NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7001 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 May 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7002 14_Redacted
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 May 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7004 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S, COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 mre Docket No: 7004-14 8 May 2015 This 1s in reference to your App i, + lication for Correction of n which you requested the record Military Records, DD Form 149, be corrected to reflect a “general under honorable conditions” characterization of service on your Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty (DD Form 214). [In this regard, you may wish to contact...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7007 14_Redacted
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 May 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7008 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 December 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Docket No.NRO7008-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7010 14_Redacted
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 July 2015. The Board, in its review of your entire record and application, carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as your desire to upgrade your discharge, reference letters, and request to change your discharge date on your Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty (DD Form 214). Consequently, when applying for a correction of an...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7014 14_Redacted
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 ES Docket No: 7014-14 25 June 2015 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Tos Secretary of the Navy \ Ref: (a) LO UsS.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that the characterization of his discharge be changed. The d, consisting of reviewed...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7018 14
menmaAmrnaAchIT Mo TUG AAW Y Per Ayres oe re ore —~ - jc oT A T SisyiTe ae +4 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD. SUITE 10C ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 eee oats Lae. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7023 14
701 S COURTHOUSE ROAD SUITE 100% ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2491 arranr w/atta + 97 P) 7 2) 2c memo did 2/ vu Docket Ne. NETO23-14 RECOMMENDATION: That Petitioner's naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show that: - Tei ar Te te 997 Wahrusary anin pRaNMe fas £2 eho Nawreor.y S,, BeZex co Mee OT Pabmuety 2020 Taste ne tee | ompele=) anralied in SBP for child onl pisabliicy Reiiged List {FoR he the full base amount, NL coverage, at He was not married at the time. MN 2s the benet iciaries.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7025 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 m2 Docket No: 7025-14 18 May 2015 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 May 2015. After careful consideration of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7028 14_Redacted
5 U.S.C 552(b) (6)5 U.S.C 552(b) (6)5 U.S.C 552(b) (6)5 U.S.C 552(b) (6)5 U.S.C 552(b) (6)5 U.S.C 552(b) (6)
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR703 14
DEPARTMENT Or THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 704 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 400° ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 DIC Docket No. NR703-14 1 Jul i4 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, Filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicabie naval record be corrected to modify an immediate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7031 14_Redacted
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 June 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. However, on 18 December 1973, you began a 167-day period of unauthorized absence (UA) until you were apprehended and returned to military authority...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7032 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable Statutes, regulations, and policies. The Board, in its review of your entire record and application, carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as your desire to change your RE-4 reenlistment code. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in your case.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7034 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 May 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7035 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure {1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the Petitioner declined enrollment in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 9 March 2015 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7045 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY cord pursuant to the Mut oUdaliL hee A comments Bill, ) was on 30 c : g ame effective on e components summer 2008 suMMeT n t x D wu srning regulations, nember must be on active duty : t selec = reserve at the time of the election yoo important feature of the law because provisions are intended as an incent Docket No. NR7045-14 who are retired are not eligible to transfer their education benefits. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7048 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 January 2015. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Docket No.NRU7048-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7085 14
NR7085-14 21 Jan 15 From: Chairman, Board for Correction cf Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO enn eee. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be. CONCLUSION Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board fainds the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7086 14_Redacted
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 JDR Docket No: 7086-14 5 August 2015 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. After careful consideration of your application, the Board concluded that your application was not timely filed, and that it would not be in the interest of justice to excuse your...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7087 14_Redacted
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 June 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. In regard to your assertions, the Board determined that your allegations of harassment and discrimination do not excuse your misconduct or failure...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7088 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 § COURTHOUSE ROAD, Sk ARLINGTON, VA 22204-249¢ he .-m = eas aamimi W Ds 4 COrZ espondence at 7 it 1 a “e over the su it tioner’s commented to the effect that the request as merit and le action CONCLUS RECOMMENDATION: That Petitioner's naval record be corrected, show that: a. The Petitioner executed a written reauest for conve t the same level of spouse Lo Faemor cpouse SRP coverage, at previously elected, a the bene The...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7093 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S, COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490 BAN | Docket No.NRO7093-14 9 December 2014 From: .Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD 1;0f/i ey Ref: {a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7094 14_Redacted
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 June 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7096 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY ” BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490 BAN Docket No.NRO7096-14 13 January 2015 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD [CO QSAR Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. enclosure (1) with this Board requesting to be advanced to E-5/YN2 from the September 2103 Navy-wide advancement examination. The Board, consisting of @i7 7s reviewed Petitioner’s allegations...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7097 14_Redacted
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 June 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7099 14
NAVY THE PARTMENT OF DE r PAL 4 AF BO! sft 4 oO c 2 romment he C9 OV ng TL nin s in 0 peg Docket No. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval the applicant to demonstrate the exist record, the burden is on ence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7100 14_Redacted
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 July 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Although the discharge documentation is not in your record, it appears that administrative separation action was initiated by reason of personality...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7112 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In additicn, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memo 5420 PERS- 836/149 dtd 29 Dec 14, a copy of which is attached. NR7112-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7113 14_Redacted
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 June 2015. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in your case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7114 14
NR7114-14 17 Jun 14 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: Ref: {a) Title 10 U.S.C. requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the Petitioner declined enrollment in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). The Board, consisting of Mr. Zsalman, Mr. George, and Mr. Ruskin, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 16 June 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7118 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 April 2015. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by OCNO memo 7220 Ser N130D/14U1467 of 4 November 2014, a copy of which is attached. However, the Board found that your orders to VP-45 had a Projected Rotation Date (PRD) of November 2015.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7121 14
In your own words you state “my recruiter and classifier at MEPS both failed to make me aware of the bonus I was entitled to as per my rate (AIRC), and time of entry.” Enlistment bonuses are not a Docket No. In your case it was not offered and you voluntarily signed up without the incentive of an enlistment bonus. Consequently, when applying For a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7128 14_Redacted
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 July 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7180 14_Redacted
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 MTN Docket No: 7180-14 21 July 2015 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy AXK-XX Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. In this regard, the Board notes Petitioner’s overall record of military service, conduct average, and current Department of the Navy policy as established in reference (b), that relief in the form of her characterization of service...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7182 14_Redacted
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 July 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7185 14
F THE NAVY cerorRos DEPARTMENT O BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 §, COURTHOUSE ROAD SUITE 100% 2204-249 ARLINGTON, VA 44 Correcti Board for ‘or Docket No. WR7185-14 a correction of an official naval stence of plicant to demonstrate the e*2 wnen applying for den is on the ap error Or injustice. consequently, record, the bur probable material ely / ROBERT J. O'NEILL Executive Director Enclosure: NPC memo 1160 Ser 812/0386 dta 8 Dec 14 he
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7187 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 March 2015. Documentary material _considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. NR7187-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7189 14
material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by OCNO memo 7220 Ser N130C2/15U0151 dated 5 February 2015, a copy of which was provided to you on 7 February 2015, and is being provided to you now. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7192 14_Redacted
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Further, an RE-3P reentry code is authorized when a Marine is discharged, due to failing the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7198 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S, COURTHOUSE ROAD 1001 ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490 JET Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected ' to adjust proficiency and conduct marks. reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 2 March 2015 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7200 14_Redacted
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 July 2015. With that being said, the Board further concluded that in accordance with regulatory guidelines, your “terminal leave” did not factor into the time you actually served on active duty and therefore should not have been calculated as time served. Consequently, when appliing for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7204 14
Furthermore, the Petitioner's. CONCLUSION: Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and notwithstanding the opinion expressed in enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting corrective action. Furthermore, the DD Form 2656 was completed prior to Petitioner's retirement.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7208 14_Redacted
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 July 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7210 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1004 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 HCG Docket No. NR7210-14 15 Jan 15 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.c. The Board, consisting ( (ii ay reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 14 January 2015 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR722 14
A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 January 2015. After careful consideration of your application, the Board concluded that your application was not timely filed; and that it would not be in the interest of justice to excuse your failure to submit your application in a timely manner. Specifically, you provided the statement ‘I have become a productive citizen in my community.’ as the basis...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7220 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 March 2015. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of - probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7227 14
NR7227-14 6 Apr 15 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to change the term of reenlistment to establish eligibility to transfer Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits to his dependents. The Board, consisting...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7230 14_Redacted
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 June 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Subsequently, your commanding officer initiated administrative discharge action by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7231 14_Redacted
NR7231-14 3 Mar 15 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Navai Records EO): Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was entitled to payment of Involuntary Separation Pay (ISP) when he was discharged. Note: Payment of non-disability full...