NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3048 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner’s received active duty service credit from 22 June 1982 until 28 Maren 1986. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Ruskin, Exnicios and Midboe reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 28 October 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3051 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 November 2014. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in your case.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3054 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 October 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3065 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 October 2014. The discharge authority approved this recommendation and directed separation under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct, and on 8 November 1993, you were so dischargea ‘The Board, in its review of your entire record and application, ‘carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as your desire to upgrade your...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3065 15_Redacted
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 October 2014. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. The discharge authority approved this recommendation and directed separation under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct, and on 8 November...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR307 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 August 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. However, the screen shot of the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) application you printed prior to submitting your application clearly shows two...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3075 14
DEPARTMENT OF ThE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 §. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner had no eligible spouse beneficiary for participation in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) prior to his date of retirement. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Ruskin and Exnicios reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR309 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 December 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR312 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error OF injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3128 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Subsequently, you were notified of pending administrative separation by reason of alcohol rehabilitation failure, at which time you waived your procedural rights to consult with legal counsel and to present your case to an administrative discharge board. Nevertheless, the Board found that...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3128 14_Redacted
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 October 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Subsequently, you were notified of pending administrative ‘separation by reason of alcohol rehabilitation failure, at which time you waived your...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR313 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, Suite 4001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204 JET Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show timely election of the REDUX Retired Pay Plan with a lump sum payment of the Career Status Bonus {CSB) . The Board, consisting of Mr. Zsalman, Mr. George, and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3138 14
This is an important feature of the law because the transferability Docket No. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board tprior to making#its decision in this case. Consequently, when -appiying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3139 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to established entitlement to payment of lump sum leave (LSL). naval record. NR3139-14 f authority set out in Section 6(e) Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e)) and having assured compliance with its provisions, it 4s hereby announced that...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3145 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-6/MN1 from the February 2012 Navy-wide Reserve advancement examination. 2, The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Exnicios and Ruskin reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 21 July 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the partial corrective action...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3147 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 §. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (8) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record pe corrected to show timely election of the REDUX Retired Pay Plan with a lump sum payment of the Career Status Bonus (CSB). CONCLUSION Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in Light of the contents of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3150 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 BUG Docket No: 3150-14 3 June 2014 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Finally, in light of the fact that he was administratively separated due to his SPCM conviction, he should be given credit with pay for the time he needs to retire in light of the 20 year service limitation for...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3153 14
The Board, consisting of Mr. Chapman, Ms. White-Olson, and Mr. Creen reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 22 October 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Therefore, on 27 May 1977, he was separated with a general discharge. for administratively separating enlisted service members due to homosexuality.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3154 14
NR3154-14 18 July 2014 Prom: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the date of rank and effective date of his promotion to lieutenant, Chaplain Corps, U. S. Navy as 1 December 2012, rathec than 1 December...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3158 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 November 2014. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3162 14_Redacted
Your current request has been carefully examined by a three- member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, any material submitted in support of your application, and prior case file. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board determined the psychological evaluation notes you submitted, even though not previously considered by the Board,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3170 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 7O1S. Pursuant to the provisions of reference {a}, Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his narrative reason |- fox separation “Homosexual Conduct”, be changed to “Secretarial Authority” per reference (bo). His commanding officer forwarded his case and the separation authority directed an’ honorable discharge due to homosexual conduct.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3171 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application 2 December 2014. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrati regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of t Board. Your commanding officer then recommended you for administrative separation with an other than honorable (OTH) characterization of service discharge due to misconduct (drug abuse - use).
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3171 14_Redacted
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application 2 December 2014. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Your commanding officer then recommended you for administrative separation with an other than honorable (OTH) characterization of service discharge due to Misconduct (drug abuse - use).
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3174 14
oOn 7 December 2007, he was counselled regarding being in a Class III (non- deployable) dental status and warned that unless he corrected his dental issues, he was subject to administrative separation. RECOMMENDATION: a: That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected to show that on 27 August 2008, he was issued an RE-3G reentry code vice the RE-4 now of record. a Recorder 5.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3175 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting an upgrade of his general characterization of service, and that he receive half separation pay as a result of his discharge for alcohol rehabilitation failure on 9 November 2012. Sproul, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 11 June 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR318 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1004 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 DIC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was entitled to payment of Involuntary Separation Pay (ISP) when he was discharged. The Board, consisting of Mr. Zsalman, Mr. George, and Mr....
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3184 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 June 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, yegulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3187 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “B" Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) . Fxnicios, and Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 2 September 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3188 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enciosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner's Home of Record (HOR) was changed A >. The Board, consisting of Mr. Zsalman, Mr. George, and Mr. Ruskin, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 9 June 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3190 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 June 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3193 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 January 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Finally, Sailcrs discharged by reason of personality disorder would normally be assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code, which is a bar to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3196 14
The Board members also considered your request for a personal appearance; however, they found that the issues in the case were adequately documented ana that a personal appearance would not materially add to the Board's understanding of the issues involved. Thus, your request for a personal appearance has been denied. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3200 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 HCG Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to authorize reimbursement of emergency leave travel. NR3200-14 RECOMMENDATION: That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show that: a....
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3201 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support therecf£, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3202 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Your commanding officer then recommended you for administrative separation with an other than honorable (OTH) characterization of service discharge due to misconduct (drug abuse). Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3204 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. NR3204-14 n official naval Consequently, when applying for a correction of a istence of record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the ex probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3207 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 707 5. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was entitled to payment of Involuntary Separation Pay (ISP) when he was discharged. CONCLUSION Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosure...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3211 14
A three-member panel of the Roard for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 January 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden 1s on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3213 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to an Enlistment Bonus for Source Rate (EBSR). The Board, consisting of Mr. Ruskin, Mr. George, and Mr. Exnicios, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 10 September 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3218 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application cn 9 March 2015. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of Docket No.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3219 14
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by HOMC Memo 7220 MPO of 18 Jul 14, 4 copy of which is attached. Members who are retired ar the benefits. Your application claims, that “I was erroneously denied the ability to convey pest 211 educational penefits Lu my children.” You sise claim that “At sometime between April and June 2010, I made the attempt to transfer my educational benefits to my two oldest children...I was told by the Staff Non-Commissioned Officer in...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3222 14
Petitioner depart ccjggiiiiIySII=IIIIII=0 iii IIIEN wememens, on Permanent Duty Station (PCS) Orders (BUPERS Order 0822) ti CUE << enclosures (6) and (10). The advisory opinion states that the reason the Petitioner is requesting BAH (not in possession of No Fee Passports for dependents) is not covered under the normal 2 Docket NO. The Petitioner’s Permanent Change of Station (PCS) Orders © (BUPERS 0822 dtd 25 Sep 2012) are to reflect that DELAYED TRAVEL of dependents is authorized.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3230 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure {1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the grade on his commission of 18 March 2013 in the Medical Service Corps, U. S. Navy as lieutenant junior grade (pay grade O-2E), rather than ensign (pay grade 0-18). The Board, consisting of Messrs. Genteman, Ivins and Sproul, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3232 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 May 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3233 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 May 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all Material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3234 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 May 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an: official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3237 14
BR three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 May 2014. In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 12 March 2014, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3238 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 May 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3240 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 November 20:4. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...