NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6087 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 August 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in Support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official “naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6088 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 March 2015. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6093 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 January 2015. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. NR6093-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6095 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS /U1 S. GUURTHUUSE RUAL, SUITE 1007 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 BIC Docket No. NR6095-14 2 Dec 14 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Sub} : REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO a Ref: {a} Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to’ the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1} with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6099 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1} with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected te bring up-to-date Petitioner's agreements to extend enlistment and immediate reenlistment contract, in both Official Military Personnel File (OMFP) and Inactive Manpower and Personnel Management Information System (IMAPMIS). The Board, consisting of Qs ee, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6102 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 March 2015. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6103 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 HCG Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be ccrrected to authorize reimbursement for a Personally Procured Move (PFM). CONCLUSION Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6108 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S, COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 SIN Docket No: 6108-14 18 September 2014 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records ‘To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD (ey Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. The Board, consisting of Mr. Clemmons, Mr. Spain, and Mr. Dixit, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 16 September 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR611 14
A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 January 2015. As a result, the Board was unable.to discern from your record or application why your application was filed 20 years after the statute of limitations had run. your’ application is not-possible.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6112 14
Members who are retired are nov eligible te transfer your education benefits. Your application claims, “I was not aware of the requirement to transfer the entitlement while I was on still ---* = erie AS eoranancry atrear on active duty....i becaue SWweee SE LALe aioarepan seeing an AFN commercial while overseas discussing GI Bill benefits which led me to pelieve that I had lost this benefit.” Your application further claims “I started terminal leave in July 2009 before the Post 9/11 GI Bill...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6114 14
Documentary materia considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. NR6114-14 a correction of an official naval he applicant to demonstrate the existence of Consequently, when applying for record, the burden is on t probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR612 14
A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 January 2015. record or application why your application * was filed 14 years after the atatute of limitations had run. discovered ‘relevant evidence which was not reasonable ‘available to you when-you submitted your application.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6122 14
A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 May 2015. After careful consideration of your application, the Board concluded that your application was not timely filed, and that it would not be in the interest of justice to excuse your failure to submit your application ina timely manner. Specifically, you provided a statement that “changes in your life for the good of humanity are a plus in your life and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6128 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS U1 5. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the Petitioner reenlisted and was eligible for advancement under the provisions of the Selective Training and Reenlistment (STAR) program. A copy of this Report of Proceedings will be filed in Petitioner's naval record.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6132 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 October 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Docket No.NRO6132-14 ction of an official naval to demonstrate the existence of plying E6r a Serre record, the burden is on the applicant Consequently, when ap probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6136 14
Your current request has been carefully examined by a three- member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session on 17 December 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your letters, any material submitted in support of your application, and your prior case file. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire recoré, the Board determined your letter, even though not previously considered by the Board, was insufficient...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6139 14
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice, Sincerely, ROBERT J. O'NEILL Executive Director DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAO, SUITE tool ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 HD Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR614 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he was advanced to LS1/E6 from the August 2012 Navy-wide Reserve advancement exam. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Ruskin and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 4 August 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6155 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corr to modify an immediate reenlistment contract. The Board, consisting of Mr. da injustice on reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error an 10 September 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6175 14
16 Apr 12 (6) Dependency Application/Record of Emergency Data dtd , 18 Mar 14 (7) DEERS printout (8) Order of Child Support No: 11-5-00103-1 dtd 4 Oct 12 (9) Dependency application/Record of emergency data dtd 6 Jun 13 : (10) DEERS printout (11) CD, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty effective 17 May 13 1. Moreover, Petitioner was married at the time he begin child support payments and his spouse was receiving the with-dependent housing allowance on behalf of all...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6179 14
This request was denied on 30 September 2013. #, three-member panel of the Board for correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, reconsidered your case on 22 January 2015. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6180 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 May 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. appropriate reentry code based on your » Situation.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6186 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with ail material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NSSC ltr 4050 Ser N42/144 dated 15 December 2014, a copy of which is attached. NR6186-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR621 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 February 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR621 14_Redacted
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 February 2015 . Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and pclicies. After applying these guidelines to the evidence in the case, the Board was not able to substantiate the existence o= PTSD in your case .
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6212 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS TI 7o7 €& COURTHOUSE ROAD 1004 ARLINGTON VA 22204- 2490 Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that the Reentry Code is returned to RE-2B on the DD Form 215. The Board, consisting of Mr. Ruskin, Mr. George, and Mr. Exnicios, reviewed Petitioner’s...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR622 14
A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 January 2015. After careful consideration of | your application, the Board concluded that your application was not timely filed, and that it would not be in the interest of justice to excuse your failure to submit your application in a timely manner. Specifically, you provided a statement that noted in part, that ‘your discharged was based on your first...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6229 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 June 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant relief in your case because of the seriousness of your misconduct,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR623 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1004 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 DIC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure {1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show restoration.of accrual leave. The Board, consisting of Mr. Zsalman, Mr. George, and Mr. Ruskin, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6238 14
-eacT Khar cnan cognizant BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RE 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD. SUITE 100° ARLINGTON. VA 22204-2490 ARS BES ee £ ytn--- regulations, det ication my werant favorable Me td Upon review and cons especiail the - n light ristence D bh t ideration of all tt of the contents ot qjustice warranting the RECOMMENDATION : Oop C mon of 1€ T Was PLL DEeraAat / ~ | OM.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6240 14
NR62406-14 9 Dec 14 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ico Te“ Ref: {a) Title 10 U.S.C. record he corrected to cancel an immediate reenlistment contract. The Board, consisting of reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 8 December 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR625 14
A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 January 2015. After careful consideration of your application, the Board concluded that your application was not timely filed, and that it would not be in the interest of justice to excuse your failure to submit your application in a ‘timely manner. Specifically, you provided a statement that noted in part, that ‘you were discharged without much thought given...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6264 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 March 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6270 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 June 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Subsequently, you were notified of pending administrative separation by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse at which time you waived your procedural rights...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6276 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, Sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 July 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in Support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6288 14
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinions from Headquarters Marine Corps (HOMC) dated 17 November and 18 December 2014, copies of which are attached. evidence not previously considered by the Board its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6289 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 §, COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 DIC Docket No. NR6289-14 3 Mar 15 From: Chairman, Board for Correction cf Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO Ref: ta) Pitle 10 U.S
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR629 14
A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 January 2015. After careful consideration of your application, the Board concluded that your application was not timely filed, and that it would not be in the interest of justice to excuse your failure to Submit your application in a timely manner. Specifically, you provided a statement that noted in part, that ‘you were unaware of the process regarding...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6292 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 761 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 DIC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to modify an immediate reenlistment contract, and cancel agreements to extend enlistment. The Board, consisting of reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6293 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 5. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be ecrrected to show correct date of rank (DOR). The Board, consisting of reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 28 January 2015 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6295 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 707 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 bIC Docket No. (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB). NR6295-14 RECOMMENDATION: That Petitioner‘s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show that: a.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6298 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 October 2014. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6299 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 June 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR630 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his RE-30 (orders refusal) reentry code, issued on 28 December 2013, be changed. The Board, consisting of Mr. Zsalman, and Mr. Tew, and Ms. White-Olson, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 18 June 2014, and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the partial corrective action indicated...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6300 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 June 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6303 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 §. NRE203-14 RECOMMENDATION: That Petitioner's naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show that: a. The Petitioner executed an officer Appointment Acceptance and Oath or ULrice (NAV PERS 1O0G/4) wae OL Soeur o Antobes 2012 wice 29 - Ve eee OT -_~-= December 2013.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6307 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 February 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6308 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 June 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6310 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 July 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, his naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6314 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 May 2015. Subsequently, you were notified of pending administrative separation by reason of misconduct due to pattern of misconduct at which time you waived your procedural rights to consult with legal counsel and to present your case to an administrative discharge board (ADB). Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden...