NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6511 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the United States Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his narrative reason of separation be changed. The Board, consisting of Mr. Green, Mr. Spain, and Ms. White-Olson, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 13 November 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6512 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. In this regard, you were assigned the most appropriate reentry code based on your ‘circumstances. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6513 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 ES Docket No: 6513-14 4 May 2015 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW NAVAL RECORD OF QED USMC, XXxx-XX-Qip Ref : fa) 20 0.8.0.. 1552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 with attachments (2) Case summary (3) Subject's naval record 1. The Board, consisting of GUS viewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 23 April...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6513 14_Redacted
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 ES Docket No: 6513-14 4 May 2015 | From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records TOK secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW NAVAL RECORD OF EX-PVT ‘ be | | AXK-XK Ref: (a) 10 U.S.€. oF and 1eviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and iniuwbiies on 23 April 2015, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6514 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 November 2014.. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Subsequently, you were notified of pending administrative separation by reason of misconduct due to frequent involvement of a discreditable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6515 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S, COURTHOUSE ROAD, Suite 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204 JET Docket No. NR6515-14 § Jan 15 Prom: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Ref: {a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552 Enci: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) CNRC memo 1133 Ser N323 of 30 Oct 14 (3) Subject’s naval record 1.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6516 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 November 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior te making its decision in this case. Docket Wo.NKO6516-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an officiai faves record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6519 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 April 2015. Subsequently, administrative separation action was initiated by reason of fraudulent entry due to the diagnosed nocturnal enuresis. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6528 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 April 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6530 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 HCG Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to authorize reimbursement of Household Goods {HHG) storage. CONCLUSION Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6532 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 March 2015. Your application claims “The information that was available power point presentation that was located on the CMS/ID created > Incentive Pays Program Manager (PERS- 40 state en applying for Back-to-Back sea tour must submit their request 6-12 months prior to their original PRD.” However, the Board found that the OPNAV Policy Decision Memorandum (PDM)...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6533 14
You were advised via our letter dated 24 September 2013 (your case was Boarded 23 September 2013), that your aoplication had been denied. Documentary materials considered by the Board consisted of your applicaticn, together with all materials submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and pclicies. after careful and) conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board) found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to etablish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6535 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 June 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6537 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 August 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6538 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 November 2014. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6552 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY ARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECOF nae io 70 SUITE 1001 Dear Thiec i wour annlicratior . sate Ae f ‘ TALS s YOUr application C Ci y if 1 a Y rd and e il Tele - he - = ‘ In ad tt ird cons 3 dered N130C2/15UC of which v provided t Yr at icat mn Has Cl Wel Wil De that the c cannot be syed rea a+ Docket probable material error or injustice. Sincerely, ROBERT J. O'NEILL Executive Director Enclosure: OCNO memo 7220 Ser N130C2/15U0159 dtd 5 Feb 1 No.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6553 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 HCG Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to authorize reimbursement of travel in conjunction with separation from the service. CONCLUSION Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR656 14
TUR Docket No: 656-14 29 January 2015 your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of -the United States Code, section 1552, A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval session, considered your ; application on 28 January 2015. After careful consideration of your application, the Board concluded that your application was not timely filed, and that it would not be in the interest’ of justice to excuse your failure to submit your...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6561 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 March 2015. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in your case. NR6561-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR657 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 January 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6570 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 HCG Docket No. NR6570-14 15 Jan 15 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy , Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ico Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.c. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter .referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board - requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6581 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 March 2015. PERS-40DD, your SDIP request was approved 20 November 2013 but the message was not released until Docket No. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6589 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 June 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying fora correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6590 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a} Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that she elected maximum child only SBP coverage vice automatic spouse coverage prior to her date of retirement on 31 July 2009. The Board, consisting of ee reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 8 December 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6593 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 June 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6593 14_Redacted
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 June 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6599 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to retroactive Medical Board Certified Pay (BCP). The Board, consisting of Ms. Countryman, Mr. Bey, and Mr. Koman reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 19 November 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR660 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 January 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Nonetheless, your request was denied and the BCD was subsequently approved at all levels of review, and on 30 January 1976, you were so discharged.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6600 14
NEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 §. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, nereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with thig Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to adjust entitlement to Basic Allowance for Housing (BAH). The Board, consisting of Mr. Zsalman, Mr. George, and Mr. Ruskin, reviewed Petitioner’ s allegations of error and injustice on 30 June 2014 and, pursuant to its...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6607 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in your case. NR6607-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR661 14
A three- member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting an executive session, considered your application on 7 January 2015. — Finally, on10 October 1986, you received an other than honorable discharge by reason of misconduct ‘The Board, in its yeview of your entire record and application, 7 carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as your . New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in your case.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6610 14_Redacted
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 ES Docket No: 6610-14 29 July 2015 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records LO Secretary of the Navy ef: (a) 10 U.S.C. elie: sountcting ot reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 10 July 2015 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6611 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable - statutes, regulations and policies. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. NR6611-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6613 14
‘rom: Chairman, 7 CrArRe ae especi the ex (a) Title 1¢ (aj ok Form Sear ce cognizance a action. DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 5. COURTHOUSE ROAD.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6616 14
A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 June 2015. After careful consideration of your application, the Board concluded that your application was not timely filed, and that it would not be in the interest of justice to excuse your failure to submit your application ina timely manner. The Board determined that the reason you provided was insufficient to waive the statute of limitations and there is no...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6621 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 §. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 100° ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 G4--7mM - Crhanirma nAaKrA = Tarren - £ ON = Reacords From: Chairman, Boara =or Correction of Naval ner ras - a - Lo Secretary Ol Clit Wavy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO Form 149 w/attachments €@ February 2015 A pursuant to its regu rorrect 1VvE evidence O: Ted Bc : 2 The Boe = afe act : Sco 5 ~*~ ana <= its >. c. A copy of this Report of Proceedings will be filed...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6629 14
NR6629-14 27 Jan 5 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records TO: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be cor to issue an immediate reenlistment contract. Furthermore, any other immediate reenlistment contract executed by the Petitioner for the purpose of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR663 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to retroactive Special Duty Assignment Pay from 12 June 2007 to 12 June 2008 at a rate of $150.00 per month. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, George and Ruskin reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 11 August 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the partial...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6631 14_Redacted
5 U.S.C 552(b) (6)5 U.S.C 552(b) (6)5 U.S.C 552(b) (6)5 U.S.C 552(b) (6)5 U.S.C 552(b) (6)5 U.S.C 552(b) (6)
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6632 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 SJIN Docket No: 6632-14 12 Mav 2015 This is in reference to your application f record pursuant to the provisions of title Code, section 1552, or correction of your naval 10 of the United States a A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 May 2015. The names and votes of the members of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6633 14
d. Petitioner's application claims that on 20 January 2010 he signed a Page 13 (see enclosure (1)) agreeing “to complete four more years in the armed forces from the date that I request transferability of Post-9/11 GI Bill education benefits to my dependents." However, Petitioner claims that the Page 13 never made it into his Electronic Service Record (ESR) when he originally signed it in January 2010. b. Petitioner successfully submitted an online TEB request to transfer his Post-9/11 GI...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6637 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 §. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 100% ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 b. In correspondence e office -zance over the ijtioner'’s 1ias meri and D has commented tion.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6640 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 DIC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was entitled to payment of Involuntary Separation Pay (ISP) when she was discharged. The Board, consisting of @ reviewed Petitioner’s...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6644 14
COURTHOL ARLINGTON Docket No. NR6644-14 rc am #6 f4 ets] meval Consequently, when applying for @ corr cion of an officia- nave record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. LUM) OA ROBERT J. O'NEILL Rryecutive Director Enclosure: NPC memo 1160 Ser g12/0385 dtd 8 Dec 14 tw
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6647 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 May 2015. On 27 September 1972, you made a written request for discharge for the good of the service to avoid trial by court-martial for the forgoing period of UA totaling 241 days. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6650 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 § COURTHOUSE ROAD. Additionally, Petitioner acknowledged the following; “I understand that failure to complete my mandatory drilling obligation will result in removal of recommendation for future affiliation into the Navy Reserve. In accordance with DODINST 1205.21, members who fail to complete the required Selected Reserve service obligation will be subject to recoupment of the last incentive installment.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6666 14_Redacted
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 June 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6667 14_Redacted
Additionally, you petitioned the Board for reconsideration of your case and were advised in our letter of 23 October 1997, that your request had been denied. Your current request has been carefully examined by a three- member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session on 12 June 2015. Accordingly, your reconsideration request is denied.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR667 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S COURTHOUSE ROAD SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490 TLG Docket No: 0667-14 2 June 2015 This is in reference to your Application for Correction of Military Record, DD Form 149, dated 8 January 2015. You have requested that this Board review and remove the nonjudicial punishment (NJP) you received on 14 March 2014. In this regard, a thorough review of your official military personnel file (OMPF) does not reveal the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6672 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to add the Loan Repayment Program (LRP) to his enlistment guarantees. The Board, consisting of Ms. Bianchi, Mr. Vogt, and Mr. Ruskin, ' reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 7 October 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below...