NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6683 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 April 2015. evidence not previously considered by the Board its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probabie material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6686 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 DIC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference {a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to modify an immediate reenlistment contract. The Board, consisting of eel reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 20 January 2015 and,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6689 14_Redacted
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 June 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6693 14_Redacted
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 June 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and palicies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6698 14
Pursuant to-the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to modify an immediate reenlistment contract. The Board, consisting of qe, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 8 December 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6699 14_Redacted
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 July 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6705 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 March 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of Docket No.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6707 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 January 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR671 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 February 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Characterization of service is based in part on conduct marks assigned on a periodic basis.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6733 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to remove the Loan Repayment Program (LRP) from her enlistment guarantees. NRG733-14 finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective action. Option (2) of Annex B to the DD Form 4 reflects “N/A”, vice “Loan Repayment Plan”.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6737 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 5. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 HD Docket No. 1552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 dtd 7 May 14 w/attachments (2) HOmMC JPL memo cata 14 Nov 14 (3) HOMC MIQ memo dtd 12 Jan 15 (4) Subject's e-mail dtd 12 Mar 15 w/attachments (5) Subject ’s naval record 1.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6739 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 January 2015. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in your case. NR6739-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6741 14_Redacted
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 June 2015. On 13 November 1995, the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) upgraded the characterization of your discharge to general under honorable conditions based on your post service eonduct . Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6742 14
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6746 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 November 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6749 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S, COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 DIC Docket No. NR6749-14 9 Dec 14 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. The Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active duty (DD Form 214, Aug 2009), executed on or about 19 April 2014, is modified to read block 26 (Separation Code) “JBK1” vice “KBK1”.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6750 14_Redacted
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 June 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Based on the information currently contained in your record, you submitted a written request for an other than honorable (OTH) discharge in order to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6751 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 707 §. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure {1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that the Petitioner transferred to the Fleet Reserve. record.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6755 14_Redacted
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 DIC Docket No. NR6755-14 3 Mar 15 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval i record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552 f the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive ession, acide your application on 2 March 2015. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6757 14_Redacted
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on , 1 July 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR676 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive gession, congidered your application on 5 November 2014. Documentary material considered by _ the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6761 14
)¢ OR i z = ce Py Oo om Pe Hw YU Q) o 4 w cd Oop GQ i St) ~ 3 uO oO O oO Mm o ow Wi @ o iW Oo 1) Ow 3 wm o i @ oH oa rc Q oO wm @ Yo aoa G fx ag Ww o Ho o,nn oD SG wy 2 Hed & OV Qa Oo HS Qo44 Hi E 1 gm O Youn o oH U Ee “cl wv 1 ~ oH ow “ ou vO rd My oy ed ri} 3. 0Ort > WO © oO G am vo 4 ) + co Up ICel beca law ed as an ea r ena 15 4 provi Docket No. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6765 14_Redacted
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 July 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Subsequently, you were notified of pending administrative separation action by reason of misconduct due to a conviction by a Civil court.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6768 14_Redacted
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 TLG Docket No: 6768-14 2 July 2015 A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 July 2015. The Board determined that the reason you provided was insufficient to waive the statute of limitations and there is no evidence provided that indicates you were unable to file your...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6779 14
In February 2013, after careful consideration of your request, the Board found insufficient evidence of an error oF injustice that would warrant the relief you sought. R three-member panel of the Board for correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 June 2014. accordingly, your request for reconsideration is denied.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6791 14
gsalman, Exnicios and Ruskin reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 21 July 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. CONCLUSION Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosures (2) and {3}, the Docket No.NR6791-14 Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective action. 22...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6795 14
V4 Cc NC 1D 18 at mr en+ anwawIs rm + ~ ee = 3 cation for correctiol JL LL c fy mac 155 2 + Wok = < concurred Accordingly, and votes or t request. Te te a = Chat B evidence within one = is important to keep Docket No. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden i the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6796 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 §. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 100° Vio ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RE Ref 2) Title LO U.S.C Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments 2} OCNO memc - N130C2/15U0164 dtd 5 Feb (3) Subject’s naval record Documentary m es, nave- cons f the Q a ) y Docket No. It is certified that quorum was present at the Board's review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board's proceedings in...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6797 14_Redacted
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 June 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6800 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S, COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE-100° ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 DIC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show timely request for conversion from spouse to former spouse coverage under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). Recorder 5.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6801 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 December 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof ana applicable statutes, ea and policies In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated 9 sceoher 2018, = copy Seer an auamenien The Board also considered your...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6802 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 DIC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be ccrrected to modify immediate reenlistment contract, and then cancel an .agreement to extend enlistment. The immediate reenlistment contract (NAVPERS 1070/6011), executed...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6803 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinions furnished by HQMC memo 1400/3 MMPR-2 dated 13 February 2015 and HQMC memo 1400/3 MMPR-2 dated 18 November 2014, copies of which are attached. NR6803-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6809 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to retroactive Dental Additional Special Pay (ASP) for the period of 10 June 2010 through 9 June 2011 and 10 June 2011 to 9 June 2012 at the annual rate of $10,000 per year. Docket No.NRGé809-14 CONCLUSION Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6811 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure {1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show advancement to a higher grade. The Board, consisting of reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error an injustice on 10 Mare . of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6812 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 March 2015. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memo 1430 Ser , 812/0009 dtd 8 Jan 15, a copy of which is attached. NR6812-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6815 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 7h &. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to retroactive Special Duty Assignment Pay. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section -6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6 (e)) and having...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6816 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the _applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to retroactive Special Duty Assignment Pay. The Board, consisting of Qs, GH -eviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 4 December 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Pursuant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6819 14_Redacted
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 July 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6820 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 DIC Docket No. NR6820-14 9 Dec 14 From: Chairman, Board for Correction cf Maval PRocords To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) NPC memo 1160 Ser 813/272 dtd 6 Nov 14 (3) Subject’s naval record 1.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6821 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490 BAN Docket No.NR0O6821-14 9 December 2014 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD 1° IAN
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6826 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490 BAN Docket No.NRO6826-14 13 January 2015 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.c. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting to remove ten of his Page 11’s counseling entries from his official record, 2. The Board, consisting of reviewed Petitioner's...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6828 14
A three-member: panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 December 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. NR6828-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR683 14_Redacted
three-member panel of che Board :or Correcc~on of Nava: Records, sitting in executive session, considered your applicacion on 22 January 2015 . warrant recharacterization of your discharge given the seriousness of your misconduct and request for discharge . Further, the Board concluded that you received the benefit of your bargain with the Marine Corps when your request for discharge was granted and should not be permitted to change it now .
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6830 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 September 2014. The Board for Correction of Naval Records has also denied upgrading your discharge from General (Under Honorable Conditions) to Honorable. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice .
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6835 14_Redacted
5 U.S.C 552(b) (6)5 U.S.C 552(b) (6)5 U.S.C 552(b) (6)5 U.S.C 552(b) (6)5 U.S.C 552(b) (6)5 U.S.C 552(b) (6)
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6840 14_Redacted
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 June 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in Support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6844 14_Redacted
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 155 A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 March 2015. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6846 14
Your current request has been carefully examined by a three- member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, any material submitted in support of your application, and prior case file. Bfter careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board determined your letter, even though not previously considered by the Board, was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6848 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the illegible service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)”) entry. CONCLUSION: Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence of an error warranting the following corrective...