NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4506 14
NR4506-14 22 Oct 14 Prom: Choirman, Board for Correccicn of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy who we & beefs’ (a) Title 10 &S.C. 1552 Enel: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2} CNRC Memo 1133 Ser N3 of 7 Oct 14 (3) Subject’s naval record 1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to the Navy College...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4507 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 April 2015. Subsequently, administrative discharge action was initiated by reason of misconduct due to wrongful drug use. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4508 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 April 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4509 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 JDR Docket No: 4509-14 27 April 2015 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 April 2015. Specifically, you provided a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4510 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 April 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. In this regard, an RE-3C reentry code is authorized when a Marine is released from active duty and not recommended for reenlistment.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4511 14
A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 April 2015. After careful consideration of your application, the Board concluded that your application was not timely filed, and that it would not be in the interest of justice to excuse your failure to submit your application in a timely manner. Specifically, you provided a statement that “you were told you could not upgrade your discharge and was not given an...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4513 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 April 2015. Arter careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4517 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 2 May 1986, administrative discharge action was initiated by reason of misconduct due to wrongful drug use. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4518 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 April 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4519 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 April 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4522 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 April 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4525 14
A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 April 2015. After careful consideration of your application, the Board concluded that your application was not timely filed, and that it would not be in the interest of justice to excuse your failure to submit your application ina timely manner. Specifically, you provided a statement that “you have tried for over 40 years” as a reason for waiving the statute of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4526 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 May 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. At that time you were assigned an RE-3G reentry code.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4529 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 JDR Docket No: 4529-14 27 April 26015 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 April 2015. After careful consideration of your...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4530 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 May 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4531 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was entitled to payment of Involuntary Separation Pay (ISP) when he was discharged. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2) y over the subject matter addressed in Petitioner's the effect that the request has merit and CONCLUSION Upon review and consideration of all the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4532 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, an enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his naval record be corrected by removing any and all derogatory material referencing the imposition of nonjudicial punishment (NUP) on 12 August 2011, for being absent from his appointed place of duty on 25 July 2011, and an administrative remarks (Page 11) entry dated 12 August 2021, which references the NUP. The advisory opinions also...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4533 14
Therefore, as of 3 January 2005, you have been enrolled in an immediate RC-SBP annuity for your spouse and child{ren).” See ‘enclosure (7). They notified Petitioner that as of 3 January 2005, he had been enrolled in the RCSBP under the spouse and child category with immediate (Option C) coverage. b. Petitioner is responsible for future unpaid RCSBP costs (Petitioner will be eligible for retire pay on or about 20 April 2021) that would have been deducted if he enrolled at the time of his Marriage.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4534 14
The Board, consisting of reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 24 April 2015, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. The Board concludes that based upon his overall record of service and current Department of the Navy policy as established in yeference (6), that velief in the form of his narrative reason for separation be changed to “secretarial authority,” separation...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4537 14
A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 April 2015. After careful consideration of your application, the Board concluded that your application was not timely filed, and that it would not be in the interest of justice to excuse your failure to submit your application ina timely manner. Specifically, you provided the statement “It’s been 50 years.” as the basis for waiving the statute of limitations.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4540 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 April 2015. Further, the Board concluded that you received the benefit of your bargain with the Marine Corps when your request for discharge was granted and should not be permitted to change it now. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4541 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY DOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 704 &. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner’s Date of Rank be corrected to show a date of 1 October 2013 vice 1 November 2013, now of record. The Board, consisting of Mr. vogt, Mr. Ruskin and Ms. Bianchi reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 7 October 2014 and,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4542 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) . The Board, consisting of Mr. Ruskin, Ms. McCain, and Mr. Exnicios, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on -12 November 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4543 14
Because your application was submitted with new evidence not previously considered, the Board found it in the interest of justice to review your application. Your current request has been carefully examined by a three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session on 24 April 2015. Specifically, the Board concluded that your misconduct was not caused by your PTSD and further determined that, even if there was a nexus between the PTSD and the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4543 14_Redacted
Because your application was submitted with new evidence not previously considered, the Board found it in the interest of justice to review your application. Your current request has been carefully examined by a three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session on 24 April 2015. Specifically, the Board concluded that your misconduct was not caused by your PTSD and further determined that, even if there was a nexus between the PTSD and the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4544 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 April 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. The discharge authority concurred with the ADB and directed separation under honorable conditions by reason of misconduct, and on 12 October 1994,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4545 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 JDR Docket No: 4545-14 12 May 2015 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To? Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his record be corrected to show a characterization of his service rather than a void enlistment, and that all of his rights be...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4547 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 April 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4548 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 April 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error ox injustice. Subsequently, you were notified of pending administrative separation by reason of misconduct due to civilian conviction at which time you waived your...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4551 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 JDR Docket No: 4551-14 27 April 2015 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 April 2015. Specifically, you provided a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4553 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 May 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4554 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 JDR Docket No: 4554-14 27 April 2015 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 April 2015. After careful consideration of your...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4555 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that her “under honorable conditions (general)” characterization of service, narrative reason for separation “discharge involuntarily-homosexuality- admission (administrative discharge board required but waived),” “RE-4” (not recommended for retention) reentry code, and separation program designator (SPD) “HRB1” be changed...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4556 14
A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 April 2015. After careful consideration of your application, the Board concluded that your application was not timely filed, and that it would not be in the interest of justice to excuse your failure to submit your application in a timely manner. Specifically, you provided a statement that “you have always had a job, you pay your bills, take care of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4576 14
— A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, . In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinions furnished by the Deputy Assistant Judge Advocate General (Administrative Law), dated 24 March 2014, Chief of Naval Personnel, dated 14 October 2014, and Commander, Navy Recruiting Command, dated 26 November 2014, copies of which are attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4586 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Subject changed his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) election from spouse to former spouse within one year of his divorce on 6 August 2010. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Ruskin and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 18 June 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4610 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)") entries dated 29 June and 19 July 2011, copies of which are at Tab A. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Boyd, Genteman and Spain, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 17 April 2014, and pursuant to its...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR462 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was authorized Option °*B” in accordance with Overseas Tour Extension Incentives Program {(OTEIP) . The Board, consisting of Mr. Ruskin, Mr. Midboe, and Mr. Exnicios, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 28 October 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4625 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 November 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in Docket NOo.NKU4S62b~-14 this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4626 14
A three- member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 April 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4628 14
RECORDS 701 5. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, ang applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4630 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to retroactive Medical Board Certification Pay (pcp) for the period of 9 March 2012 to 30 September 2012. The Board, consisting of Mr. Vogt, Mr. Ruskin, and Ms. Bianchi reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 7 October 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the partial...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4632 14
Your current request has been carefully examined by a three- member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, .sitting in executive session. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board determined your assertion, that you had trouble with your younger brother, even though not previously considered by the Board, was insufficient to establish the existence of material error or injustice. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4633 14
“ A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 January 2015. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4634 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 EGA Docket No: 4634-14 29 May 2015 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW NAVAL RECORD OF i Se, USN, Ref ; (a) 10 U.S.C. In this regard, on 17 February 2004, he was issued a Certificate of Release of Discharge from Active Duty (DD Form 214) which reflected an honorable characterization of service by reason of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4641 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 April 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4643 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 April 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4650 14
° A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 January 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequentiy, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4655 14
A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 April 2015. After careful consideration of your application, the Board concluded that your application was not timely filed, and that it would not be in the interest of justice to excuse your failure to submit your application in a timely manner. Specifically, you stated “because I did not receive any proper treatment for my addiction to alcohol” as a reason...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4664 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his “general discharge under honorable conditions” be changed to “honorable,” per reference (b). The Board, consisting RR es eee ee reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 28 April 2015 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence...