NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3594 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on >@ October 2014. Vou submitted a written i request [or an other than honorable (OTH) discharge in order to avoid trial py court-martial for two additional periods of UA totaling over 40 days and.two instances of missing ship’s movement. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant te demonstrate the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3597 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. The discharge authority approved this recommendation and directed separation under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct, and on 2 March 1993, you were so discharged. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3598 14
Although your application was not filed in a timely manner, the Board found it in the interest of justice to waive the statute of limitations and consider your application on its merits. A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 31 March 2015. Specifically, you provided no reason for waiving the statute of limitation other than “no reason was given for.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3599 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 April 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3600 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he declined Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage with spousal concurrence before his retirement. The Board, consisting of Messrs. zsalman, Ruskin and Exnicios reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 21 July 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3601 14
On 14 January 2008 the Assistant Secretary of the Navy for Manpower and Reserve Affairs approved-the recommendation of the Acting Director, Personnel Management Division, Headquarters, U.S. Marine Corps, that you be discharged by reason of the best interest of the service due to a pattern of misconduct, with a general discharge. New material evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3603 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his honorable characterization of service be reflected on his Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States (DD Form 214). Although Petitioner was properly discharged from active duty with a characterization of honorable, his DD Form 214 does not reflect he received an honorable discharge. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3608 14
NR3608-14 9 Oct 14 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552), A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 October 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. You were...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3609 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 31 March 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board Found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error oF injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3611 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, Sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 May 2015. At that time, you were assigned an RE-3C reentry code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3612 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 31 March 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3614 14
¥ Jil le wh iL ceeltity , i3 : . New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in your case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3621 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 March 2015. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in acc with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. The Board, in its review of your entire record and application, carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as your desire to upgrade your character of service and contention that you...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3622 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be correc to show the Petitioner reenlisted and eligible for advancement un the provisions of the Selective Training and Reenlistment (STAR) program. 2, The Board, consisting of Mr. Bey, Mr. Genteman, and Ms. Polk, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 8 October 2014 and, pursuant to its...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3626 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memo 1430 Ser 811/069 dtd 28 Feb 14, a copy of which is attached. applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3635 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 March 2015. Specifically, you provided no reason for waiving the statute of limitations.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3640 14
The Board, in its review of your entire record and application, carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as your record of service and desire to have your SCM removed from your official records. The policy specifically covers veterans who received OTH discharges. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3644 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 7O1 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE foot ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 SIN Docket No: 3644-14 10 July 2014 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW NAVAL RECORD OF ‘Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. His commanding officer forwarded his case and the separation authority directed an OTH discharge. The Board concludes that based upon his overall record of service and current Department of the Navy policy as...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3669 14
Public Law 109-364 enacted on 17 permitted the surviving spouses of service members who duty after 7 October 2001 but before 24 November 2003 their SBP election be changed from spouse coverage tc spouse exc! The annuity was payable only for the mont bs beginning on October 2006, the date Public Law was enacted. On 1 Nov BP coverage was changed from spouse to ch 4 It as cert quorum was deliberations, and that the foregoing i or anc D1 record of the Board's proceedings in the above en i 5...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3691 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3695 14
The Board, consisting of Messrs. zsalman, George and Ruskin reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 4 August 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that “the partial corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Docket Ne: NPRO3695-14 CONCLUSION Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3705 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted cf your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. ble material error or injustice. year from the date of the Board's decision.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3722 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to remove the Loan Repayment Program (LRP) from her enlistment guarantees. The Board, consisting of Mr. zgaiman, Mr. George and Ruskin, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 4 August 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3724 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 EGA Docket No: 3724-14 20 March 2015 Dear QE This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. A three member panel -of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 March 2015. However, your request must...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3732 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 §. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 JDR Docket No: 3732-14 8 April 2015 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 April 2015.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3735 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, ‘sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 March 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, “regulations, and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3738 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 &. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (i) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to add the Loan Repayment Program (LRP) to his enlistment guarantees. c. A copy of this Report of Proceedings will be filed in Petitioner’s naval record.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3739 14
AR three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 September 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3743 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 7O1 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 100T ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 SJN Docket No: 3743-14 10 July 2014 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Ref: (a) 10 U.S.c. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting a change of his uncharacterized entry level separation issued on 29 August 1389. , 2. The Board,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3747 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)") entry dated 10 May 2011 (copy at Tab A}. The Board, consisting of Ms. Trucco and Messrs. Chapman and Exnicios, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 16 October 2014, and pursuant to its...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3750 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD 1001 ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490 JET Docket No. 1552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/fattachments (2) HOMC memo 7220 MPO of 20 Feb 15 (3) Subject’s naval record 1... Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to transfer Post-9/11 GI Bill...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3752 14
A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 31 March 2015. After careful consideration of your application, the Board concluded that your application was not. timely filed, and that it would not be in the interest of justice to excuse your failure to submit your application ina timely manner.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3753 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3755 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that she was selected to LT/0-3 from the All Fully Qualified List with an effective date of 9 February 2014. The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Ruskin and Exnicios reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 10 September 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3756 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 100% ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 No. NR3756-1 Param - Chairmar Rnara Far Correrctrian of Naval Records m™ . Cporreraryv oTr tne sary Los Secretary or the NaVY cry LLCO Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD esting, requ to adjust stitioner's allegations of error and I ‘ 7 geass oiegar me SEAS 2 .
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3764 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 November 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this cage. Docket No.NHRO3764-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an optical naval record, the burden ig on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3771 14
NR3771-14 22 Dec 14 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner did not have a break in service or changed his Place Entered Active Duty (PLEAD) from 2. The Board, consisting...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3772 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 704 $. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a} Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he declined Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage at retirement in March 2002, due to having no eligible dependents. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Ruskin and George reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 12 May 2014 and,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3773 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 November 2014. after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. when applysny for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3775 14
Your current request has been carefully examined by a three- member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session on 17 December 2014. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board determined your letter explaining the events concerning your civil arrest even though not previously considered by the Board, was insufficient to establish the existence of material error or injustice. New evidence is evidence not previously...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3778 14
enclosure (2), the office having in Petitioner's application it and warrants b. and consideration © in light of the cont ce warranting Upon review especially existence of an injusti RECOMMENDATION : That Petitioner's naval record be corrected, where appropriate, as follows: t and Els hig Reserve Oath of office on 21 June petitioner accept @ HD wc CG C 0 @m K Cc b Kw ed 2009 vic f Rank to LT/O-3 is corrected to show an b. Petitioner’s Date o 09 vice 19 June 2012. effective date of 21 June...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3780 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting: that his RE-4 {not recommended for reenlistment) reentry code be changed. The Board, consisting of Mr. Grover, Mr. Rothleim, and Mr. Clemmons, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and ‘injustice on 10 December 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the partial corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3781 14
an DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY ae. NR3781-14 21 Nov 14 prom: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records TO: secretary of the Navy Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “BY” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) .
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3782 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 September 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support therecf and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3789 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, gitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 August 2014. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative reguiations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicabie statutes, regulations and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3792 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by HQMC memo 7220 MPO of 12 Aug 14, a copy of which is attached. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3793 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on °- 25 March 2015. Subsequently, you were notified of pending administrative separation by reason of misconduct at which time you waived your procedural rights to consult with legal counsel and to present your case to an administrative discharge board (ADB). Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3796 14
A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 April 2015. After careful consideration of your application, the Board concluded that your application was not timely filed, and that it would not be in the interest of justice to excuse your failure to submit your application ina timely manner. Specifically, you stated “upon leaving the military, my focus was on raising a family, finding a job to support them”...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3800 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 January 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3801 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 July 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...