NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2864 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOK CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 754 5, COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 100° ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 DIC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected Lo establish entitlement to a zone “B" Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB). CONCLUSION Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2889 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he was advanced to ET1/E6 from the March 2011 Navy-wide advancement exam. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Ruskin and George reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 4 August 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on.the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2896 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was entitled to payment of Involuntary Separation Pay (ISP) when he was discharged. The Board, consisting of Mr. Ruskin, Mr. Fxnicios, and Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 2 September 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2901 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. after careful ana conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2908 14
A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 May 2015. Specifically, you provided the statement “I need this for insurance purposes,” as the basis for waiving the statute of limitations. The Board determined that the reason you provided was insufficient to waive the statute of limitations and there is no evidence provided that indicates you were unable to file your application within the three years...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2910 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 November 2014. -After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2911 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 November 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in your case.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2914 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was scrolled approved for an officer appointment as a CWO3 with a Date of Rank of 1 November 2013 vice 1 December 2013. ‘The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Ruskin and George reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 28 May 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2921 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, . filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to an Enlistment Bonus for source Rate (EBSR). The Board, consisting of Mr. Zsalman, Mr. George, and Mr. Ruskin, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 4 Bugust 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below shouid be taken on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2922 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner’s Date of Rank be corrected to show 1 November 2013 vice l December 2013, now of record. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Exnicios and Ruskin reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 21 duly 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2923 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he was advanced to [T2/E5 from the March 2013 Navy-wide advancement exam. 2, The Board, consisting oi Messrs. Zsalman, Ruskin and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 4 August 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2924 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on.the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2925 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to an Enlistment Bonus for Source Rate (EBSR). The Board, consisting of Mr. ?salman, Mr. George, and Mr. Ruskin, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 4 August 2014 and, pursuant to 1ts regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2926 14
NR2926-14 4 Aug 14 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: secretary oF the Navy Sub}: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO Ref: (a) Title 10 u.s.c. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (i) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to afm Enlistment Bonus for Source Rate (EBSR} . c. A copy of this Report of proceedings will be filed...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2928 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, Suite 100% ARLINGTON, VA 22204 JET Docket No. hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to an Enlistment Bonus for Source Rate (EBSR). The Board, consisting of Mr. Zsalman, Mr. George, and Mr. Ruskin, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 16 June 2014 and,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2930 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 §. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (&) Subject, filed enclosure (1) with nereinafter referred to as Petitioner, this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he enlisted in paygrade E-2, vice E-1. 2, The Board, consisting of Mr. Zsalman, Mr. Exnicios, and Mr. Ruskin, reviewed petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 21 July 2014 and, pursuant to ites regulations,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2931 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 38 October 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statuces, regulations, and policies. With regard :to your contention of suffering from PTSD, there is no evidence in the record to Support it, and you submitted no such evidence.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2931 14_Redacted
y 4 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552 Although your application was not filed in a timely manner, the Board found it in the interest of justice to waive the statute of limitations and consider your application on it .
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2932 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with 211 matexiai submitced in suppost thereof, your naval record, and appiicable statutes, regulations, and policies. In this regard, individuals separated within the first 180 days of service are discharged without a characterization of service and you were assigned the appropriate reentry code based on your circumstances. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2932 14_Redacted
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRICCTION Or KAVA ROCeCRDS 7ors, COURTHOUSE FOoAeU, SUI 1@a7 te ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 st No: 2932-14 31 October 2014 This is in reference to your applica tien of your naval record pursuant + t of the United ae 4 V6 tates Code, section 15 Although your application was Board found it in the interes limitations and consider your thy ember panel of the Boa é session, he names 4 a) (D m ct © QO O Q aM 2 Ge Cc BK {T i 4 Q) LS) Ce...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2933 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was scrolled approved for an officer appointment as a CWO3 with a Date of Rank of 1 November 2013 vice 1 December 2013. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Ruskin and George reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 28 May 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2939 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to adjust entitlement to Basic Allowance for Housing (BAH) . The Board, consisting of Mr. gsalman, Mr. George, and Mr. Ruskin, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and iniustice on 25 August 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2940 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-4/AT3 from the March 2013 Navy-wide advancement examination. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Exnicios and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 7 April 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2944 14
Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative reguiations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board, Documentary material considered by the Board consiste@ of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2951 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 &. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, - hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner's Home of Record (HOR) was changed to Sedro Woolley, WA. The Board, consisting cf Qi ims/% aay au allegations of error and injustice on reviewed Petitioner’s a December 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2952 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinaiter yeferred to as Petitioner, Filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the Petitioner reenlisted and eligible for advancement under the provisions of the Selective Training and Reenlistment (STAR) 2, The Board, consisting of Mr. Ruskin, Mr. Exnicios, and Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice. CONCLUSION Upon review and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2965 14
NR2965-14 2 Sep 14 From: Chairman, Doard for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Ref: ta} Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure {1} with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the Petitioner’s Temporary Additional Duty (TAD) orders were authorized to exceed 180 days. The Board, consisting of Mr. Ruskin, Mr. Exnicios, and Mr....
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2966 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 November 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. In this regard, an RE-4 reentry code must be assigned to all Sailors discharged due to misconduct.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2968 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1} with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he was offered continuation to a date that allows him the opportunity to gain eligibility for Reserve retired pay. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Hicks, Spooner and Swarens, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 21 August 2014, and pursuant to its regulations,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2969 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) . The Board, consisting of Mr. Ruskin, Mr. Exnicios, and Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 2 September 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2970 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that her Performance Mark Average (PMA) for the September 2011 Navy-wide advancement exam cycle 212 should have been 3.8 vice 3.7. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Ruskin and Exnicios reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 21 July 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2971 14
>, The Board, consisting of Mr. Hedrick, Mr. Sproul and Ms. Polk, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 18 November 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the partial corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Subsequently, the BOI recommended that he be separated with an other than honorable (OTH) discharge. The Board concludes that relief in the form of his assigned RE-3P reentry code be changed to read...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2975 14
«DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS /7o1 S. COURTHOUSE-ROAD, SULTE i003 ARLINGTON. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval recora be corrected by changing the acceptance date of his commission as a lieutenant, U. s, Navy Reserve, from 11 January 2014 to 1 December 2013. The Board, consisting of Ms. Countryman and Messrs....
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2990 14
A three-member panel of the Board for correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 February 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2992 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (i) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner signed and accepted her officer Appointment Acceptance and Oath of Office on 24 May 2013 yiee 3 July 2013, that her Pay Entry Base Date (PEBD) he corrected toe reflect the same and that she be reimbursed all pay and allowances authorized due to the change . 2, The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalmen, Exnicios...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2996 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner's Home of Record (HOR) was changed to 2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Zsalman, Mr. George, and Mr. Ruskin, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 18 August 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2997 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, cogether with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record anc applicable statutes, regulations and policies. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval Docket No.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2998 14
panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your. The Board also considered the documents by the Naval Discharge Review Board. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3000 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD 1001 ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490 JET Docket No. NR3000-14 16 Mar 15 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: pecretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL an ICO 2 Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.c. 1552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) HOMC memo 7220 MPO of 20 Feb 15 {3) Subject’s naval record i. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3003 14
DEPARTWCNT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 8. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner’s Date of Rank be corrected to show 1 November 2013 vice 1 December 2013, now of record. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsaiman, Exnicios and Ruskin reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 21 July 2014 and, pursuant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3006 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 November 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3007 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 November 2014. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3009 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS ope RR RAETHUAIeC ROAD SUITE 100% 7018S COURTHO Or RUAY SUITE 100 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 DIC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “B” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB). The Board, consisting of Mr. Ruskin, Mr. Exnicios, and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3010 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 November 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3010 14_Redacted
Documentary material considered by the Board consi your application, together with all material submitted in thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulati and policies After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence sul tted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable erial error or Ln uselce l You enlisted in the Marine Corps and began a period of active duty on 28 June 1968. New evidence is evidence not...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3011 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 March 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3036 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 November 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3042 14
BAN Docket No.NRO3042-14 30 December 2014 From: Chaixman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: secretary of the Navy co anaes enim ated Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF | Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. His overall trait mark average was zn 3.0 overall trait mark average was required for 4 fully _fomorable discharge.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3043 14
BR three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 September 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3047 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 November 2014. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In this regard, an RE-3C reentry code is authorized when a Marine is ‘discharged at the expiration of their term of active obligated service and is not...