NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6422 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S, COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490 BAN Docket No.NR06422-14 16 December 2014 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO qui Ref: {a} Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Subject...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6423 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.. New evidence is evidence’ not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6424 11
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 ES:tld Docket No: 6424-11 16 April 2015 This is in reference to your Application for Correction of Military Records, DD Form 149, dated April 24, 2014, in which you requested the record be corrected to reflect a change of your last name on. your Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty (DD Form 214). In this regard, you may wish to contact Headquarters,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6427 14_Redacted
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together ae ele EL material submitted in support thereof, your husband’s naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and polici s BR three-member panel of the Board for Correc e sessi at ] After careful and conscie 1 entire record, the Board found t evi e cl Ss insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice Your ‘husband enlisted in the Navy and began a period of active duty...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6428 14
* DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490 BAN Docket No,.NR06428-14 16 December 2014 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO _, nas . Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1} with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Subject had no eligible spouse for...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6429 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 November 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6430 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 April 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6431 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 October 2014. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant relief in your case because of the seriousness of your repetitive misconduct which resulted in numerous punitive actions and your request for discharge. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6431 14_Redacted
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 October 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6432 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure {1} with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show she enlisted in paygrade E-3, vice E-1. If petitioner was eligible for, but did not take the E-4 examination in September 2013, March 2014 and September 2014 because the above change had not yet been made, the following procedures will apply to remediate that missed opportunity. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6433 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 April 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in your case.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6435 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on “210 December 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. NR6435-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6437 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 April 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6438 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 5. Pursuant to the provisions of reference {a} Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that she is entitled to an Enlisted Special Selection Board for the FY-15 Reserve E-8 Selection Board. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6440 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 5. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 February 2015. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6441 14
Your application claims, “I was eligible to transfer to the Flee. Reserve Pemruary oe 2011. iL was stationed at the Navy Personnel Command (NPC) at the time the Post 9/11 GI (Bjiii was enacted and consulted several individuals prior to electing to transfer to the Fleet Reserve.” Petitioner further claims that “one of those individuals was a person responsible for the approval to transfer eligibility for all Navy members at NPC. This letter states that I had an active duty date obligation...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6442 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 January 2015. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memo 5420 PERS-80 dtd 19 Nov 14, a copy of which is attached. NR6442-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6445 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY <> BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS i j 701 §. Nr6445-14 5 Jan 15 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Ref: (a), Title 10 U.S.C, 1552 Enel: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments {2} CNRC memo 1133 Ser N323 of 22 Oct 14 (3) Subject's naval record 1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6447 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, an enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his naval record be corrected by removing any and all references regarding imposition of a nonjudicial punishment (NUP) for willful disobedience. In this regard, these AOs recommend Petitioner's request be denied because he did receive NJP on 11 May 2007, and was properly issued an adverse FITREP as a result of the NUP. REED Recorder S....
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6448 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 1001 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD SUI ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 2G C i: ier €& consideration of all of re d the contents 2) a 1 Board finds an injustice warranti the following rective RECOMMENDATION : That Petitioner's naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show that: > The DPotirinneYr avaniten 2 written wamiant Fax neaniewes as Exam - c spouse to former spouse SBP coverage, ab Ele mame jeves Of Coverage as previously elected,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6449 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to modify an immediate reenlistment contract. The Board, consisting of 1 _g/ ‘reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 8 December 2614 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should ‘be taken on the available evidence of record. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6450 14
The Board, consisting of Messrs. Grover, Rothlein and Clemmons, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 10 December 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Pursuant to Section 6 (c) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that quorum was present at the Board's review and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6451 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 April 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6452 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 April 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6453 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 November 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6454 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 TLG Docket No: 6454-14 30 April 2015 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, séction. A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 April 2015. The Board determined that the reason you...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6455 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 7071S. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he was honorably discharged from the Naval Reserve effective 5 February 2004 vice 1 July 2010. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, George and Ruskin reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 11 August 2014 and, pursuant to its...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR646 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of ~ your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in your case. Consequently, when applying For a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6460 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 April 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6463 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 April 2015. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in your case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material exror or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6468 14
{ ) al r a) ¢ a Tm 6d \ > gus oO 4 t cd ie) ) i ) r AUT) oti C { QO -d C ay) ty 43 GS o S es b Docket No. Members who are retired are not eligible to cransfer your education benefits. The Board found that there was not revision to the Post-9/11 GI Bill law or policy in December 2009 as you claim.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR647 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 October 2014. Nevertheless, you submitted a request for reenlistment which was denied due to an unfavorable endorsement from your chain of command. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden ig on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6478 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 April 2015. The Board further found that you attended the Naval Science 401 class that was rescheduled for 7 September 2012 by showing up and signing for a textbook for the class. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6479 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that their other than honorable discharge of 30 November 1984, be changed. The Board, consisting RE Re ee GUMB,s seviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 24 April 2015 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. In view of the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6484 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference {a), Petitioner, an enlisted member of the United States Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the Record of Unauthorized Absence (NAVPERS 1070/606) dated 14 October 2003 be - removed from his record. The Board, consisting of Mr. Clemmons, Mr. Ivins, and Ms. Tollefson, reviewed: Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 16 October 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6486 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 January 2015. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6487 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RE anne 704 S. COURTHOUSE ROAC, Suite 700 ARLINGTON, VA 22204 to Dorchester, MA on the Reenlistment contrace > signed 2007 CONCLUSION SSS “oom a — RECOMMENDATION : That Petitioner's naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show that: a. On 4 August 2007 when Petitioner signed and executed his Tummcdiale Reenlisctivene Sonbract 10 wWiich he VeEenLisSted Gu 4 Auguer 2007 for a period of 3 years with an expiration euu Uace ~ August...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6490 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the- applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner's Date of Rank to CWO3 be corrected to show a date of 1 October 2013 vice 1 November 2013, now of record. © 2, The Board, consisting of Mr. Fxnicios, Ms. McCain and Ms. Aldrich reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 5 November 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined ‘that the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6491 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by modifying the enlisted performance evaluation report for 16 June 2010 to 15 June 2011 {copy at Tab A) to change the rate from YN3 (pay grade B-4) to YN2 (pay grade E-5). The Board, consisting of Messrs. Hicks, Spooner and Swarens, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 18...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6492 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure {1} with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to retroactive Non-physician Board Certified Pay (BCP) from 21 July 2008 to 30 September 2012. The Board, consisting of Ms. Countryman, Mr. Bey, and Mr. Koman reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 19 November 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6493 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 January 2015. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6494 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 January 2015. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. NR6494-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.. el ROBERT J. O'NEILL Executive Director Enclosure: NPC...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6498 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 May 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6501 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 April 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or IjUustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6502 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 TLG Docket No: 6502-14 30 April 2015 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 April 2015. After careful consideration of your...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6503 14
mop + it v DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL REVURLS TOS. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish eligibility to transfer Post- 9/11 GI Bill benefits to his dependents. The Board, consisting of Mr. Ruskin, Mr. George, ynicios, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error a injustice on 2 September 2014...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6504 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 April 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6508 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 TLG Docket No: 6508-14 30 April 2015 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 April 2015. After careful consideration of your...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6509 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S, COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 TLG Docket No: 6509-14 30 April 2015 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 April 2015. After careful consideration of your...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6510 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter - referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone "A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus - (SRB). The Board, consisting 0 _i py reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 20 January 2015 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...