NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3396 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In making this determination, the Board concurred with the comments your application has contained in the advisory opinion. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3397 14
BR three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 November 2014. Documentary material consid the Board consisted of your application, toge a material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies In addition, the Board considered the attached advisor} opinion furnished by Headguarters Marine Corps, a COPY of which is attached for your intormation. You are...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3401 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3410 14_Redacted
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 November 2014 . Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your n aval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies . Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the app licant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3411 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your deceased former husband's naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Decket No, NR3411-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3418 14
COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1007 oe, ae ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 JET Docket No. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board ‘prior to making its decision in this case.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3420 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 December 2014. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3429 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 January 2015. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. NR3429-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3447 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was entitled to payment of Involuntary Separation Pay (ISP) when he was discharged. Note: full payment of non-disability separation pay is authorized to the member who has entered into a written agreement with the Navy to serve in the Ready Reserve for a period of not less than...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR345 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 December 2014. The Board noted that you waived the right to an ADB, your best chance for retention or a better characterization of service, and that you were fortunate to have your characterization of service upgraded to general by NDRB, since it was directed that you received an OTH discharge for misconduct. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3450 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by HOMC memo 5420 MMEA dated 4 August 2014, a copy of which is attached. NR3450-14 ay 4 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to iemanieaee the existence...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3452 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with ail material submitted in support thereof, your naval record: and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. However, after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making 4ts...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3452 14_Redacted
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, Sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 March 2015. The discharge authority approved this recommendation and directed separation under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct, on 17 October 1986, you were so discharged The Board, in its review of your entire record and application, carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as your desire to upgrade your discharge and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3453 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 December 2014. material error or injustice. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board Docket No.NRO03453-14 prior to making its decision in this case, In.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3454 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner had declined participation in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP), with spousal concurrence, prior to his transfer to the Temporery Disability Retired List (TDRL). The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Ruskin and George reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 18 August 2014 and, pursuant...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3456 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 July 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3457 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 March 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the ent record, the Board found the evidence submitted was i £ to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Subsequently, your request for discharge was granted and on 3 January 1990, you received an OTH discharge in lieu of trial by court-martial.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3458 14
The discharge authority approved this recommendation and directed separation under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct, on 17 October 1986, you were so discharged The Board, in its review of your entire record and application, carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as your desire to upgrade your discharge and assertion of suffering with a traumatic brain injury (TBI) which existed prior to service. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3458 14_Redacted
a three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, Sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 March 2015. Documentary materia considered by the Board ¢ your application, together with all material submitted in support a : = thereof, your naval Tecora, anda applicable statutes, regulations, and policies After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3460 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 November 2014. Therefore, your case was provided to the Board as is for a final determination. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable materiai error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3461 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 March 2015. Subsequently, administrative discharge action was initiated by reason of misconduct due to wrongful drug use, You waived your rights to consult counsel, submit a statement, or have your case heard by an administrative discharge board (ADB). Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3462 14
A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 March 2015. After careful consideration of your application, the Board concluded that your application was not timely filed, and that it would not be in the interest of justice to excuse your failure to submit your application in a timely manner. Further, the evidence must.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3463 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 November 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3464 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 September 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3465 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 31 March 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3471 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR COR! TION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 Docket ! NR32471-14 24 Maz E This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552 A three-member panel of g in executive ses c 5 Your all rdance with admini oO e Yy considere ri y Lon 1 shed by OCNO memo N130C2/15U1 i ( ry 2015 copy of which iis ee Arter ana conscientious considerati Che ¢€ re recora C...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3479 14
Nevertheless, the Board found that these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given the seriousness of your misconduct that resulted in five NJPs and an SCM. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in your case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3481 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 March 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3482 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the lineal position, date of rank, and effective date in the grade of major he would have been assigned had he been selected for promotion to that grade by the Fiscal Year (FY) 2013 Major Selection Board, vice the FY 2014 Major Selection Board. CONCLUSION: Upon review and consideration of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3484 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 EGA Docket No: 3484-14 20 March 2015 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the . United States Code,. section 1552.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3486 14
A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your ; application on 20 March 2015. After careful consideration of your application, the Board concluded that your application was not timely filed, and that it would not be in the interest of justice to excuse your failure to submit your application in a timely manner. Specifically, you stated “I did not rape the woman and have lived a much better life since my youth” as a reason...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3488 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 March 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insuffi to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3491 14
DEPART) OFT 5 He WAVY BOABD EAR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS “an & COURTS WISk ROALI SOE TOU" ARLINGTON, VA 22204-24 90 Due Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to cancel an immediate reenlistment contract. CONCLUSION Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3492 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 190% ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 r airman, Board for Correction of Naval Records TO: Secretary of the Navy in cS 5 Ud. 9 ty < WH tl = O ny 2 ba = wa i QO Oo ud o Hi OQ Oo Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments 2) CNP memo 5420 Ser 130C1/15U00311 dtd 10 mar (3) Subject's naval record he of reference (a) ed enclosure (1) e applicable naval Temporary Lodging . Pursuant to the provision referred to as...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3493 14
After careful and conscientious consi eration of the the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient establish the existence of probable material error or inj i this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. NR3493-14 Consequentiy, when applying for a correction of an otiicial naval record, the burden is on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3499 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the enlisted performance evaluation report for 16 September 2011 to 25 June 2012 (copy at Tab A). e. That any material directed to be removed from Petitioner's naval record be returned to the Board, together with a copy of this Report of Proceedings, for retention in a confidential...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3503 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3506 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 JDR Docket No: 3506-14 8 May 2015 naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 May 2015. After careful consideration of your application, the Board concluded that your application was not Justice...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3514 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that Subject’s naval record be corrected to show that he had “spousal” SBP category of coverage for his spouse, @ a ied. CONCLUSION Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following partial corrective action. In October 1984, Subject...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3516 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 31 March 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate i i error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3520 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 June 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3529 14
A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 May 2015. After careful consideration of your application, the Board concluded that your application was not timely filed, and that it would not be in the interest of justice to excuse your failure to submit your application ina timely manner. Specifically, you provided a statement that “you were diagnosed as having adult ADHD on 15 March 2012” as a reason for...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3533 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490 BAN Docket No.NRO3533-14 8 May 2014 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: A a Ref: (a} Title 10 U.S.C. The Board determined the following factors militated in favor of relief: That Petitioner did pass the PFA before the limiting date, as required, that the CO endorsed Petitioner's selection for advancement by “frocking” him...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3535 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-6/AWF1 from the March 2013 Navy-wide advancement examination due to two missing award points. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Exnicios and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 7 April 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3576 14
NR3576-14 11 Sep 14 From Chairman, Board For Correction of Maval Pecords TO: Secretary of the Navy Subj Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to modify an immediate reenlistment contract. The Board, consisting of Mr. Ruskin, Mr. Exnicios, and Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3580 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your reconsideration request on 14 April 2014. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by Docket No.NRO03580-14 the Board. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3583 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was entitled to payment of Involuntary Separation Pay (ISP) when he was discharged. The Board, consisting of Mr. Bey, Mr. Genteman, and Ms. Polk, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 8 October 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3588 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to cancel an immediate reenlistment contract, and then issue, an agreement to extend enlistment. The Board, consisting of Mr. Ruskin, Ms. McCain, and Mr. Exnicios, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 12 November 2014 and, pursuant To its regulations, determined that...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3590 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3591 14
LSS2 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) NPC memo 1160 Ser 913/163 dtd 31 Jul 14 (3) Subject's naval record le Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the Petitioner reenlisted and eligible for advancement under the provisions of the Selective Training and Reenlistment (STAR) program. CONCLUSION Upon review and consideration...