE CORDS uu INGTON, VA 22204-2420 JSR Docket No: NR10589-14 4 Decemper 2014 Dear Colonel ee * : This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section L552 » You requested % that the fitness report for 7 December 2009 to 21 July 2010 be modified by removing the entire section K (reviewing officer’s (RO’S) marks and comments) . New evidence is evidence not...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR10590 14
You requested completely removing the fitness reports for 1 April to 30 November 2008 and 1 December 2008 to 1 March 2009 oO It is noted that the Commandant of the Marine Corps (CMC) has directed completely removing the contested report for 1 April to 30 November 2008 and modifying the report for 1 December 2008 to 1 March 2009 (by sana from section K.4 (reviewing officer's comments), “[You] woul benetit + rom increasing [your] follow through and mission erat ent A three-member panel of the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR10591 14
Rem s ReeRIe Om ORD A SNE Bre Re er ee OT jas ZN fhe 7 y POAPD FOR C ORRECTION OF NAVA! RECORNDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, Sulit UN ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 JSR Docket No: NR10591-14 ere TR a Awl - -- AM A Dear Staff sero gap i This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States ‘Code, section 1552. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR10592 14
a three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 December 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR10593 14
Although the Board voted not to modify the fitness report in question, you may submit the RO’s letter to future selection boards. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR10594 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 December 2014. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in the report of the PERB. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR10595 14
You requested modifying the fitness report for 16 July 2012 to 31 May 2013 by making section K (reviewing officer's marks and comments) “not observed.” You further requested removing your failure of selection by the Fiscal Year 2015 Major Selection Board. It is noted that the Commandant of the Marine Corps (CMC) has irected the requestea modification of the fitness report in R three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR10596 14
It is noted that the Commandant of the Marine Corps (CMC) has directed modifying the contested report by removing, from section I (reporting senior’s “Directed and Additional Comments”), “MRO [Marine reported on] being assigned to the BCP [Body Composition Program] “ A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 December 2014 Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR10599 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 October 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR10600 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 December 2014. Documentary material ed of your application, together support thereof, your naval regulations and policies 7h report of the Headquarters Marine Review Board (PERB), dated 16 After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR10601 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 October 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1061 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 $8, COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1004 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 DIC Docket No. NRi061-14 27 Jun 14 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: Ref: {a} Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show reimbursement.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR10618 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S, COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 JEA Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a Zone “B” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB). 2 The Board, consisting of a. Ce) and as reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR10628 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in your case. NR10628-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR10656 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by HQMC memo 1400/3 MMPR-2 dated 27 February 2015, a copy of which is attached. NR10656-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1068 14
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by HQMC Memo 4920 MPO of 29 May 14, copy of which 4s attached and was previously sent you, to which you failed to respond. However, the DoD 1341.13 specifically states that ‘an individual may not add family members after retirement or separation from Military Services, uscG, NOAA Corps, or PHS, but may modify the number of months of transferred entitlement or revoke transfer of entitlement after retirement or...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR10691 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference:(a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with “his Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the fitness report for 1 January to 31 duly 2007 (copy at Tab A). The Board, consisting of Messrs. Exnicios, Ivins and Spain, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 30 October 2014, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR10692 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 March 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR10694 14
en ee : were ram t rower “vr rr i rer. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR10695 14
DErARIMWEMN! Ur the RAY T PAAR PARP FRM PFr Ee TION Ae NAN Se preompr 701 5, COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 100i ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 Dear Master ‘
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR10712 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 HCG Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to authorize reimbursement for a Personally Procured Move (PPM). NR10712-14 RECOMMENDATION : That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR10723 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S, COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 HCG Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to grade a Navy Wide Advancement Examination (NWAE) against a prior eyele. NR10723-14 RECOMMENDATION: That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR10733 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in your case. NR10733-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR10737 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 JEA Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “C” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB). The Board, consisting of | _ ac ip reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR10738 12
of reference (a), Petitioner, a former officer of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his naval record be corrected by removing any and all derogatory material referencing the imposition of nonjudicial punishment (NJP) on 3 December 2009, for conduct unbecoming an officer and a gentleman, issuance of a Punitive Letter of Reprimand dated 10 December 2009, the proceedings of a Board of Inquiry (BOI) dated 16 November 2010, and administrative separation documentation...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR10743 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, an enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his record be corrected removing form number 38MSC (ADVERSE/PRIVILEGED INFO MISC) ral court- martial (GCM) Order number 21-11 dated 7 December 2011, from his official military personnel file (OMPF), after being found not guilty and being acquitted of all charges and specifications. Accordingly, the convening authority issued a GCM order...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR10750 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 DIC Docket No. (3) Subject’s naval record 1. Pursuant to the’ provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to modify a Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active duty (DD Form 214).
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR10758 14_Redacted
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 May 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. After applying these guidelines to the evidence in the case, the Board was not able to substantiate the existence of PTSD in your case.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR10771 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 §. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board , requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to cancel, and then issue, an agreement to extend enlistment. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR10777 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB). reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 4 May 15 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR10799 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 April 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...