NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1725 14
A three-member panel, of the Board far Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 March 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies, After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1733 14
Pursuant to the provisions of yeference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a prior Service Affiliation Bonus. 2, The Board, consisting of Mr. Ruskin, Ms. McCain, and Mr. Exnicios, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 12 November 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1742 14
A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your .application on 11 March 2015. the interest of justice to excuse your failure to submit your application in a timely manner. such additional evidence, further review of your application is not possible: > o oo : -" '* ROBERT.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1746 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 March 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1747 14
Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to. The Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps (HOMC) memo 1400/3 MMPR-2 of 16 May 2014, a copy of which was previously provided to you and which is now enclosed. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1752 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with ail material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. A minority contract is defined as an sndividual who, upon entry into the U.S armed Services, is 17 years old (a minority) and is willing to reenlist after their initial contract expires. Consequentiy, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1753 14
BR three-member panel of the Boara for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 November 2014. Presumably, after waiving your procedural right to consult with legal counsel and to present your case to an administrative discharge board (ADB), your commanding officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct. The Board, in its review of your entire record and application, carefully weighed all...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1770 14
Board for Correction of Naval Records TO: Secretary of the Navy Sub}: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO Ref: (a) Table 10 U.S.€. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to provide reimbursement for a Household Goods (HHG) move. The Board, consisting of Mr. Zsalman, Mr. George, and Mr. Ruskin, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1774 14
654 (Repeal) Encl: (1) DD Form 149 with attachments (2) Case summary (3) Subject's naval record i. Pursuant to the provisions of reference {a}, Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that her general characterization of service, separation program designator (SPD) “HRA1”, RE-4 (not recommended for retention) reentry code, and narrative reason for separation “HOMOSEXUAL ACT” be changed per reference (b). It...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1778 14
Although your application was not filed in a timely manner, the Board found it in the interest of justice to waive the statute of limitations and consider your application on its merits. A three member panél of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 March 2015. You may request reconsideration of this decision within one year from the date of the Board’s decision.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1779 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 March 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Subsequently, administrative discharge action was initiated by reason of misconduct due to wrongful drug use.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1782 14
three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 March 2015. Subsequently, on 15 November 1994, administrative discharge action was initiated disorder, You waived your rights to consult counsel, submit a statement, or have your case heard by an administrative discharge board (ADB). Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1785 14
limitations and consider your application on its merits.- A - three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 March 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Subsequently, administrative discharge action was initiated by reason of misconduct due to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1792 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 March 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. It also appears that your request for discharge was granted since you received an other than honorable discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1805 14
BR three-member panel of the Board for correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 December 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all — material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. as a result of the foregoing period of UA totalling 203.days, you submitted a written request for an other than honorable discharge in order...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1805 14_Redacted
A chree-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 December 201~ . Documentary material co~sidered by the Board consisted o: your application, together with a:l material submitted in support thereo:, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regula~ions, and po_icies. During this period of UA, May 1991, you were declared a deserter.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1807 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 March 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1810 14
three-member panel of the Board for: Correction of Naval Records, - sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 March 2015. your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Subsequently, administrative discharge action was initiated by reason of misconduct due to commission of a serious offense.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1811 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 March 2015. The Board, in its review of your entire record and application, carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as your record of service and desire to upgrade your discharge. Consequently, .when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1813 14
At the time of your service, a conduct average of 4.0 was required for a fully honorable characterization of service, The Board, in its review of your entire record and application, carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as your record of service, Vietnam service , desire to upgrade your discharge and assertion that your post service diagnosed Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) contributed to your misconduct while on active duty. The policy specifically...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1815 14
-A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 March 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1819 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed ericlosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to modify an immediate reenlistment contract. The Board, consisting of Mr. Zoalman, Mr. George, and Mr. Ruskin, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 18 February 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1820 14
On 23 October 2013, you were sent a letter stating that your case was denied. You have not provided any new or material evidence that would change the Board’s decision. Therefore, your reconsideration request has been denied.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1821 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered yout application on 4 August 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable stacutes, regulations and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was snsufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1824 14
AR three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 July 2014, Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Under the rules governing this Board, an application for a correction of a naval record must be made within three years after the discovery of the alleged error. Consequently, when applying...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1831 14
aA three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 February 2015. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant a change in the reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1835 14
| The Board, in its review of your entire record and application, . Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant relief in your case because of the seriousness of your alcohol related misconduct, nonrecommendation for retention or reenlistment, and failure to successfully complete a rehabilitation program. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1837 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction .of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1840 14
_ BPE RS DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BEOOre™s BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 761 S COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490 BAN Docket No.NRO1840-14 27 October 2014 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW_OF NAVAL RECORD ICO q Ref: {a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure {1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that, as...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1841 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on >6 June 2014. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated 15 May 2014, a copy of which is attached, after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1844 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 March 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your husband’s naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Subsequently, he was notified of pending administrative separation by reason of misconduct due to frequent involvement, at which time he...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1847 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 March 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1852 14
COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 100 ee DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY = ee ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 DIC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner declined enrollment in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) as he was not married. The Board, consisting of Mr. zsalman, Mr. George, and Mr. Ruskin, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1854 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with|this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he was released from active duty as a CPL/E-4 vice LCPL/E-3, and that he received a combiit action ribbon for his service in Vietnam. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsaiman, Ruskin and George, reviewed Petitione|*’s allegations of error and injustice on 18 August 2014 and, pirsuant to its regulations, determined...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1865 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by HOMC memo 1910 MMSR-2 dated 11 July 2014, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1866 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was entitled to payment of Involuntary Separation Pay (ISP) when he was discharged. The Board, consisting of Mr. Zsalman, Mr. George, and Mr. Ruskin, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 4 August 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1867 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consi ‘stead of your appli ication, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, 4 and poli Lc1es. DEDAE waiving your procedural right to cons ult with legal counsel and to present your case to an administrative discharge board (ADB), your commanding officer recommended dis charge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse. Consequently,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1869 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DCG 20370-5100 SIN Docket No: 01869-14 1 May 2014 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL OF RECORD es Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting the removal of time lost reflected in block 29 {dates o time lost during this...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1870 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 February 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1885 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted ef your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. in addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNRFC Memo 5420 Ser N1/c537 of 14 May 14, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden 15 0 existence of probable materia Enclosure: Docket No.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1889 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to provide reimbursement for 4 Household Goods (HHG) move. The Board, consisting of Mr. Zsalman, Mr. George, and Mr. Ruskin, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 4 August 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1900 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 August 2014. After careful and conscienticus consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1907 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 April 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all Material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Shortly thereafter, you were notified of pending administrative separation by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse at which time you waived your...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR191 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After careful and: conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Boara found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1916 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 bJCc Docket No. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 October 2014. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNP memo 7220 Ser N130C4/14U1218 dated 17 September 2014, a copy of which is attached.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1919 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 February 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1929 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 March 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. On 15 August 1988, you received a BCD after appellate review was complete.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1931 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 March 2015. separation by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse at which time you waived your procedural rights to consult with legal counsel and to present your case to an administrative discharge board (ADB). Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1935 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 §. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to remove the Loan Repayment Program (LRP) from his enlistment guarantees. The Board, consisting of Mr. Zsalman, Mr. George and Ruskin, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 2 June 2014 and, pursuant to its...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1936 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 TAL Docket No: 1936-14 9 July 2015 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Les Secretary of the Navy Sub]: REVIEW NAVAL RECORD OF (i USN, aN Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his narrative reason for separation...