NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4376 14_Redacted
A three- member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 Aprii 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all macerial submitted in support thereof, your naval record, anc applicable statutes, regulations, and policies, After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4378 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to ag Petitioner, fiied enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was entitled to payment of Involuntary Separation Pay (ISP) when he was discharged. The Board, consisting of Mr. Hedrick, Ms. Polk, and Mr. Sproul, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 18 November 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4379 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 April 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Subsequently, administrative discharge action was initiated by reason of misconduct due to wrongful drug use.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4381 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 April 2015. Documentary naberdall considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. This is especially true in your case because your CO’s decision to administratively separate you was based on facts and circumstances surrounding...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4382 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 April 2015. Subsequently, administrative discharge action was initiated by reason of misconduct due to wrongful drug use. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4383 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 December 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4385 14
Ee SSS Ser eae DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 TAL Docket No: 4385-14 6 May 2015 Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 April 2015. After careful consideration ot your application, the Board concluded that your application was not timely filed, and that it would not be in the interest of justice to excuse your failure to submit your application in a timely manner. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4386 14
NR4386-14 2 Dec 14 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO Ref: {a) Title 10 U.S.c. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred te as Petitioner, filed enclosure {1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to issue an immediate reenlistment contract. ‘ CONCLUSION Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4390 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 ‘oa WZ JDR Docket No: 4390-14 24 April 2015 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 April 2015. After careful consideration...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4392 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 April 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4393 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 April 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4394 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 October 2014. after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4395 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 April 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4396 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 October 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4397 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference fa) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval tecord be eorrected to establish entitlement to a zone “B” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) . The Board, consisting of Mr. Hedrick, Ms. Polk, and Mr. Sproul, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 18 November 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4398 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to authorize payment for Personally Procured Move Claim. The Board, consisting of Mr. Hedrick, Mr. Sproul and Ms. Polk, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 18 November 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below ghould be...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4399 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 SIN Docket No: 4399-14 24 April 2015 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Tor Commandant of the Marine Corps (MMMA) Subj: REVIEW NAVAL RECORD OF [iy sic, 002-30-7273 Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, an enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his record...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4400 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 November 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Docket MNo.NkKO44U0-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an ofiiciai naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4401 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to an Enlistment Bonus for Source Rate (EBSR) . The Board, consisting of Mr. Hedrick, Mr. Ruskin, and Ms. Wilcher, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 30 September 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4402 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 April 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4403 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 April 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Subsequently, you were notified of pending administrative separation by reason of misconduct at which time you waived your procedural rights to consult with...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4405 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 April 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Subsequently, you were notified of pending administrative separation by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse at which time you waived your procedural right to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4406 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to remove the Loan Repayment Program (LRP) from her enlistment guarantees. Ene corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Option (2) of Annex A to the (LRP) ".
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4407 14
A three-member panel cf the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 April 2015. Subsequently, administrative discharge action was initiatec by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4408 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 ys é be de taal Sern” JDR Docket No: 4408-14 29 April 2015 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 April 2015. After careful...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4410 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 April 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4417 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with ail material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Based on the psychological evaluation, your Commanding officer did not © recommend you for retention and recommended’ you for separation by reason of convenience of the government due to personality Gisorder. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4423 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 TAL Docket No: 4423-14 6 May 2015 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 April 2015. Specifically, you provided no reason...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4425 14
NR4425-14 19 Nov 14 , From:. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (i) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was entitled to payment of Involuntary Separation Pay (ISP) when he was discharged. It is certified that quorum was present at the Board’s review and deliberations, and that the foregoing 1s e,and complete record of the Board's proceedings in the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4426 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS an4.& SOURTHOUSF RO SUITE 1004 ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490 BAN Docket No.NR04426-14 15 October 2014 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Tow Secretary of the Navy Ret: (a) Title 10 U.s.c. -Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to H-6/YNi from the February 2013...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4427 14
A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 April 2015. Specifically, you provided a statement that “you were not in your right state of mind at the time” as a reason for waiving the statute of limitations. You may request reconsideration of this decision within one year from the date of the Board’s decision.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4428 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 November 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the ,existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4429 14
Documente the Board consisled of your appl ication, togethe1 material submitted in support thereol, your Neva applicable statutes, regulations, and policies and conse careful the to establish After record, found the evidence Board the existence yf probable injustice You enlisted in the Navy and began a period of act 25 September 2006. The NDPRB denied your request to upgrade the characterization of your discharge due to the seriousness of your misconduct. Consequently, when applying for a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4430 14
A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 April 2015. After careful consideration of your application, the Board concluded that your application was not timely filed, and that it would not be in the interest of justice to excuse your failure to submit your application in timely manner. Specifically, you provided no reason for waiving the statute of limitation.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4431 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, Filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to eredit back annual leave erroneously charged. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice, finds as follows: a. CONCLUSION Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4434 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 TAL Docket No: 4434-14 24 April 2015 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 Apr 2015. Specifically, you provided no reason...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4436 14
A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 April 2015. After careful consideration of your application, the Board concluded that your application was not timely filed, and that it would not be in the interest of justice to excuse your failure to submit your application in a timely manner. Specifically, you provided a statement that “you have been bothered by this since 1987 but have...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4443 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 November 2014. However, after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4445 14
hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the fitness report for 12 July to 7 November 2013 (copy at Tab A). Upon review and consideration of a especially in of an error and in RECOMMENDALLON: That Petitioner's naval recor a. a related material: Following fitness report an Period of Report From To Reporting Senior Date of Report 12 dul 13. RUSKIN Recorder BY Pursuant to the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4447 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. NR4447-14 for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4448 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 November 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. NR4448-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4449 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 December 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board ' prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4493 14
Zoe the Board, consisting of i eviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 5 May 2015, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the partial corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. However, on 18 February 1986, an administrative board convened for the purpose of considering allegations that Petitioner had demonstrated homosexual conduct. The separation authority approved and directed a general discharge due to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4494 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, an enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his naval record be corrected by removing any and all derogatory material referencing an administrative separation from the Delayed Entry Program (DEP) due to a positive urinalysis. The Board, consisting of [is MMMM reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 13 January 2015 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4497 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, with this Board requesting, in effect, that record be corrected to show that he was from the March 2013 Navy-wide advancement filed enclosure (1) the applicable naval advanced to E-5/FC2 cycle. NRO4497-14 CONCLUSION Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in Light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective action. S. Pursuant...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4498 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 April 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Although your BCD discharge was suspended for nine months on 25 June 1981, this suspension was vacated due to your continued misconduct, which...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4499 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval ord and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in your case. NR4499-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4500 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 November 2014. Five months later, on 11 July 1978, you were convicted by a special court-martial (SPCM) of two periods of UA totaling 78 days, and was sentenced to a $530 forfeiture of pay, reduction in pay grade, confinement for two months and a suspended bad conduct discharge (BCD). Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4502 14
RB three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 November 9014. in addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion from Headquarters Marine Corps dated 26 August after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was snsufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4503 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 May 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Subsequently, administrative discharge action was initiated by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.