NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2156 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 November 2014. 4 However after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2157 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 §. CONCLUSION Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective action. b. Petitioner recel to the orders written on of ‘fied that quorum was pr e Board’s review and is a true and complete record of deliberations, the Board's proceedings a: ROBERT D. ZSALMAN BARBARA A....
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2158 15_Redacted
e. With Petitioner's application is an appeal for cons i deration of his characterization of service based on his diagnosed post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and a clinical psychological evaluation with progress reports, attesting to the fact that his misconduct and subsequent administrative discharge from the Navy, were the direct result of his PTSD. CONCLUSION: Upon review and consideration of all t~e evidence of/record, the Board cohcludes that Petitioner's request warrants...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2163 14
A three-member panel of the -Board for Correction of Naval Records; sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 March 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. The Board, in its review of your entire record and application carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as your post service...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2164 14
COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 TJR Docket No: 2164-14 13 March 2015 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 March 2015. After careful consideration of your application, the Board concluded that your application was not...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2166 14
A _three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, consideréd.your application on ‘ll March 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Your request for discharge was granted and on 19 September 1975, you received an other than honorable discharge for the good of the service in...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2170 15_Redacted
Your request has been carefully examined by a three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session on 17 March 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application and any material submitted in support of your application. Your assertion of PTSD was carefully considered by the Board in light of the Secretary of Defense’s Memorandum “Supplemental Guidance to Military Boards for Correction of Military/Naval Records...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2178 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 No. NR2178-14 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Te: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO Ref (a) Title 10 U.S.C. A copy of this Report of Proceedings will be filed in Petitioner's naval record.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2180 14
A.- three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, -Sitting in executive session, .considered your application on .. -11l March 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2194 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he declined Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage with spousal concurrence before his retirement. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Ruskin and Exnicios reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 21 July 2014 and, pursuant te its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR220 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 §. The Board, consisting of Mr. 4salman, Mr. Tew, and Ms. White-Olson, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 18 June 2014, and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that he received a reentry code of “RE-3R” (not meeting the professional growth criteria)...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2200 14
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 §. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he declined Survivor Benefit Plan coverage with spousal concurrence, prior to his retirement . The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsaiman, Ruskin and George, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 18 June 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2202 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 401 §, GUURTHOUSE RD SUITE 100% ARLINGTON VA 29204-2490 BAN Docket No: NRO2Z202-14 7 August 2014 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: secretary of the Navy Subj : Ref: (a) Title 1¢ U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that che applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner's received an Entry Date credit for his...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2216 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your , application on 11 March 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In this regard, an RE-4 reentry code is required when a Sailor is discharged and is not recommended for reenlistment.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2223 14
*: three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 March 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2254 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 March 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on;,the applicant to-démonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2256 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 : JDR _ Docket No: 2256-14 26 March 2015 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW NAVAL RECORD of (Ty Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. The Board, consisting of (ay and gay a. reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 16 March 2015, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2256 14_Redacted
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting change of his RE-4 reentry code. The Board, consisting (i i aa reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 16 March 2015, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. In this regard, based upon review of his corrected record, relief...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR230 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 December 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Your case was forwarded recommending that you received a general discharge by reason of misconduct.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2321 14
application on-its merits: - A = three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 March 2015. Subsequently, administrative discharge action was initiated by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2325 14
three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on li March 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2335 14
A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 March 2015. After careful consideration of your application, the Board concluded that your application was not timely filed, and that it would not be in the interest of justice to excuse your failure to submit your application in a timely manner. Specifically, you provided a statement that ‘you would like to utilize some of your benefits (health and school)’ as...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2336 14
The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Gorenflo and Green, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 5 June 2014, and pursuant toits regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. CONCLUSTON : Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence of an error warranting the following corrective action. e. That any...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2338 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 March 2015. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinions furnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated 16 July and 4 December 2014, copies of which are attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2340 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 March 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. As a result, on 2 February 1973, you submitted a written request for an other than honorable discharge in order to avoid trial by court-martial for...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2340 14_Redacted
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 March 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. As a result, on 2 February 1973, you submitted a written request for an other than honorable discharge in order to avoid trial by court-martial for...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2344 14
A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 March 2015. After careful consideration of your application, the Board concluded that your application was not timely filed, and that it would not be in the interest of justice to excuse your failure to submit your application ina timely manner. Specifically, you provided a statement to consider your application ‘for your children and grandchildren’ as a reason...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2354 14
PP pg SOB DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY PN BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Bae ie oF bin! Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, nereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to adjust the entitlement to Overseas Housing Allowance (OHA) and Family Separation Allowance (PSA) . The Board, consisting of Ms. Polk, Mr. Hedrick, and Mr. Sproul, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2358 14
This is in reference to your application fo naval record A three-member panel of the Board e session, mber 2014. accordance with administrative Records, sitting in executiv application on 30 Septe injustice were reviewed in regulations and procedures appl Board. ‘3.E, Members may check TES periodically for status of their application.” There is no evidence that you entered the TEB website to transfer your benefits. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2360 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2369 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 March 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2370 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 March 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Nevertheless, the Board .
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2386 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 DIC Docket No. The Board, consisting of Mr. Zsalman, Mr. George, and Mr. Ruskin, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 4 March 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. , ROBERT D. ZSALMAN Acting Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2389 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Members who are retired are not eligible to transfer. You also stated in your application that you “submitted a retirement request of 1 August 2014."
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2390 14
Your current request has been carefully examined by a three- member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session on 18 March 2015. material submitted in support of your application, and your husband’s prior case file. husband’s mental disorder, even though not previously considered by the Board, was insufficient to establish the existence of material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2391 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 June 2014. However, the Board found no basis to reinstate you or change your reentry code based on your adverse fitness reports, failure of the PFT, service limitation for a sergeant, and non-recommendation for retention. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2394 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 April 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2396 14
A’ three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 March 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR240 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 December 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2400 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 March 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. The Board also considered your assertion that the GCM sentence was.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2403 14
A- ' three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval -Records, sitting in executive. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an:official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2404 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval: Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on - “ 10.April 2015... Finally, the Board concluded that the Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) decision to recharacterize your service to “Honorable” for the --: sole purpose of receiving benefits does not negate your misconduct while: serving on active. for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on- the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2404 14_Redacted
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 April 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2405 14
Pursuant te the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Subject changed his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) election from spouse to former spouse within one year of his divorce on 23 September 2010. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Ruskin and Exnicios reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 21 July 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2407 14
Documentary material considered by the Board congisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board also notes that you have applied for 4 correction to your record for an error that allegedly occurred more than 25 years ago- Under the rules governing this Board, an application for a correction of a naval record must be made within three years after the discovery of the alleged...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2408 14
-A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 March 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2409 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Subsequently, you were processed for an administrative separation by reason of a physical disability, specifically, asthma, which existed prior to enlistment. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR241 14
BR three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on > December 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After waiving your procedural rights, On 7 October 1992, your commanding officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2410 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), ‘Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)") entry dated 23 February 2011 and his rebuttal of the same date, copies of which are at Tab A. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Genteman, Iving and Sproul, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 1’ July...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2412 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1004 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 JDR Docket No: 2412-14 20 March 2015 A three member panel. of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on. After careful consideration of your application, the Board concluded that your application was not timely filed, and that it would not be in the interest of justice to excuse your failure to submit your...