NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2549 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 July 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2560 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. tn addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps (HOMC) memo 1910 MMSR-2 of 1: duly 2014, @ COPY of which was provided to you on 14 July 2014, and is being provided to you now. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2568 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 April 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2569 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, an enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his naval record be corrected by removing an erroneously filed administrative remarks (page 11) entry dated 13 May 2013 which references a period of unauthorized absence (UA) and racially inflammatory comments. of record. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by totally obliterating or removing the verbiage “during the period...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2570 14
The Board, consisting of Messrs. Chapman, Koman and Spain, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on & January 2015, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. CONCLUSION: Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosures (4) and (5), the Board finds the existence of an error and injustice warranting the following...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2573 14
States Code, section 1552, A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your ' application on 18 March 2015. Accordingly, your application has been denied, It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken, You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence within one year from the date of the Board’s decision. Consequently,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2574 14
-A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 March 2015. After careful consideration of your application, the Board concluded that your application was _ not timely filed, and that it would not be in the interest of justice to excuse your failure to submit your application in a timely manner. Specifically, you provided the statement, ‘My life and social standing has been effected for over 30 years.’ as...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2576 14
BR three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 October 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2577 14
Your current request has been carefully examined by a three- member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, any material . New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in your case.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2578 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 March 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2588 14
K i] mn c. Oo = a ct CE @ Qs * h- om " A = n co b- td mtd oO Oo R rt thereof and s, regulations and pol s. In addition, the he advisory opinions f shed by the Navy Personnel Command dated 9 July and 19 August 2014 and the Commanding Officer, Surface Warfare officers School Command (co, SWOSC) dated After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2591 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on | 18 March 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2592 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to authorize reimbursement for a Personally Procured Move (PPM). CONCLUSION Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective action. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2593 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 November 2014. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Subsequently, administrative discharge action was initiated by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2593 14_Redacted
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 November 2014. Documentary material considered by O ed of your application, together with all mater: pport ther naval record, and applicable ions, After and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice You enlisted in the Navy and began...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2595 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by modifying the enlisted performance evaluation ret for 16 November 2011 to 15 November 2012 (copy at Tab A) by removing, from block 43 (*Comments on Performance”), ‘“[Petitioner] had declined to reenlist therefore missing deployment of his unit Therefore he is not recommended for retention.” and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2597 14
.A three-member panel of the: Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of © your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies, After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2613 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S$. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “B” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB), and Continuous Submarine Duty Incentive Pay (CONSUBPAY). ROBERT D. ZSALMAN BRONTE I. MONT a Recorder Acting Recorder 5, Pursuant to the delegation of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2614 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 HD Docket No: NR2614-14 28 August 2014 Dear Petty Officer
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2618 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 September 2014. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by HOMC memo 1070 MIQ dated 23 July 2014, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2619 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 5. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 , TJR Docket No: 2619-14 13 March 2015 Dear This is in reference. The Board determined ‘this ‘was’an insufficient reason to waive the statute since theré is no evidence provided that indicates you were unable to file your application within the three years from when you learned of your characterization of service.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2623 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his RE-4 (not recommended for retention) reentry code be changed per reference (b). The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman and Exnicios and Ms. Montgomery, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 3 June 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2624 14
of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to have his date of rank reset to 1 June 2013 vice 1 October 2013. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, George and Ruskin, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 30 June 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2626 14
ih thres-membex,, panel of the Board for Correction of Naval .. ‘Records, sitting.in executive session, considered your .. a ‘application:on 25 March 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Finally, an RE-4 reentry code must be assigned to all Sailors discharged due to unsatisfactory performance as a result of having there...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2627 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the lineal position, date of rank, and effective date in the grade of lieutenant colonel he would have been assigned had he been selected for promotion to that grade by the Fiscal Year (FY} 2012 Active Reserve (AR) Lieutenant Colonel Selection Board, vice the FY 2014 AR Lieutenant Colonel...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2628 14
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNP memo 7220 Ser N130C4/14U1228 dated 18 September 2014, a copy of which is attached. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. NR2628-14 on of an official naval Consequently, when applying for a correcti demonstrate the existence of record, the burden is on the applicant to probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2629 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to retroactive Medical Board Certification Pay (BCP) for the period of 1 January 2010 to 30 September 2012. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, George and Ruskin reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 28 May 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the partial...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2631 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 March 2015. The Board, in its review of your entire record and application, carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as your record of service and desire to change your RE-4 reentry code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2632 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 March 2015. Subsequently, administrative discharge action was initiated by reason of misconduct due to wrongful drug use. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2633 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 March 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2635 14
With regard to your assertion, the BCD was ordered executed only after all other punishment had been completed. In other words, if he had ordered your BCD to be executed, you would have been discharged without completing your sentence. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2637 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 March 2015. Finally, the Board also noted that you were fortunate to receive a general discharge since a discharge under other than honorable conditions is often directed when a Sailor is discharged for misconduct. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2638 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 March 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable’...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2639 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 March 2015. Subsequently, administrative discharge action was initiated by reason of misconduct due to commission of a serious offense. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on ‘the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2641 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 March 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2642 14
© three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 March 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient - to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2644 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to an Enlistment Bonus for Source Rate (EBSR). The Board, consisting of Mr. Zealman, Mr. George, and Mr. Ruskin, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 9 June 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2657 14
A ‘three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of - your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. — Consequentiy, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2667 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was entitled to payment of Involuntary Separation Pay (ISP) when he was discharged. The Board, consisting of Mr. Hedrick, Mr. Ruskin, and Ms. Wilcher, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 30 September 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2680 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof and applicable statutes, regulations anc policies. in addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated 10 June 2014, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when Vw | applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2684 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 December 2014. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2685 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 July 2014. Therefore, your case was provided to the Board as is for final determination. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2686 14
The Board, consisting of Messrs. Hedrick, Marquez and Sproul, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 29 October 2014, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. d. In enclosure (4), PERS-32, the NPC office with cognizance over fitness reports, has commented to the effect that both contested fitness reports should be removed. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2692 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive gession, considered your application on 9 December 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2696 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memo 31 July 2014, a copy of which is attached. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2699 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his RE-4 (not recommended for reenlistment) reentry code be changed. The Board, consisting of Ms. Trucco, Ms. Tollefson, and Mr. Gattis, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 4 November 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2701 14
On 29 January 1999, an NPC message directed that her command prepare a page 13 counseling/warning stating that she was being retained in the Navy despite her defective enlistment and induction due to fraudulent entry as evidenced by her failure to disclose pre-service treatment for alcohol abuse. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board concludes that by her disclosing her pre-service DUI, five day alcohol awareness class and wrongful use of marijuana in...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2703 14
1 ely DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2708 14
Your previous case, docket number 2460-11, was denied on 22 November 2011. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 August 2014. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2710 14
SEAETMENT OF ue he ee SRE FOR CORRECTION OF NF VAL PECOPDS ( r cor ACSF Ree ee SUT Phe ARLINGTON. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval 1 i ecul ession, considered your Records, sitting in executive § application on 19 November 2014. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request .