NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2413 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, an effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to an @nlistment Bonus for Source Rate (EBSR} . 2, The Board, consisting of Mr. "oalman, Mr. George, and Mr. Ruskin, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 4 August 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2415 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. , You reenlisted in the Navy on 27 June 1983, after more than three years and nine months of prior service. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2416 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 March 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2417 14
A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 March 2015. Specifically, you provided the statement ‘For reason of injustice double jeopardy. The Board determined that _the reason you provided was insufficient to waive the statute of limitations and there .is no evidence provided that indicates you were unable to file your application within the three years from when you learned of your characterization of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2421 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 December 2014. Docket No.NRO2421-14 New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying-for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the - existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2422 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 March 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the ‘burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2423 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS _7a1 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 : TUR Docket No: 2423-14 °23 March 2015 This is in reference’ to your application for correction of your "naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United ~ States Code, Section 1552, ; Although your application was not filed in a timely manner, the Board found it in the interest of justice to waive the statute of limitations and consider your application on...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2425 14
° “A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considéred “your — application on 18 September 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2426 14
three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Fecords, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 31 © March 2015... case because of the diagnosed personality disorder - -and your misconduct, which resulted in NJP. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2427 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 §. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Ruskin and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 28 May 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the , corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2428 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 §. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he is entitled to combat-related special ° compensation (CRSC) for the injuries he sustained in a live fire training accident on 19 January 2012. CONCLUSION: Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2429 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 7O% S, COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 TIR Docket No: 2429-14 13 March 2015 This is in reference to your application for correction of your Naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552, A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval . Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 March 2015. As a result, the Board was unable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2430 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an Docket No.NRO2430-14 official naval record, the burden is on the applicant...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2433 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval ,record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2437 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure {1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to provide reimbursement fFor-a Household Goods (HHG) move. The Board, consisting of Mr. Ruskin, Mr. Midboe, and Mr. Exnicios, | reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 28 October 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2440 14
your ‘Certificate for Release or Discharge from Active Duty (DD Form 214) reflected mistakes’ as the basis for waiving the statute of limitations. The Board determined this was an insufficient reason to waive the statute since there is no evidence provided that indicates you were unable to file your application within the three- years from when you learned of your characterization of service. evidence which was not reasonably available to you when you submitted your application.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2443 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 © ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 JDR Docket No: 2443-14 20 March 2015 Dear AI This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. A three member panel cf the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 March 2015. After careful...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2445 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval recora be corrected to show that Petitioner was scrolled approved for an officer appointment as a CWO3 with a Date of Rank of 1 October 2013 vice 1 November 2013. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Ruskin and George reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 30 June 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2447 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 May 2014. You exercised your procedural right to have your case considered by an administrative discharge board (ADB). Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2448 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference {a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by changing his Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty (DD Form 214) (copy at Tab A to enclosure (1)). Petitioner’s naval record be.corrected by changing block 27 (Reentry Code) of his DD Form 214 from “RE-4” to “RE-1". That Petitioner’s record be further corrected...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2458 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the original enlisted performance evaluation report for 16 November 2011 to 15 August 2012, signed by Lieutenant Commander H. R. F---, Supply Corps, U. S. Navy Reserve, and the evaluation report letter-supplement Gated 25 Ahugust 2013 (copies at Tab B), and replacing them with the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2459 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. n making this determination, the Board concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2460 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was entitled to payment of Involuntary Separation Pay (ISP) when she was discharged. The Board, consisting of Mr. Hedrick, Mr. Ruskin, and Ms. Wilcher, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 30 September 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2462 14
DEPARTWIENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 §. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that his nonjudicial punishment (NIP) was set aside in 2009 and he retained his rank of MM1/E-6 until his end of his obligated service date. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Ruskin and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2468 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was scrolled approved for an officer appointment as a CWO3 with a Date of Rank of 1 November 2013 vice 1 December 2013. CONCLUSION Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2471 14
Docket No: 2471-14 13 March 2015 Dear Sg This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. The Board determined these were insufficient reasons to waive the statute since there is’ no evidence provided that indicates you were unable to file your application within the three years from when you learned of your characterization of service. However, your request must include...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2473 14
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable Material error or injustice. Subsequently, your request for discharge was granted and, on 27 March 1996, you received an other than honorable discharge in lieu of trial by court-martial. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2474 14
A - three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on . You were so discharged on 14 May 1991. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2475 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 March 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in Support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. It also considered your assertion that you were told your discharge would be upgraded six months after discharge.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2476 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all Material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNPC Memo 1780 PERS-314 o— 1 Jul 14, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden igs on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2478 14
A three-member panel of the Boara for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 October 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. New evidence igs evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2479 14
A | three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records; sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 March 2015. Subsequently, administrative discharge action was initiated by reason of misconduct due’ to wrongful drug use. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR248 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 October 2014. After careful and conecientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2481 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 November 2014. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2484 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 February 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2485 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 April 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. In your case, the Board found misconduct and aggravating factors.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2490 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record pe corrected to establish entitlement to an Enlistment Bonus for Source Rate (EBSR). CONCLUSION Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective action. (Date...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2491 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 October 20134. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2492 14
NR2492-14 25 Mar i4 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Sub): Qi ia? Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to modify an immediate reenlistment contract. The Board, consisting of Mr. Zsalman, Mr. George, and Mr. Ruskin, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 24 March...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2495 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 5S. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your appiication on 5 June 2014. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2496 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 August 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2505 14
OS three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on © 1l March 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2508 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL REGORDS 701 §. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure {1} with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to an Enlistment Bonus for Source Rate (EBSR). The Board, consisting of Mr. Zsalman, Mr. George, and Mr. Ruskin, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 9 June 2014 and, pursuant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2515 14
NR2515-14 26 Aug 14 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: Ref: (a) Title 10 u.¢.c. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “Bp” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB). Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2519 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Your request for discharge was granted and on 29 December 1977, you received an other than...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2523 14
The Board, consisting of Mr. Hedrick, Mr. Ruskin, and Ms. Wilcher, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 30 September 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Note: full payment of non-disability separation pay is authorized to the member who has entered into a written agreement with the Navy to serve in the Ready Reserve for a period of not less than 3 years...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2524 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 April 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2527 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 December 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reentry code to individuals who are separated due to unsatisfactory performance in the Ready Reserve.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2535 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 TLG Docket No: 2535-14 2 June 2015 This is in reference to your Application for Correction of Military Record, DD Form 149, dated January 15, 2015, in which you requested your record be corrected to reflect “medically waived from the Cycle #2 2013 Physical Fitness Assessment.” In this regard, you may wish to contact the Department of Navy, PRIMS Manager, 5720 Integrity...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2536 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 JDR Docket No: 2536-14 19 March 2015 Dear Cy This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 March 2015. After careful consideration...