NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5734 14
Enclosures {1) through (3) apply. rebuttal dated 6 April 2009. d. An AO, “enclosure (4), received from the HOMC Military Personnel Law Branch, regarding Petitioner’s request to remove the documents which references the NJP recommends relief. In this regard, and especially in light of the favorable AO, the Board substantially concurs with the comments contained in the AO and concludes that in the absence of the NUP document, the documentation referencing it, as it appears in the record,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5737 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 HD Docket No. NR5737-14 29 January 2015 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy subj: EE osc, oo a REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (ay 16 0.8
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5740 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 January 2015. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in your case. NR5S740-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5748 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting a change in his RE-4 (Ineligible for reenlistment) reentry code which was issued on 6 August 2004. The Board, consisting of GWM, ceviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 27 May 2015 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. As such he...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5751 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 June 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given the seriousness of your...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5755 14
A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 May 2015. After careful consideration of your application, the Board concluded that your application was not timely filed, and that it would not be in the interest of justice to excuse your failure to submit your application ina timely manner. Specifically, you provided the statement “To be able to apply for medical benefits through the Veterans...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5756 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS fU7 5S. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the Petitioner reenlisted and is eligible for advancement under the provisions of the Selective Training and Reenlistment (STAR) program. ‘The Board, consisting of Qa reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5757 14
A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 May 2015. To my surprise I discovered the discharge document.” as the basis for waiving the statute of limitations. The Board determined that the reason you provided was insufficient to waive the statute of limitations and there is no evidence provided that indicates you were unable to file your application within the three years from when you learned of your...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR576 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In your case, the Board found misconduct and aggravating factors.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5770 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 May 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Subsequently, administrative discharge action was initiated by reason of misconduct due to wrongful drug use.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5771 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure {1} with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to authorize payment for Personal Property Movement (PPM) claim. The Board, consisting of Mr. Chapman, Mr. Lippolis and Mr. Midboe, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 6 Nov 14 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5772 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 &. Pursuant to the provisions of reference {a} Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to modify an immediate reenlistment contract. The Board, consisting of r reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 1 December 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5773 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 January 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5800 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BUARLD FUR GURRECTION OF IWAVAL RECURS ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 DIC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to modify Petitioner’s Home-of-Selection. The Board, consisting of Mr. Ruskin, Mr. Exnicios, and Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 2 September 2014 and,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR583 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 February 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Subsequently, administrative discharge action was initiated by reason of misconduct due to wrongful drug use.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5840 14
DEPARTMENT Or THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S, COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 DIC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to modify an immediate reenlistment contract. The Board, consisting of QE ee reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 1 December 2014 and,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5841 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 $, GOURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 100 ARLINGTON. VA 22204-249( JET Docket Ne VWR5841-14 2 Feb 15 THiS is in rete naval record pursuant to the provisions o 1 J f 10 USC 1552 A three-member panel of the Board for Corr of Naval Records, sitting in executive session considered your application on 2 February al fou n reviewed in roceaures Cc 2 a a oO = oO RK 7 Omer nN K @ mM WQ UNS S mn ) ct Ls Oo HD m wu ot) 9 a © Bo Documentary material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5843 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 February 2015. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinions from Headquarters Marine Corps dated 14 _ November and 11 December 2014, copies of which are attached, After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5845 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 May 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5847 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 BIC Docket No. ‘Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subdere, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish an Expiration of Obligated Service (BOS) . " A copy of this Report of Proceedings will be filed in Petitioner's naval record.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5848 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 May 2015. Subsequently, administrative discharge action was initiated by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant changing the reason for your discharge or recharacterization of your discharge given your three NJPs, and the fact that you were warned of the consequences of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5850 14_Redacted
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 SIN Docket No: 5850-14 19 June 2015 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records TS: Headquarters Marine Corps Ref: (a) 10 UseSeCe. SIN Docket No: 5850-14 d. In his application, Petitioner asserts that he had Post- Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) at the time of his service that was the cause of his misconduct. This evidence led the Board to reasonably conclude...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5854 14
Pursuant to the provisions of yveference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to modify an immediate reenlistment contract. the existence of an injustice warran the evidence of record, and of enclosure (2), the Board finds ting the following corrective pocket No. (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6{(e)) and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5857 14
A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 June 2015. After careful consideration of your application, the Board concluded that your application was not timely filed, and that it would not be in the interest of justice to excuse your failure to submit your application in timely manner. Specifically, you provided no reason for waiving the statute of limitation other than “after boot camp things in...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5859 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 June 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR586 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 February 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Additionally, you were counseled and warned after your third NOP, that further misconduct could result in administrative discharge action.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5861 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memo 1780 PERS-312 dated 28 January 2015, a copy of which is attached. NR5861-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5863 14
A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 June 2015. After careful consideration of your application, the Board concluded that your application was not timely filed, and that it would not be in the interest of justice to excuse your failure to submit your application in timely manner. Specifically, you provided no reason for waiving the statute of limitation.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5864 14
NT i] F THE NAVY ACO ADOTA wit in POARD FOR COR ection OF NAVAL REG! Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board also considered the advisory opinion furnished by Navy Personnel Command (NPC) memo 5420 PERS-806 of 17 Jul 2014, @ copy of which was provided to you on 1.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5865 14_Redacted
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together ith all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, applicable statutes, regulations, You enlisted in the Marine Corps iod of active duty on 28 April 1969. Further, the Board concluded that you received the benefit of your bargain with the Marine Corps when your request for discharge was granted and should not be permitted to change it now. New evidence is evidence not previously considered...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5867 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 May 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5870 14
Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequentiy, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5872 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 October 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5874 14
1 of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, considered your application on or and injustice were reviewed BR three-member pane sitting in executive session, 12 March 2015. your allegations of err in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. in addition, the Boarc considered the advisory opinion furnisned by the Nevy Personnel Command dated 2 October 2014 with enclosure, @ copy o- which is azvvached. Consequently, when...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5880 14_Redacted
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 June 2015. After applying these guidelines to the evidence in the case, the Board was not able to substantiate the existence of PTSD in your case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5881 14
NAVY E DEPARTMENT OF TH a u r £ E 1 4 ‘ 4 i Go 4 Gb ne Bo 4H O ) { ‘ 4 1 Amini SAUL ii) p=) { Oa HOG YO py « n T wv a un) Oo im Oo ore O rp Oo @ on a 1 a a PA dd UO 4 vo cD ~ 2 oO OH S Q Vv G& Ox dh Pp ow OH id ume U2 crorde: oe Ny Rea rant Will comments ished 1 publ ns ulLatio ni er rTeTnd fit crewW1y re actly ad my ) memir a lectio Docket No. NR586i-14 who are retired are not eligible to transfer their education benefits. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5886 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 June 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5890 14
WRO5890-14 28 October 2014 This is in reference to your appiication for correction to your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 United States A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 October 2014. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5899 14
1 \ o M H " o 3 ; cs c = . et oO ) { 1 v | oO Vv a 'O a ‘ { ct Pa a 13 a os { a J p = se ) w ¢ va OU wW 4 s 4 ud : a 1 1 O 4H Sak oO = cg a 4 Hw OO ms ‘ ul 1) $4 i oO a ee ' q U oO iJ Y a 3 i ~ w ae a y w oO ) \ , ec ; O & /) — eH ri ++ 4 1 } ans QO . oO ¢ 2 yw cof x ci a4 a 1 O-4 Oo x $} G@ O M 2 oO =A YD i io i) ri = O WH © + m4 ~~ = r { > = > = O-d ia Bon © - > za ou mM WO cl » 3 wa w oan it a Hoo @ y Oc e 1 HG El le Za HOW 6 an.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5900 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 May 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5902 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner's Date of Rank to CDR/05 be corrected to 1 November 2013, all pay and benefits adjusted to correspond to the new CDR/05 Date of Rank, and be awarded the Joint Qualified Officer. The Board, consisting of @__ey aly reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 8 December 2014 and, pursuant to its...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5903 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 May 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5905 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 May 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In your case, you engaged in homosexual acts onboard a Naval vessel, which is sufficient even under current standards to warrant an OTH discharge.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5906 14
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNPC memo 1430 Ser 812/0339 of 29 Oct 14, a copy of which is attached and was also previously provided to Petitioner. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5907 14
A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 May 2015. Specifically, you provided the statement “Because of my youth I made a mistake and I’m willing to admit it at this time,” as the basis for waiving the statute of limitations. You may request reconsideration of this decision within one year from the date of the Board’s decision.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5908 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 May 2015. Subsequently, you were notified of pending administrative separation action by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5915 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 7015S. In enclosure (3}, the HOMC Counseling and Evaluation Section has commented to the effect that Petitioner’s request to remove his failure of selection to major has merit and warrants favorable action. CONCLUSION: Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of enclosure (3), the Board finds an injustice warranting the following corrective action: RECOMMENDATION: a.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5917 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 June 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5918 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5919 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 §. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) . CONCLUSION Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the...