NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5920 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Navai Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 July 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in Support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5922 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 July 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5926 14
———E——— EL SS DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 TLG Docket No: 5926-14 3 June 2015 naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 June 2015. After careful consideration of your application, the Board concluded that your application...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5928 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, rogether with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5929 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 TLG Docket No: 5929-14 18 May 2015 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 May 2015. After careful consideration of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5930 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 TLG Docket No: 5930-14 3 June 2015 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 June 2015. The Board determined that the reason you...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5931 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 June 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5935 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page ll ("Administrative Remarks (1070)") entry dated 5 March 2013 and. CONCLUSION: Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosures (2) and (3), the Board finds the existence of an error and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5936 14
Petitioner claims that “ I reviewed the message about SDIP and found that I still qualify since I am not getting paid (Frocked) for E-6 and because of my promotion I can fulfill my orders and complete the minimum requirement of 24 months to be able to receive SDIP.” However, enclosure (1) is the only documentary evidence Petitioner submitted to support his claim of why he felt he was eligible for the SDIP. By the time Petitioner’s HYT was approved and he found out his HYT would only have...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5937 14
A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 May 2015. After careful consideration of your application, the Board concluded that your application was not timely filed, and that it would not be in the interest of justice to excuse your failure to submit your application ina timely manner. Specifically, you provided a statement that “you discovered that cases such as yours should have...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5940 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. On 31 May 1978 you were convicted by civil authorities of aggravated robbery.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5942 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 June 2015. With regard to your assertion, the Board determined that there was insufficient evidence, and you submitted none, to support a conclusion that your record is in error because you were not issued a medical alert tag. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5943 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 July 2014. In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB}, dated 5 May 2014, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5944 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 June 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. The Board liberally considered whether your PTSD was a causative factor in the misconduct that resulted in your discharge.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5944 14_Redacted
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 June 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5947 14
A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 January 2015. your allegations of error and reason of misconduct, and you were so discharged on 2 March 1995. The Board could not find any indication in the available records or your application that you were unfit for service by reason of physical disability at the time of your discharge. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5948 14
NE5948-14 2 Dec 14 From: Chairmen, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to modify an immediate reenlistment contract. The Board, consisting of F : reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 1 December 2014 and, pursuant to its...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5949 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive ‘session, considered your application on 19 March 2015. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5950 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 §. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner’s agreement to extend enlistment in the Inactive Manpower and Personnel Management Information System (IMAPMIS) . The Board, consisting See reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 1 December...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5952 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 JDR Docket No: 5952-14 28 May 2015 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 May 2015. After careful consideration of your application, the Board concluded that your application was...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5953 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to rescind transfer to the Volunteer Training Unit (VTU). reviewed Petitioner's allegations of e c 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5955 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 JDR Docket No: 5955-14 28 May 2015 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 May 2015. After careful consideration of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5973 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 June 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5982 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 June 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. With regard to your assertions, the Board considered whether being threatened was a causative factor in the misconduct that resulted in your discharge.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5986 14
A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 May 2015. After careful consideration of your application, the Board concluded that your application was not timely filed, and that it would not be in the interest of justice to excuse your failure to submit your application in a timely manner. Specifically, you provided a statement that “you were told that you could never get an upgrade and you saw no need to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5989 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5990 14
NR5990-14 hh Under these circumstances, the Board found that no reli is warranted. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable ma erial error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5991 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 June 2015. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in your case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5992 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 January 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5993 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner received credit in payment ang in reserve points for a total of four reserve drills he attended on 21 and 26 November 2013. ‘The Board, consisting of Mr. Exnicios, Ms. McCain and Ms. Aldrich reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 5 November 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5994 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 ES Docket No: 5994-14 29 July 2015 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW NAVAL RECORD OF , USMC, XXX-XX- Ref: (a) 10: 0. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, the assignment of an reenlistment...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5995 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490 BAN Docket No.NRO5995-14 5 December 2014 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: (REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Qari Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner advanced to....
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6000 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 March 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6001 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1091 ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490 BAN Docket -_No.NRO6001-14 16 December 2014 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD 1CO Si meee Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.c. 1552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments {2) Survivor Benefit Plan Program Manager Casualty Assistance Section, (PERS-13) of 4 Nov 2014 1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a)...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6005 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in your case. NR6005-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6008 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure {1} with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to remove the Loan Repayment Program (LRP) from his enlistment guarantees. NR6008-14 finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective action. Option (2) of Annex A to the DD Form 4 reflects "N/A", vice “Loan Repayment Program (LRP) Up to $65,000".— All other...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6009 14
A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 May 2015. After careful consideration of your application, the Board concluded that your application was not timely filed, and that it would not be in the interest of justice to excuse your failure to submit your application ina timely manner. Specifically, you provided no reason for waiving the statute of limitations.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6014 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 December 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. NkRé014-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6033 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 June 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR604 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 February 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Your request for discharge was granted and on 3 March 1970, you received an other than honorable discharge for the good of the service in lieu of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6063 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that she was entitled to Special and Incentive Pays as a result of her attending a Navy Active Duty Delay for Specialist (NADDS) Program. Docket No.NRO6063-14 RECOMMENDATION: That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, as follows: a. Petitioner was authorized the Special and Incentive Pay(s) as a result of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6064 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 May 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6066 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 November 2014. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by OCNO Memo 7220 Ser Wi30C/14U1348 dated 15 October 2014, a copy of which was sent to you on 18 October 2014; it was returned to sender on 5 November 2014. De Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6067 14
A three- member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 June 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6068 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enciosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-5/MA2 £rom the February 2013 Navy-wide Reserve advancement exam. The Board, consisting of Mr. Vogt, Mr. Ruskin, and Ms. Bianchi reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 7 October 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that che corrective action indicated below...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6070 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on . New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6072 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, an enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure {1} with this Board requesting that her naval record be corrected by removing any and all references to the nonjudicial punishment (NOP) imposed on 5 March 2012. Tne punishment imposed was reduction to paygrade E-3, reduction to Grey Belt, a $1,868 forfeiture of pay, and extra duty for 30 TUR Docket No: 6072-14 days. e. An advisory opinion from HOMC JPL, enclosure (4),...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6073 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject’s widow, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner made a claim for Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) annuity payments within six years following his date of death. The Board, consisting a and lt reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and 1 Stice on 20 April 2015 and, pursuant to its regulations,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6075 14
Evidence is considered to be material if it is likely to have a substantial effect on the outcome of the Board’s decision, On 16 April 2014, our office received your reconsideration request dated 9 April 2014, requesting a reconsideration of your case based on new and material information you provided (a response to the original advisory opinion). Therefore, a three- member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR608 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION 701 S. COURTHOUSE R OF NAVAL RECORDS TUR . Docket No: 608-14 29 January 2015 timely mann excuse your failure to submit your application-in a er. Specifically, YOu provided no reason asa basis the statute of limitations, As a result, the Board You-may request reconsideration of this decision within one year Board's decision, However, your request ROBERT.