NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR11277 14
In this regard, your current request has been carefully examined by a three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session on 3 March 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board determined that the statements you provided, even though not previously considered by the Board, were insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. A review of your recent application reveals that...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1128 15
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY TOW merapnc FWAVAL RECORDS ARD FOR COR Docket No. NRitz2e-15 z © an offices consequently, when applying for 4 correction o- record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence probaple material error or injustice. nave- m a e ety Sincerely, BaTAAW £ OF a BS I FFE Li UW Unt” ROBERT J. O'NEILL & o Enclosure: NSSC ltr 4050 Ser NW42/135 dtd 20 Oct 14
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR11287 14
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinions furnished by CNRFC letter 5420 Ser N1/0194 dated 4 March 2015 and CNRFC letter 5420 Ser N1/0562 dated 16 May 2014, copies of which are attached. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in your case. NR11287-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR11316 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 HD 1 Et Ranaes 7 ANTE 4.9 Depot 2008 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Ref: (a) LO U.8.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, nereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing from the Marine Corps Total...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR11324 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 JEA Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) . 7 and reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 4 May 15 and,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1134 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 June 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR11354 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, an enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his naval record be corrected by removing a nonjudicial punishment (NJP} dated 15 May 2008, which reflects an erroneously filed offense of underage drinking. The Board, consisting of [iis reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 3 March 2015, and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the partial corrective action...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR11369 14
The page 11 entry was not considered, as the attached e-mail dated 28 October 2014 from Headquarters Marine Corps (HOMC) shows that neither the entry nor your rebuttal appears in your Official Military Personnel File. A three-member panel of the Board for correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 November 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its gecision in this case.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR11371 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 HCG Docket No. NR11371-14 27 Apr 15 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: _REVIEW_OF NAVAL RECORD ICO Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR11403 14
A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 April 2015. After careful consideration of your application, the Board concluded that your application was not timely filed, and that it would not be in the interest of justice to excuse your failure to submit your application ina timely manner. In your case, the Board determined that a personal appearance was not necessary and considered your case based on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR11436 14
' ROARND FOR CORRECTION OF IN Oi &S, COURTING ULSE HOA — n reference naval peaama pursuant to the provis to your applica ions section 1552. United States Code, 4 Tm AL AVM a AVAL RECORDS ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 HD Docket No: NR11436-14 bf ae Neramher 204 tion for correction of your of title 10 of the BA three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval = of Records, sitting in executive session, application on 11 December 2014 Your injustice were reviewed in accordance regulations...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR11438 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 §. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval r to show the Petitioner reenlisted and is eligible for adv under the provisions of the Selective Training and Reenlistment (STAR) program. NR11438-14 RECOMMENDATION: That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show that: a, The Tmmediatre Reenlistment...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1145 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, an enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board, requesting that his naval record be corrected by removing any and all derogatory material regarding the nonjudicial punishment (NUP) imposed on 31 July 2007 and the fitness report (FITREP) for the period from 16 December 2006 to 31 July 2007, which references the NUP, from both his official military personnel file (OMPF) and the Marine Corps Total Force System...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR11458 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 §. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to cancel, and issue an agreement to extend enlistment. at the Board's review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board’s proceedings in the above passes Tey } 4 It is certified that...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1148 14
In addition, the Board considered the reports of the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 23 January and i8 July 2014, copies of which are attached, and your letter dated 6 February 2014 with enclosures. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR11485 14
NGTON, VA 22204-2490 your application o the provisions Cc o A three-member panel Records, sitting ine L e application on 16 December 20 members of the panel will Your allegations of error and in accordance with administrative applicable to the proceedings material considered by the Bo 1 S together with all material su naval record, and applicable ne ae tue a a qa He wage ? we Wat — Wa eoe ame Se LY st te QO SG oO i e in eA} On b- p- a] pe tO Oo 3 Qa OQ RE oom o wy i) 3 -Orcda = Mm mn...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR11499 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 April 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR11509 14
Because your application was submitted with new evidence not previously considered, the Board found it in the interest of justice to review your application. Your current request has been carefully examined by a three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session on 7 April 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board determined that the documentation that you provided, even though not previously considered by...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR11534 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 $. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 October 2014. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1155 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by changing his separation code of JPD (alcohol rehabilitation failure} and reentry code of RE-4 (not recommended for retention), issued on 28 October 2004, be changed to RE-1 (recommended for retention). He was administratively separated on 28 October 2004 with a general...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR11559 14
It is noted that the Navy Personnel Command ( contested report for 25 January to 15 March 20098 BR three-member pane sitting in executi 2OLS:. umentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1156 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 March 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1156 14_Redacted
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 March 2015. The Board, in its review of your entire record and application, carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as your record of service, desire to be restored to paygrade E-5, and assertion that your diagnosed post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) contributed to your misconduct while on active duty. Consequently, when applying for a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR11569 14
A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 April 2015. After careful consideration of your application, the Board concluded that your application was not timely filed, and that it would not be in the interest of justice to excuse your failure to submit your application ina timely manner. Specifically, you stated “personal doctor was specific that sickness is service connected and no history...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1157 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 704 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2480 boc Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enciosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone sp" Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB). The Board, congsisting of Mr. Zsalman, Mr. George, and Mr. Ruskin, reviewed...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1159 14
Pursuant te the provisions of reference (a) Subject, nereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to modify an enlistment/reenlistment document . The Board, consisting of Mr. Zsaiman, Mr. George, and Mr. Ruskin, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 30 June 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR11594 14
A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 April 2015. After careful consideration of your application, the Board concluded that your application was not timely filed, and that it would not be in the interest of justice to excuse your failure to submit your application in a timely manner. Specifically, you stated “because I’m fighting for disability and I was discharged because of medical condition” as...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR11597 14
your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552, A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 March 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After careful...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR11606 14
Your current request has been carefully examined by a three- member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session on 3 March 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application and any material submitted in support of your application. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board determined that the statements you provided, even though not previously considered by the Board, were insufficient...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR11609 14_Redacted
Your current request has been carefully examined by a three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session on 26 June 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application and any material submitted in support of your application. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board determined that the statements you provided and assertion of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) as a reason for...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1161 14
NR1161-14 5 Aug 14 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) . The Board, consisting of Mr. Zsalman, Mr. George, and Mr....
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR11612 14_Redacted
Documentary material considered by of your application, together with all : in support thereof, your naval record, and regulations, and policies record r personality n immaturi heroin, cocaine, amphetamine uana, a diethylamide (LSD). Further, the Board concluded that you received the benefit of your bargain with the Navy when your request for discharge was granted and you should not be permitted to charige it now. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR11617 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 April 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. You petitioned the Board for Correction of Naval Records seeking the reinstatement of advancement to E-4, and the credit of 32 days leave.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1162 14
A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 January 2015. After careful consideration of your application, the Board concluded that your application was not timely filed, and that it would not be in the interest of justice to excuse your failure to submit your application ina timely manner. Specifically, you stated “to apply for VA compensation for ankle injury on active duty with subsequent disability I...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1163 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (i) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was entitled to payment of Involuntary Separation Pay (ISP) when he was discharged. The Board, consisting of Mr. Zsalman, Mr. George, and Mr. Ruskin, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 30 June 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1165 14
on S November 2013, You previously petitioned the Board and were advised in our letter of 23 October 2013, that your application had been denied. Your current request has been carefully examined by a three- member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session on 24 February 2015. Accordingly, your application has been denied.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR11662 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 February 2015. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR11663 14
It is note@ that the Commandant of the Marine Corps (CMC) has directed modifying the contested report by removing, from section I (reporting senior’s “Directed and Additional Comments”), “Future assignment should be within a unit whose mission allows further development of [your] mobility knowledge and sharpening of fyour] leadership sl:ilis.” A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 February 2015. New...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR11670 14
Bb three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 February 2015. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR11671 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 January 2015. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is.on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1168 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 100) ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 e-member €& MEME adn were you did nat provide a diagnosis and that the severity of your misconduct outweighed the mitigation of your possible diagnosis. Accordingly, your application has been denied. It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1168 14_Redacted
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 7015S, COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 TAT LAL Docket No: 1168-14 27 February 2015 D m ar This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. fy Although your application was not filed in a timely manner, the Board found it in the es of justice to waive the statute of limitations and consider your Ba ean on...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR11683 14
a oe — me AP wern sent DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY ee OR BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS AN Se. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 January 2015. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR11685 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 December 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, ‘regulations and policies. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR11687 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 January 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR11689 14
Your current request has been carefully examined by a three- member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session on 3 March 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application and any material submitted in support of your application. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board determined that the statements you provided, even though not previously considered by the Board, were insufficient...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR11701 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 §, COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 100 ARLINGTON. VA 22204-2480 REram jan of Nave Records Q1ybh4 ubj ‘ \ us. HA BB es Refi a) Title 10 U.S.C.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1171 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on . After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR11714 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 ES Docket No: 11714-14 1 May 2015 a e to your Appiicati a D Form 149, date requested the record be corrected b ishment (NJP) and an administrati } To hh 4 + _ ne NOP had been se both dated 22 March 2010, because December 2014. A copy of vour DD information. 4 ty (Di = = a ly 1 + +) “5 5 el = “Fr .
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1173 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in Support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion from Headquarters Marine Corps dated 14 May 2014, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...