NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3804 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 May 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with ali material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3809 14
Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in ac regulations and procedures applicable Documentary material considere of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Board. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3810 14
R three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 May 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3821 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 7078. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. - That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected by* changing his name from TO Ce on his Notice of Separation from Service (NAVPERS 553), which was issued on 19 April 1946. b.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3822 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 April 2015. In making this decision, the Board substantially concurred with NDRB’s reasoning when they upgraded your discharge to a General discharge vice Honorable. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3823 14
1552 Fuel: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) Bureau of Medicine and Surgery (BUMED) memo 1000 Ser Mi/14UM10083 of 15 Jul 2014 1, Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show chat Petitioner's received Entry Date Credit for his prior active duty time as a Reservist. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Ruskin and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3824 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, an enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his record be corrected by removing derogatory material regarding a special court-martial (SPCM) - offense of larceny of more than $500. CONCLUSION: Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the Spcm military judge’s order to delete the language referring to the value amount of the government and/or...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3827 14
A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 31 March 2015. not be in the interest of justice to excuse your failure to submit your application in a timely manner. The Board determined this was an insufficient reason to waive the statute since there is no evidence provided that indicates you were unable to file your application within the three years from when you learned of your characterization of service.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3828 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 November 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Docket No.NRO3828-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3830 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on -the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3834 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 March 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. You submitted a written request for an other than honorable (OTH) discharge in order to avoid trial by court-martial for the foregoing period of UA.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3835 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable navat record be corrected by removing the service record page il (“Administrative Remarks (1070)”) entry Gated 6 November 2012 (copy at Tab A). he Board, consisting of Messrs. Hicks, Spooner and Swarens, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 22 August 2014, and pursuant to its regulations, determined...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3836 14
A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 April 2015. After careful consideration of your application, the Board concluded that your application was not timely filed, and that it would not be in the interest of justice to excuse your failure to submit your application ina timely manner. Specifically, you provided a statement that “you lest your discharge statement and recently found it” as a reason for...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3838 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 JDR Docket No: 3838-14 3 April 2015 Dear This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, sectiom 1552. A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 31 March 2015. After careful consideration of -...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3839 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 April 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. information currently contained: in your record, the Board concluded’ these factors were-not sufficient to warrant an upgrade of your discharge given...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3840 14
A _ three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on * 5 . Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3842 14
After careful consideration of your application, the Board concluded that your application was not timely filed, and that it would not be in the interest of justice to excuse your failure to submit your application ina timely manner. Specifically, you provided the statement “for the sake of truth” as a reason for waiving the statute of limitations. Sincerely, ROBERT J. O’NEILL Executive Director DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3843 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was IinsuLtieient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying fora correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3844 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 requires that a waiver be obtained from recruiting personnel who are responsible for reviewing the feasibility of satisfying the Marine Corps personnel manning goals by determining whether or not an individual meets the standards for reenlistment. If you wish to reenlist, re-affiliate, or be reinstated in the Marine Corps, you should contact the Marine Corps Recruiting...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3845 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 April 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3849 14
a three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 April 2015. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in your case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3850 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Further, the Board concluded that you received the benefit of your bargain with the Marine Corps when your request for discharge was granted and should not be permitted to change it now. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3854 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “B"” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) . The Board, consisting of Mr. Bey, Mr. Genteman, and Ms. Polk, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 8 October 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3855 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 May 2015. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in your case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3857 14
A three-member panel of the Boar@ for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 November 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3859 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive: session, considered your application on 5 November 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3861 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 November 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3865 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 JDR Docket No: 3865-14 10 April 2015 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy ~° © 0°) ' Subj: REVIEW NAVAL RECORD OF Qi ey USN, XXX-XX Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6{e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3866 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 JDR Docket No: 3866-14 8 April 2015 Dear i: This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 April 2015. After careful consideration...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3867 14
A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 31 March 2015. After careful consideration of your application, the Board concluded that your application was not timely filed, and that it would not be in the interest of justice to excuse your failure to submit your application ina timely manner. Specifically, you provided a statement that “you were never able to see the reports made by the investigator” and as...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3868 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 JDR Docket No: 3868-14 8 April 2015 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 April 2015. After careful consideration of your...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3872 14
BR three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 November 2014, Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3874 14
A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 April 2015. After careful consideration of your application, the Board concluded that your application was not timely filed, and that it would not be in the interest of justice to excuse your failure to submit your application ina timely manner. Specifically, you provided a statement “your discharge was never upgraded” as a reason for waiving the statute of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3875 14
after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Nevertheless, the Board found that these factors were not sufficient to warrant a change to the reason for your discharge given the medical conditions that existed prior to your entry. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3893 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to 5 advanced to B-5/MM2 from the March 2013 Navy-wide advancement | evele. Navy Personnel Command is directed to issue Petitioner a DD Form 215 to correct his effective date of rank and pay. 7, Bi Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for correction of Naval Records...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3895 14
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by HOMC memo 7220 MPO of 22 Sep 14, a copy of which is attached. Accordingly, your application has been denied. NR3895-14 for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3896 14
A three-member panel of the Board for correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 January 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with ali material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable gtatutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3898 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490 BAN Docket No.NR03898-14 30 October 2014 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Sa) + AN Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference {a} Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable navai record be corrected to show that he declined Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) spousal...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3900 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a} Subject, hereinafter referred to 4s Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, 1n effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner declined enrollment with spousal concurrence in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). The Board, consisting of Mr. Ruskin, Mr. Midboe, and Mr. Exnicios, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 98 October 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3901 14_Redacted
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 April 2015. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in your case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3903 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 April 2014. In regard to your request for separation pay, the Board noted that this action was completed on 7 August 2013, and as such, no further consideration is warranted. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3904 14
1552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) CNRC Memo 1133 Ser N323 of 1’ dul 14 (3) Supject's naval record 1, Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to add the Loan Repayment Program (LRP) to she anlistment guarantees. CONCLUSTON Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3907 14
NR3907-14 4 Bug 14 From: Chairman, Roard for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ico Ref: (a) Title 10 u.s.C. CONCLUSTON finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective action. hereinarter referred to 4s Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to an Fnlistment Bonus for Ruskin, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3908 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was entitled to payment of Involuntary Separation Pay (ISP) when he was discharged. b. Petitioner was authorized payment of “EvLl1" Involuntary Separation Pay (ISP) when he was discharged on 14 January 2014. c. Note: the separation pay described above will be offset by any...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3910 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to provide reimbursement for a Household Goods (HHG) move. The Board, consisting of Mr. Bey, Mr. Genteman, and Ms. Polk, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 8 October 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that t corrective action indicated below should be taken...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3911 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 April 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3914 14
A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 31 March 2015. After careful consideration of your application, the Board concluded that your application was not timely filed, and that it would not be in the interest of justice to excuse your failure to submit your application in a timely manner. Specifically, you provided a statement that “you were told your discharge automatically becomes Honorable when your...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3916 14
A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 April 2015. After careful consideration of your application, the Board concluded that your application was not timely filed, and that it would not be in the interest of justice to excuse your failure to submit your application ina timely manner. Specifically, you provided a statement that “you loved your time on active duty in the Marine Corps” that...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3927 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S$. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the concurrent fitness report for 18 June 2011 to 1 August 2012 (copy at Tab A), leaving in the record the concurrent report for 18 June 2011 to 19 July 2012 (copy at Tab B). The Board, consisting of Messrs. Gattis,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3928 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 JDR Docket No: 3928-14 8 April 2015 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 April 2015. After careful consideration of your...