NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3241 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 May 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3245 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 May 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3251 14
Therefore, when Petitioner started to receive his retired pay, he noticed a payment being made for SBP “spousal” coverage for $262.08, enclosure (4). On 23 December 2013, DFAS notified Petitioner stating that “(DFAS does] not have the authority te change the invalid election without authorization from the Board for Correction of the Navy", enclosure (5).° e. On 2 January 2014, Petitioner submitted a request to the BCNR, as directed by DFAS. As part of the package, Petitioner submitted a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3266 14
RBERARNS BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD 7545 POUPTHOUSE ROAD. The Board, consisting of Mr. Hedrick, 30 September 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, and Ms. reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on determined that with this Board that the applicable naval record be corrected Wilcher, the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. enclosure (2), the effect that the request has merit and all the evidence of record,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3268 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on @ January 2015. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3270 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 November 2014. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient +o establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. for a correction of an official naval Consequently, when applying to demonstrate the existence of record, the burden is on the applicant probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3273 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY n BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 §. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to provide reimbursement for 4 Household Goods (HHG) move. The Board, consisting of Mr. Ruskin, Mr. Exnicios, and Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 15 September 2014 and, pursuant (6) Lies...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3276 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 October 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. NR3276-14 rrection of an official naval Consequentiy, when applying for a co demonstrate the existence De record, the burden is on the applicant to probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3277 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 September 2014. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by HOMC memo 1336 RCT dated 16 July 2014, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3278 14
BR three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 October 2014. On 12 November 2013 you were so @ischarged and assigned an RE-37 reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3279 14
Soe, DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY RES 2 cae i BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S, COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490 BAN Docket No.NPR03279-14 17 December 2014 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: [REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD 1CO
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3281 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 November 2014. Thus, your request for a personal appearance has been denied. presumption of Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3283 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to modify an enlistment/reenlistment document. The Board, consisting of Mr. Ruskin, Mr. Exnicios, and Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 22 September 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3292 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3295 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Your request was granted and the commanding officer directed your OTH discharge.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3297 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was entitled to payment of Involuntary Separation Pay (ISP) when he was discharged. The Board, consisting of Mr. Hedrick, Mr. Ruskin, and Ms. Wilcher, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 30 September 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3304 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 November 2014. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3306 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, an enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that her naval record be corrected by removing any and all derogatory material referencing the imposition of nonjudicial punishment (NUP) on 4 April 2012 for failure to obey a lawful order and an administrative remarks (Page 11) entry regarding her norirecommendation for promotion due to the NIP, also dated 4 April 2012. The Board, consisting of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3307 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that she declined Survivor Benefit Plan coverage with spousal concurrence, prior to her retirement. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Ruskin and George, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 9 June 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3309 14
NR3309-14 11 Sep 14 Brom Cheirman, Board for Corvection of Naval Pecords To: Secretary of the Navy Sub}: se | Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to modify an immediate reenlistment contract. The Board, consisting of Mr. Ruskin, Mr. Exnicios, and Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3310 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval recor be corrected to show timely election of the REDUX Retired Pay Plan with a lump sum payment of the Career Status Bonus (CSB? The Board, consisting of Mr. Ruskin, Mr. George, and Mr. Exnicios, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error ana injustice on 2 September 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3314 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 100i ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 SIN = Docket No: 3314-14 18 September 2014 *, From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy Reserve, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his discharge of 8 November 2013, _be...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR332 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 71001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 Dac Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “B” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB). This change will entitle the member to a zone “B” SRB for MOS 2336, which ig capped...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3321 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 December 2014. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC (memo. NR3321-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3326 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “B" Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) . CONCLUSION Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective action. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3329 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your reconsideration request on 28 April 2014. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by Docket No.NRO03329-14 the Board. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3337 14
COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1004 ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490 BAN Docket No.NRO3337-14 10 October 2014 This is in reference to your application for correction to your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 United States Code, section L552 A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 October 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3339 14
BoP ensciiein Oy DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY ee P Bre \S BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS te ee. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to modify an enlistment/reenlistment document . This change, upon completion of MOS training, will entitle the Petitioner to a zone "A" SRB for MOS 0211, which is capped at $41,500 for 48 months of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3342 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 November 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3342 14_Redacted
The Board, in its review of your entire record and application carefully weighed a+l potentially mitigating factors, such as your desire to upgr~de your discharge and assertion of post(cid:173) traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) . New evidence is evidence not previously considered by In this the Board prior to making its decision in your case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3343 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was entitled to payment of Involuntary Separation Pay (ISP) when he was discharged. CONCLUSION Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3344 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, Filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to issue a Correction to DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty (DD Form 215). The Board, consisting of Mr. Ruskin, Ms. McCain, and Mr. Exnicios, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 12 November 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3348 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 November 2014. your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and revcedures applicable to the proceedings oF 8» Board. New evidence is evidence the Board prior to making its decision ep in mind that you are entitl reconsider its year from the date of the Bo not previously considered by in this case. rrection...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3349 14_Redacted
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 JDR Docket No: 3349-14 10 April 2015 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Ret: (a) 16 U.S.C. 2 The Board, consisting of i S...; Po reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 8 April 2015, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3354 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 April 2015. In this regard, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3355 14
The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice, finds as follows: a. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by removing the following enlisted performance evaluation report and related material: Period of Report Date of Report Reporting Senior From To 14 Nov 12 16 Nov 11 15 Nov 12 b. e. That any material directed to be removed from Petitioner's naval record be returned to the Board, together with a copy of this Report...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3356 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 HCG Docket No. NR3356-14 23 Oct 14 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy bj Ref: (a) Titie 10 U.S.c. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval yecord be corrected to show entitlement to Overseas...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3357 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that nis narrative reason for separation “homosexuality - stated he or she is a homosexual or bisexual”, be changed to wSecretarial Authority” per reference. The Board concludes that based upon his record of service and current Department of the Navy policy as established in reference (b}, that relief in the form of his narrative reason...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR336 14
after careful and conscientious consideration of che entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant relief in your case because of your failure to satisfactorily participate in the Marine Corps Reserve and nonrecommendation for retention or reenlistment. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3366 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 November 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. The Board concluded that you received the benefit of your bargain with the Navy when your request for discharge was granted and should not be...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3368 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, nereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to add the Loan Repayment Program (LRP) to his enlistment guarantees. 2, The Board, consisting of Mr. Zealman, Mr. George, and Mr. Ruskin, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 4 August 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3369 14
Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regquiations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Under the rules governing this Board, af application for a correction of a naval record must be made within three years after the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3373 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) . The Board, consisting of Mr. Ruskin, Mr. Exnicios, and Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 22 September 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3376 14
1552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) Navy Personnel Command (NPC) memo 1430 Ser 811/085 of 13 Mar 2014 1, Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-4/AT3 from the March 2013 Navy-wide advancement examination. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Exnicios and George reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3378 14
R three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 December 2014 and requested that an additional advisory opinion be obtained from the Navy Personnel Command (NPC). The Board also considered your letter dated 12 September 2014 with enclosures and your e-mail dated 10 December 2014. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3381 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner enrolled in spouse coverage under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). 32, The Board, consisting of Mr. Hedrick, Mr. Ruskin, and Ms. Wilcher, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 30 September 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3382 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “AY Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB). The Board, consisting of Mr. Ruskin, Ms. McCain, and Mr. Exnicios, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 12 November 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3386 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 7014 §. Pursuant to t 2, The Board, consisting of Mr. yeealman, Mr. George, and Mr. Ruskin, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 14 July 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. ‘The Board, having reviewed finds as follows: Petitioner’ s allegations of error and injustice, is Board, Petitioner exhausted all a.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3391 14
COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490 BAN Docket No:NRO3391-14 22 July 2014 for correction of your This is in reference to your application of 10 USC 1552. naval record pursuant to the provisions a” three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your 2014. Under the rules governing this Board, an application for a correction of a naval record must be made within three years after the discovery of the alleged error. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3392 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure {i) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page il (“Administrative Remarks (1070)"} entries dated 16 February and 7 October 2012 (copies at Tabs A and B, respectively) . The Board, consisting of Messrs. Chapman, Koman and Spain, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 8 January 2015, and...