NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4261 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S, COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 DJC Docket No. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. in addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion Furnished by NPC memo 1811 Pers- 835/070 dated 30 December 2014, a COpy of which was provided to you...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4263 14
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinions furnished by NPC dated 26 September 2014 with enclosure and 17 October 2014, copies of which are attached. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4265 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 March 2015. The member has official notification from the VA approving entitlement to disability compensation for the same illness or injury that caused the entitlement to disability severance pay.” The Board found no evidence that your meet any of the above exceptions. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4268 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 October 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously congidered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. when applying for a correction of an official naval Consequently, record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4269 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 April 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Subsequently, you were notified of pending administrative separation by reason of misconduct due to frequent involvement at which time you waived...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4271 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, chat the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner advanced to E-5/FT2 from the Mareh 2012 Navy-wide advancement examination. The Board, consisting of Mr. Ruskin, Mr. Vogt, and Ms. Bianehi reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 7 October 2014 and, pursuant, to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4273 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Nevertheless, the Board found that these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your diagnosed personality disorder. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4274 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 SIN Docket No: 4274-14 21 April 201 AN) This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 April 2015. After careful consideration...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4276 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 April 2015. After being afforded all of your procedural rights, you received an entry level separation due to erroneous enlistment on 24 February 1987. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4279 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 April 2015. On 15 July 1993, administrative discharge action was initiated by reason of misconduct due to wrongful drug use. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4280 14
A three-member panel of the Board for correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 November 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps, a COPY of which is atkached .
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4286 14
Additionally you requested an explanation as to why your “JFM1” separation code is different from your initial DD Form 214. Please be advised that because your request are for administrative corrections which do not require action by this Board, you may submit a request to Headquarters, United States Marine Corps, 3280 Russell Road, Quantico, VA 22134-5103, to request that administrative corrections be made on your DD Form 214. As a result of the foregoing, no action is required by...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4287 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to retroactive Medical Board Certification Pay (BCP) for the period of 1 duly 2010 through 30 September 2012. The Board, consisting of Mr. Vogt, Mr. Ruskin, and Ms. Bianchi reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 7 October 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined chat the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR429 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 November 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with ali material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. directed your commanding officer to issue you an other than honorable discharge by reason of misconduct, and on 17 August 2009, you were so discharged.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4292 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 August 2014. The Board found that your commanding officer's decision to impose the foregoing NJP, and the punishment imposed, was appropriate, and that it was administratively and procedurally correct. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official Naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4293 14
You requested removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)”) entry dated 23 October 2013 and your undated rebuttal. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 April 2015. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4294 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 April 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4295 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, Sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 April 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4296 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 April 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4296 14_Redacted
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, Sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 April 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4297 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 April 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4302 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 TAL Docket No: 4302-14 24 April 2015 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 April 2015. After careful consideration of your...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4304 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. The Board took into consideration your post service medical evaluations and subsequent diagnosis of bipolar disorder. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error ex injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4306 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 April 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4307 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 TAL Docket No: 4307-14 6 May 2015 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section L552. A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 April 2015. After careful consideration of your...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4308 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 April 2014. The Board liberally considered whether your PTSD was a causative factor in the misconduct that resulted in your discharge. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4308 14_Redacted
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 April 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. The Board liberally considered whether your PTSD was a causative factor in the misconduct that resulted in your discharge.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4310 14
A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 April 2015. After careful consideration of your application, the Board concluded that your application was not timely filed, and that it would not be in the interest of justice to excuse your failure to submit your application ina timely manner. Specifically, you provided a statement that “while working on your immigration status your attorney discovered that...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4312 14
mee err eS ee VN t = ' wre et were PEEL Immnr i Ac aM BOAR PD FOP & NPPECTION OF NAVAL RPEFCORIS 7G S&S. evidence not previously considered by the Board its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to Gemonstrate the existence Of pavubable material error or injustice, Enclosure Sincerely, ROBERT J. O'NEILL Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4314 14
A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on. 15 April 2015. fter careful consideration: of your application, the Board concluded that your application was not timely filed, and that it would not be in the interest of justice to excuse your failure to submit your application in timely manner. Specifically, you provided no reason for waiving the statute of limitation other than “33 years married,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4317 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 April 2015. fier careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In your case, the Board found aggravating factors.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4318 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Subsequently, you were notified of pending administrative separation by reason of misconduct due...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4320 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 JDR Docket No: 4320-14 8 April 2015 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 April 2015. After careful consideration of your...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4322 14
Your aliegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. In this regard, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden as on the applicant to demonstrate the bable material error oF injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4323 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, Sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 April 2015. Subsequently, administrative discharge action was initiated by reason of misconduct due to wrongful drug use. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4331 14
Because your application was submitted with new evidence not previously considered, the Board found it in the interest of justice to review your most recent application based on the new evidence provided. In this regard, your current request has been carefully examined by a three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, Sitting in executive session on 24 April 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board determined that the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4335 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 April 2015. The Board concluded that you received the benefit of your bargain with the Marine Corps when your request for discharge was granted and you should not be permitted to change it now. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4336 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 April 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the en record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insu to establish the existence of probable material error © injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4339 14
Your current request has been carefully examined by a three- member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session on 17 April 2015. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in your case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4339 14_Redacted
Your current request has been carefully examined by a three- member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session on 17 April 2015. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in your case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4340 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 April 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4341 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 SIN Docket No: 4341-14 2829-13 20 April 2015 This is in reference to your latest reconsideration request received on 25 February 2014. Your current request has also been carefully and conscientiously examined. However, given that it does not contain new evidence that was not previously considered by the Board, your request must again be denied.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4350 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your | application on 15 December 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4363 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 September 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a4 correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4364 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 April 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4367 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 March 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. In your case, the Board determined that a personal appearance was not necessary and considered your case based on the evidence of the record.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4368 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his “RE-4” (not recommended for retention) reentry code be changed per reference (b). The Board, consisting of reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 15 April 2015 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4369 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1004 ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490 BAN Docket No.NR04369-14 16 December 2014 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO Quy Ref: (a) Title 10.U.8.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure {1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4370 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490 BAN | Docket No.NRO4370-14 9 December 2014 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO QE anewagiiaaas, . Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement’ to . ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4376 14
A three- member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 April 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. The Board, in its review of your entire record and application, carefully weighed all potentially mitiaating factors, such as your record of...