NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6849 14_Redacted
5 U.S.C 552(b) (6)5 U.S.C 552(b) (6)5 U.S.C 552(b) (6)5 U.S.C 552(b) (6)5 U.S.C 552(b) (6)5 U.S.C 552(b) (6)
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6850 14
NR6850-14 S$ Dec 14 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records - To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to modify an immediate reenlistment contract. The Board, consisting of reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and‘injustice on 8 December 2014 and, pursuant...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6853 14_Redacted
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 June 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6854 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 May 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6856 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S, COURTHOUSE ROAD, Suiie i001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204 ' JET Docket No. NR6856-14 22 Dec 14 From: Chairman; Board for Correction of Naval Pecords To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO Ref: (a} Title 10.U.S.Cc. Pursuant to the provisions of reference {a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6859 14
1552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments {2} Naval Personnel Command (NPC) memo 1430 Ser 8112/0254 - of 13 Aug 2014 i. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval. The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Ruskin and Exnicios reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 2 September 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6861 14_Redacted
5 U.S.C 552(b) (6)5 U.S.C 552(b) (6)5 U.S.C 552(b) (6)5 U.S.C 552(b) (6)5 U.S.C 552(b) (6)5 U.S.C 552(b) (6)
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6863 14_Redacted
A three- member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 June 2015. On 17 July 1985, you were notified of administrative separation by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse at which time you waived your procedural rights. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6865 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner had declined participation in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP), with spousal concurrence, prior to his transfer to the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL). The Board, consisting of Mr. Ruskin, Mr. Vogt, and Ms. Bianchi reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 7 October 2014 and,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6866 14
LPrvaned DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BROS BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS f01 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 BIC Docket No. NR6866-14 9 Dec 14 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) NPC memo 1160 Ser 813/169 dtd 7 Aug 14 (3) Subject’s naval record 1.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6869 14
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 June 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps (HOMC) memo 1600 RcT of 5 May 2014, a copy of which was previously provided to you on 27 May 2014 and again on 5 June 2014 to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6870 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with ali material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps (HOMC) memo 1660 RCT of 6 May 2014, a COpy of which was previously provided to you on 27 May 2014, and which is now enclosed. ra correction of an official Consequently, when applying fo naval record, the burden...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6879 14
NR6879-14 application claims, “I was not informed of the two year requirement to transfer my GI Bill would take effect at the time of transfer.” In reviewing your record, however, the Board concurred with NAVADMIN 203/09 states “For those eligible for retirement on or after 1 August 2011 and before 1 August 2012, three years of additional service is required.” Therefore since you did not have an additional three years of remaining service, you were ineligible to transfer your Post-9/1i1 GI...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6880 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS TE 1001 701 §. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2 Docket Ne 8 BC 24 Feb j BpBoaTa warrant RECOMMENDATION: That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show that: nr Nierharne fram Aetive Thira (nn a Tie Cartrifirate oF Peljeace 998 is modified to Porm 214, Mow 88} ayeented on or about 30 June i read block 18 (Remarks) ‘Drill month, 1 February 1981 (1 drill)", “prill month, 1 March 1981 (6 @rills)”,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6882 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval / record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of Docket No.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6883 14
OE PTIAN OF NAVAL RE BOARD FOR CORRECT ION OF NAVAL REN 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, Sulte ARLINGTON. VA 22204 ne Enys OCrrrect OT nt NW rs = t a From , rec rf Or the Navy ba s RECORD f rs t) : \a PLOLS om sTIcCIYe | Petitione st has mer maerrants favorable action Warralite OL CONCLUSION ot sent 3 J] considerat f oO Hh cat DD + “he fF ay at t He } 0 @m w tt 14 t] = end daate Z ears with an period of 3 years Witi a ae F } = -_ J " : os wei I / ; ¢ ESHA S a that her Home ot Recora y ; NO b On 21...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6887 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S, COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO Ref: (a) THtle 10 U.8
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6889 14
ae DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY ce) Lo BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490 BAN Docket No:NR06889-14 5 December 2014 ' From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records TG: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD 0 arr Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner had 20 qualifying years for a non-regular Reserve retirement. The Board,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6892 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 8. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be ccrrected to modify an immediate reenlistment contract. The Board, consisting of QRIIAIIRARasaassiti a Ramey, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 20 January 2015 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6893 14_Redacted
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6902 14_Redacted
NR6902-14 3 Mar 15 This is in reference to your application for orrection of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1 5 BR three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 March 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and poli ‘es. New evidence...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6904 14_Redacted
COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 DIC Docket No. NR6904- 14 3 Mar 15 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552 BR three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on > March 2015. New evidence is evidence not y this case.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6907 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 31 July 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies, In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 30 May 2014, a copy of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6908 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 $. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show restoration of accrual leave. NR6908-14 RECOMMENDATION: That Petitioner's naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show that: a. Petitioner executed a Special Leave Accrual request for restoration of 25 days leave.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6909 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 3. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to add the Loan Repayment Program (LRP) to her enlistment guarantees. CONCLUSION Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6910 14
R three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 31 July 2014. after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6912 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in your case. NR6312-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6913 14_Redacted
A three- member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 July 2015. Concerning your assertion that you were discharged due to your dismissed domestic battery charge in civilian court, there is no indication in the record that this was the case; you were discharged for willfully disobeying a superior commissioned officer’s military protective order to stay away from your spouse. In your case, the Board determined...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6918 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive gession, considered your application on 31 duly 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted r application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6924 14
AR three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 31 July 3014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR693 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a Prior Service Affiliation Bonus. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office having cognizance over’ the subject matter addressed in Petitioner's application has commented to the effect that the request has merit and CONCLUSION Upon review and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6934 14
TET Rem OTR NT , lu cin i DIP Ar PIVILIN ! A e Board for Correction of Naval Records, considered your application on sitti 19 November 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6938 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVA\ RECORDS 704 §, COURTHOUSE ROAD. SUITE 100" ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 < uf Pram Chairmar Roarad ar - OWN r Darardc "Cys seCLeLlaliy ve were Subd]: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO Or Documenté materia. c c e+rec * ST tt c wec aac c = - - nig aw eg at ris b.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6952 14
Although your application was not filed in a timely manner, the Board found it in the interest of justice to waive the statute of limitations and consider your application on its merits... A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 March 2015. After waiving your procedural right to consult with legal counsel and to present your case to an administrative discharge board (ADB), your commanding officer...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6960 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S&. Pursuant to the provisions of reference {a) Subject, hereinafter ~ referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to advance Petitioner to a higher grade. The Board, consisting of reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 28 January 2015 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6963 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 rO% c 2204-249 ARLINGTON. VA > A Ke WALA 2 Se ee ate eM the Navy 20 Ser N130¢ reference ity 4 enclosure cad appl: paymeé = : sh te ' Petitioner's ailegat.ions fF error anc S f find e EF. = ~ c — aamin LI k sulations within the Department of the Nav) > ched = enclos 2 the FLIC ter addressed in Petitioner's that as merit and nd CONCLUSION ew and consideration of all light of the contents justice...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6966 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 §. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 Docket NR6 966-14 24 Mat From: Chairman Roard for Correction of Nawa | Rernarndcs To: Secretary of the Navy 1) DD Form 149 w/attachments 2) NPC memo 1430 Ser 812/0404 atd 16 Dec 14 3 j 's naval record ursuant to the provisions of re o as Petitioner, filed en he fect, that the app 1 1 Navy Wide Advancement Exam (NWAE) cycle 219 Pi ) ard, consisting of reviewed Petitioner's...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6968 14_Redacted
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 June 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when ‘applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6969 14
1552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) Office of the Chief of Naval Operations (CNO) memo 7220 N130D/14U1513 of 12 Nov 2014 1, Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he was entitled to receive Assignment Incentive Pay (AIP) from 23 August 2009 to 31 August 2014 at a rate of $1700.00 per month. Docket No.NR06969-14 CONCLUSION Upon review and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6971 14_Redacted
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 June 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 15 April and 30 May 1986, you received (NUP) for two specification of failing to obey a lawful order, a period of four days of UA, and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6973 14
Pursuant fo the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referredtoas Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by restoring his name to the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL)}. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice, finds as follows: a. Recorder 5.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6976 14_Redacted
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 June 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in your case.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6977 14_Redacted
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 June 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6980 14
NR6980-14 28 Jan 15 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of To; Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.c. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval-record be corrected to authorize advancement to a higher grade. CONCLUSION Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6981 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure {1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to authorize reimbursement for a Personally Procured Move (PPM).. 2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Que reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 28 January 2015 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6982 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 April 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6984 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 704 §. Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to reflect that Petitioner served in the Reserve Component for.service segment 2 May 1986 through 30 November 1993. The Board, consisting of eee reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error an njustice on 20 January 2015 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6989 14_Redacted
Documentary material ‘considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Further, you stated to your superiors your desire to go home and that you would continue to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6992 14_Redacted
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Subsequently, you were notified of pending administrative separation action by reason of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6993 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1004 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 DIC Docket No. - referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1} with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record BE corrected to modify an immediate reenlistment contract. The Board, consisting of (ey reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 20 January 2015 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...