NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3929 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 April 2015. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3933 14
“tn addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion Furnished by CNRFC ltr 5420 Ser wi/osss5 of 25 Aug 14, a copy of which is attached, After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. The Board found that NAVADMIN 203/09 published in June 2009 provided the procedures members are required to follow to transfer the Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3936 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNPC memo 1780 PERS-312 of 12 Sep 14, a copy of which is attached. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR394 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 4001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 Doc Docket No, NR394-14 27 Jun 14 : From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3941 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on = -: 18 March 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 29 October 2010, you were so discharged and assigned an RE-3P reentry code.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3942 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject’s mother, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he Geclined enrollment in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). CONCLUSION Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in Light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective action. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3944 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1601 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 JDR Docket No: 3944-14 3 April 2015 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. : | A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 31 March 2015. After careful consideration...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3945 14
aA three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, Sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 April 2015. Additionally, the Board noted that you did not appeal the NUP and concluded that its removal from your record was unwarranted. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3946 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 April 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. As a. result of this action, you submitted a written request for an other than honorable discharge in order to avoid trial by court-martial for the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3947 14
A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your | application on 25 March 2015. After careful consideration of your: application, the Board concluded that. your application was not timely filed, and that it would not be in.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3949 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “BY Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) . The Board, consisting of Mr. Ruskin, Ms. McCain, and Mr. Exnicios, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on , 12 November 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3950 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 March 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3951 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. in addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by OCNO memo 7431 Ser N130C/14U1257 dated 25 September 2014, a COPY of which was sent to you on 10 October 2014; it was returned to sender on 28 October 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3954 14
A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your ‘application on 26 March 2015. that your application was not timely filed, and that it would not be in the interest of justice to excuse your failure to submit your application in a timely manner. Specifically, you stated “I didn’t consider my character of discharge to be important at the time” as a reason for waiving the statute of limitations.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3955 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 March 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Your record further reflects that on 8 October 2013, the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) changed the characterization of your service to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3974 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 January 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your deceased father’s naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. NR3974-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3976 14
However, in light your highly decorated award (Silver Star), your case was presented to the Board out of respect for your exceptional service to our country. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 November 2014, Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Accordingly, your application...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3978 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 December 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. NR3978-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3980 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. in addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by HOMC memo 5420 MMEA dated 21 August 2014, a copy of which is attached. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3981 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 EGA Docket No: 3981-14 7 April 2015 veo This is in reference to your Application for Correction of Military Record, DD Form 149, dated 18 February 2014, in which you requested your record be corrected to show that you received an RE-8 reenlistment code. Following a preliminary review of your records, it was noted that on October 9, 2012, you received an uncharacterized...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3982 14
in addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNPC memo 1780 PERS-314 of 20 Aug 14, a copy of which is attached. This is an important feature of the law because the transferability Docket No. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3983 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S, COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 EGA Docket No: 3983-14 28 April 2015 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 April 2015. After careful consideration of your...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3984 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 April 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3986 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 April 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3988 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, Sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 March 2015. It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in your case.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3989 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 EGA Docket No: 3989-14 28 April 2015 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 April 2015. After careful consideration of your...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3990 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 February 2015. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board ‘prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3991 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 April 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3992 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 April 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. The Board, in its review of your entire record and application, carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as your desire to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3993 14
A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 April 2015. After careful consideration of your application, the Board concluded that your application was not timely filed, and that it would not be in the interest of justice to excuse your failure to submit your application ina timely manner. Specifically, you attached a statement highlighting your maturity and desire to pursue a criminal justice career as a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3994 14
A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 April 2015. After careful consideration of your application, the Board concluded that your application was not timely filed, and that it would not be in the interest of justice to excuse your failure to submit your application ina timely manner. Specifically, you stated “I was told in 1979 my records were destroyed in a fire but finally received copies in 2009”...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3998 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 EGA Docket No: 3998-14 28 April 2015 «ea This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 April 2015. After careful consideration...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4002 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 December 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4004 14
A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 March 2015. After careful consideration of your application, the Board concluded that your application was not timely filed, and that it would not be in the interest of ‘justice to excuse your failure to submit your application ina timely manner. Specifically, you provided no reason for waiving the statute of limitations.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4006 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your ape ene on 17 March 2015. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board Documentary material considered by the Boaz consisted of ur application, together with all material submitted in support Chee, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies....
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4008 14
CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 30% &. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was entitled to payment of Involuntary Separation Pay (ISP) when she was discharged. esent_at the Board's review and 4. it is certified that quorum was pr ue and complete recora of deliberations, and that the foregoing i the Board's...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4009 14
A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 April 2015. After careful consideration of your application, the Board concluded that your application was not timely filed, and that it would not be in the interest of justice to excuse your failure to submit your application ina timely manner. Specifically, you provided a statement that “it will help you get better car insurance through USAA” as a reason for...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4010 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 EGA Docket No: 4010-14 28 April 2015 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 April 2015. After careful consideration of your...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4014 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 31 March 2015. after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4017 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 BIG Docket No: 4017-14 14 August 2014 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Bey, Clemmons, and Zsalman, reviewed allegations of error and injustice on 12 August 2014, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4018 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4019 14
A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 April 2015. After careful consideration of your application, the Board concluded that your application was not timely filed, and that it would not be in the interest of justice to excuse your failure to submit your application ina timely manner. Specifically, you stated “that I may be granted benefits through the VA” as a reason for waiving the statute of limitations.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4022 14
OA three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 October 2014. Additionally, the Board considered your response to the advisory opinion dated 1 October 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4023 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 §. Pursuant to the provisions of reference {a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, Filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to remove a correction to the DD Form 214. The Board, consisting of Mr. Ruskin, Mr. Midboe, and Mr. Exniclos, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 28 October 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4025 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 April 2015. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant relief in your case, given the seriousness of your misconduct and you were not recommended for reenlistment. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4026 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 April 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Subsequently, administrative discharge action was initiated by reason of misconduct due to wrongful drug use.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4027 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 EGA Docket No: 4027-14 28 April 2015 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 April 2015. After careful consideration of your...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4028 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 BIC Docket No. CONCLUSION Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective action. NR4028-14 RECOMMENDATION: That Petitioner's naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show that: a.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4029 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 April 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4031 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 7601S. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, an active duty enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that the Record of Unauthorized Absénce (NAVPERS 1070/606) form, dated 4 April 2011, covering the period from 29 to 31 March 2011, be removed from her Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) . Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures,...