NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1945 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that prior to his transfer to the retirement list on 31 August 2009, he declined Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) category of coverage with spousal concurrence. e. On 17 November 2011, Petitioner stated he submitted a valid and timely request using the DD Form 2656, to the Defense Finance Accounting Service (DFAS) within the 25t...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1948 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 5. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (i) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner had 20 qualifying years vice 19 years, 11 months, 29 days for a non- regular Reserve retirement. “MONTGOMERY ROBERT D. ZSALMAN hye B Recorder Recorder Act 5s Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6{e) of the revised...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1972 14
ree WRTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR SORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORBS 701 §. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. -Consequentiy, when applying for a correction of an official s on the applicant to demonstrate the naval record, the burden 1 existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1973 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1984 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 November 2014. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1986 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 7O1 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice, Sincerely, kD Ko ROBERT D. ZSALMAN Acting Executive Director Enclosure
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR199 14
& three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 December 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1998 14
A ‘three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 March 2015. ~ Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, ‘together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and’ policies. ' In this regard, you submitted a request for a general discharge based on your overall record of service, -However,; an ADB and your...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR202 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 December 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2045 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction.of Naval Records, sitting in executive. Your ‘record “further reflects that on 19 October 2010, the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) changed your characterization of service to “honorable” and your narrative reason for separation to “Secretarial Authority.” © 000 er beh a The Board, in its review of your entire record and application, carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as your desire to change your RE-4 reenlistment...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2049 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 October 2014. You are advised that no discharge is upgraded due merely to the passage of time or post service good conduct. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2074 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 §. The Board, consisting of Mr. Zsalman, Mr. George, and Mr. Ruskin, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 4 March 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. : , c. The Petitioner was advanced to Petty Officer Second Class cftective (> d. A copy of this Report of Proceedings will be filed...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2075 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 April 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, tthe burden is on the applicant to ‘demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2076 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner’s date of rank of 18 May 2007 would have made him eligible and selected for the FY13 0-4 Reserve Promotion Board. The Board, consisting of Messrs. 4salman, Exnicios and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 7 April 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2080 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the original fitness report for 31 January to 1 December 2012, together with a ietter transmitting a supplemental report for the same period, so chat the supplemental report will be the only report in the record for this period. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Chapman, Marquez and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2082 14
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNRFC memo 5420 Ser N1/1169 of 20 Nov 14, a copy of which is attached. Under the governing regulations, to be eligible to transfer benefits, a member must be on active duty or in the selective reserve at the time of the election to transfer. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2083 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, an enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting removal of derogatory material, specifically, a nonjudicial punishment (NIP) dated 18 June 2010, an undated administrative remarks (page 11) entry, an adverse Fitness Report (FITREP), and documentation regarding Relief For Cause (RFC), from her naval record. Enclosure (3) applies, 2. pine Board, consisting cf iii reviewed Petitioner's allegations of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2085 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 February 2015. However, two months later, on 26 August 1969, you were convicted by SPCM of a 60 day period of UA. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2086 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 September 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. NR2O086-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2089 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 March 2015. your: application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, -and ‘policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2092 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, - sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 March 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. The separation authority agreed with the recommendation of the ADB and directed your commanding officer to issue you an OTH discharge by reason of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2094 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that his spouse (Maira B. Frazier) was enrolled in the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) category of coverage within one year of their marriage on 26 — May 2009. CONCLUSION Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2095 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, 4n effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to cancel an agreement to extend enlistment. Exnicios, and Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 15 September 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2097 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 EGA Docket No: 2097-14 20 March 2015 Dear Gy This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 March 2015. After careful consideration...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2098 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. In this regard, _ you were assigned the appropriate reentry code based on your circumstances. The Board, in its review of your entire record and application, carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as your record of service and desire to change your reentry code.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2101 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NSSC letter 4050 Ser 142/079 dated 6 May 2014, 4 copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden 1s on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2102 14
A three-member panel of the Board for correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 September 2014. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memo 1160 Ser 811/144 dated 11 July 2014, a Copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2105 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 7O1 5, COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 TAL Docket No: 2105-14 13 March. A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval . Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 March 2015.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2106 14
Naval Records; sitting in executive session, considered your application on |. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying - for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on .
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2107 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of | your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable Statutes, regulations, and policies. misconduct. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2112 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 March 2015. At that time, you were assigned an RE-3P (failure to meet physical/medical standards) reentry code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2113 14
LAPP 9 Pt ROD DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BES Y® BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS | SS, i SS oS + \ 704 S, COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 we We J ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 DIC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was entitled to payment of Involuntary Separation Pay (ISP) when he was discharged. The Board,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2114 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Subsequently, administrative discharge action was initiated by reason of misconduct due to a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2115 14
A , three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 ~ March 2015: The names and votes of the members of the panel will -be furnished upon.request. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. ‘applying for a correction of an official naval record, the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2116 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY EcoRDS BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVALR 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2450 TUR Docket No: 2116-14 23 March 2015 naval récord pursuant to the provisions of Title-10, united States Code, Section 1552. After waiving your procedural rights to consult with legal counsel and to present your case to an administrative discharge board, on 15 August 1983, you were issued an other than honorable discharge by reason of misconduct and assigned an...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2117 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Recc sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 December 2014. Nevertheless, the Board found that these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given the seriousness of your misconduct. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2119 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 February 2015. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its a@ecision in your case. Conseguently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR212 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 December 2014. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2120 14
The Board also considered your letters dated 8 August and 13 November 2014 each with enclosures. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2122 14
A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 March 2015. Specifically, you provided a statement that you ‘were told to wait for about seven years after being discharged before applying for an upgrade of your character of service, and that your- character reference letters and post service conduct should be ‘taken into.consideration’ as the basis for waiving the statute of limitations. The Board determined...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2126 14
Docket No: .2126-14 13 March 2015 Dear Qa This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. a ; A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 March 2015. After careful consideration of your application, the Board concluded that your application was not timely filed, and that it would not be in the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2133 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 July 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2134 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Shortly thereafter, on 30 March 2009, you were counselled and advised that because of your NJP you would be assigned an RE-3C reenlistment code. Consequently, when-applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2136 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 November 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, Ol1 and p cies LlGrws After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2137 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 March 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2138 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 ‘March 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. On 9 November 2013, you were honorably discharged from active duty at completion of required service and assigned an RE-3C reenlistment code.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2149 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 March 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2151 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 March 2015. , The Board, in its review of your entire record and application, carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as your desire to upgrade your character of service and assertion of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) as a reason for your misconduct. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2153 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to modify an immediate reenlistment contract. The 3 year immediate reenlistment contract (NAVPERS 1070/6001), executed on or about 24 July 2012, is modified to read: I am reenlisting in the United States Navy/Naval Reserve for 3 years from “25 duly 0212" vice “24 July 2012" unless*sooner...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2154 14
- three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 March 2015. You elected to waive the right to have your case heard by a board of officers. You were so discharged on 6 December 1972.