NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5594 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 EGA Docket No: 5594-14 19 May 2015 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 May 2015. After careful consideration of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5595 14
A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 May 2015. After careful consideration of your application, the Board concluded that your application was not timely filed, and that it would not be in the interest of justice to excuse your failure to submit your application ina timely manner. Specifically, you stated “to care for him who shall have borne the battle and for his widow and his orphan” as a reason...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5596 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS FGi &. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject's wicow, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show enrollment in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) pursuant to the BARBER decision. -2, The Board, consisting of reviewed Petitioner‘’s allegations of error and injustice on 1 December 2014 and, pursuant to its...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5597 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 May 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted ‘of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5598 14
Your current request has been carefully examined by a three- member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, any material submitted in support of your application, and your previous case file. Consequently, when _applying for a correction of an official record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5599 14
A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 May 2015. After careful consideration of your application, the Board concluded that your application was not timely filed, and that it would not be in the interest of justice to excuse your failure to submit your application ina timely manner. Specifically, you stated “did not know I needed upgrade for access to medical services” as a reason for waiving the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5601 14
A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 May 2015. Specifically, you stated “I served two years good time” as a reason for waiving the statute of limitations. You may request reconsideration of this decision within one year from the date of the Board’s decision.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5602 14
A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 May 2015. After careful consideration of your application, the Board concluded that your application was not timely filed, and that it would not be in the interest of justice to excuse your failure to submit your application ina timely manner. Specifically, you provided no reason as a basis for waiving the statute of limitations.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5603 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference {a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to cancel an immediate reenlistment contract. The Board, consisting of QI ae reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 1 December 2014 and, pursuant to:its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5604 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BQARD FOP CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS ar RA IDTLIOLICE ROAD. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to an Enlistment Bonus for Source Rate (EBSR) . 2, The Board, consisting of MS. Bianchi, Mr. Vogt, ana Mr. Ruskin, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injus October 2014 and,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5605 14
NR5605-14 2 Dec 14 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj]: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO Ref: {a} Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the Petitioner declined enrollment in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). The Board, consisting of (i reviewed Petitioner's...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5607 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, Sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 May 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies, After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5621 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 April 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an Siiieia) naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5623 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereor, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. in this regard, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion. consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5624 14
Pursuant to its regulations, the Board determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. His transfer fitness report from RS Harrisburg, for 1 January to 13 July 2013 (copy at enclosure (1)), was fully favorable, even though the reporting senior, the Commanding Officer (CO), RS Harrisburg, requested Petitioner’s RFC on 12 April 2013, and the reviewing officer, the CO, First Marine Corps District, favorably endorsed the request on 26...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5626 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5S June 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5630 14
A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 May 2015. After careful consideration of your application, the Board concluded that your application was not timely filed, and that it would not be in the interest of justice to excuse your failure to submit your application in a timely manner. Specifically, you provided no reason as a basis for waiving the statute of limitations.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5631 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 May 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5632 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 EGA Docket No: 5632-14 19 May 2015 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 May 2015. After careful consideration of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5634 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 May 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant relief in your case, given the seriousness of your misconduct and you were not...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5635 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference f(a} Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable navai record be corrected +o authorize payment for Personally Procured Move Claim. CONCLUSTON Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective action. c, A copy of this...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5636 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his RE-4 reentry code, issued on 14 March 2014, be changed. Although his medical records were not available for review, enough evidence existed to show that he was diagnosed with a medical condition interfering EGA Docket No: 5636-14 with the performance of his duties and that he was recommended for administrative separation due to a condition...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5637 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5638 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 EGA Docket No: 5638-14 19 May 2015 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 May 2015. After careful consideration of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5639 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 May 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5641 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS (U1 8. ‘Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner's Home of Record (HOR) was changed to Vero Beach, FL. The Board, consisting of acne EE qm, veviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 4 December 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5642 14
A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 May 2015. After careful consideration of your application, the Board concluded that your application was not timely filed, and that it would not be in the interest of justice to excuse your failure to submit your application ina timely manner. Specifically, you provided a statement that “the passage of time does not lessen the error or injustice” asa reason for...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5645 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 May 2015. The Board, in its review of your entire record and application, carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as your record of service, desire to upgrade your discharge, and your assertion that you suffered a traumatic head injury while serving in the Marine Corps. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5648 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to authorize reimbursement of Personally Procured Move (PPM). CONCLUSION Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective action, Docket No. c, A...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5649 14
A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 May 2015. After careful consideration of your application, the Board concluded that your application was not timely filed, and that it would not be in the interest of justice to excuse your failure to submit your application in a timely manner. Specifically, you provided a statement that “although your actions were unlawful, you feel that you deserve leniency...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5650 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 June 2015. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in your case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5653 14
A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 May 2015. After careful consideration of your application, the Board concluded that your application was not timely filed, and that it would not be in the interest of justice to excuse your failure to submit your application ina timely manner. Specifically, you provided a statement that “your mental state was found unfit and you have done everything in your...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5654 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 §. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that petitioner wag advanced to E-4 from the February 2013 Navy-wide advancement 2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zealman, Ruskin and George reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 9 June 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5656 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 June 2015. Finally, with regard to your assertions, the Board noted that your NUP was appropriately documented in your official military personnel file in accordance with applicable regulations and there is no error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5657 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in Support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. With regard to your assertion, the Board noted that your record contains documentation which reflects that you were notified in writing of the recommend you for discharge whit an under other than honorable characterization of service. Additionally, you initialed your Certificate of Release...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5659 15
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 JDR Docket No: 5659-14 28 May 2015 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 May 2015. After careful consideration of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5667 14
on 4 September 2014, you have requested a reconsideration of your case. evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an, official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5674 14
AR three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 December 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. NR5674-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5675 14
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5676 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Te 100 701 S GOURTHOUSE ROAL. in this regara, is important to keep in mind that a presumption attaches to all official records Consequently Docket No. NR5676-14 for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5677 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5679 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference {a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing his failure of selection by the Fiscal Year (FY) 2015 Major Selection Board and granting him consideration by a special selection board (SSB) for the FY 2014 Major Selection Board. “Consequently, the logical implication was that the petitioner was passed over for promotion every year...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR568 14
Despite your claim of PTSD, the Board determined it insufficient to warrant relief since there is no evidence in the record to support it, and you submitted none. The Board also concluded that you received the benefit of your bargain with the Marine Corps when your request for discharge was granted and should not be permitted to change it now. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in your case.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR568 14_Redacted
Although your appli cation was not filed in a timely manner, the Board found it in the interest of jus t ice to waive the statute of limitations and consider your ~pplication on its merits _ A three - member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in execut ive session, considered your application on 3 February 2015 . Regarding your claim of PTSD, the Board may only consider assertion of PTSD when an applicant Rresents clear evidence that the PTSD is service connected...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5680 14
Your current request has been carefully examined by a three- member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, any material submitted in support of your application, and prior case file. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board determined the medical notes you submitted, © even though not previously considered by the Board,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5683 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 June 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. The Board did not have any evidence to support an error or injustice that would require your reinstatement to the TDRL.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5691 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 TAL Docket No: 5691-14 1 June 2015 This is in reference to your Application for Correction of Military Record, (DD Form 149), in which you requested the record be corrected to reflect that you were issued a Purple Heart, a Presidential Unit Citation and a Meritorious Unit Citation, on your Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty (DD Form 214). In this regard,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5730 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5731 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S, COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 DIC Docket No. NR5731-14 1 Apr 15 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C, 1552 Encl: . Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record he...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5732 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner had 20 qualifying years for a non-regular Reserve retirement. The Board, consisting of WHE ev iewea Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 19 November 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. ...