NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1353 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 March 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in _Support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, _regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1359 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 March 2015. The Board, in its review of your entire record and application, carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as your record of service and desire to upgrade your reentry code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1369 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that ‘the applicable naval record be corrected to modify an immediate reenlistment contract, and Petitioner eligible for advancement under the provisions of the Selective Training and Reenlistment (STAR) program. The Board, consisting of Mr: Zsalman, Mr. George, and Mr. Ruskin, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on .18...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1391 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 7015. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 June 2014. Consequently, when nS applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1451 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 November 2014. Subsequently, you were notified of pending administrative separation by reason of misconduct at which time you waived your procedural rights to consult with legal counsel and to present your case to an administrative discharge board (ADB). Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1460 14
A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 May 2015. After careful consideration of your application, the Board concluded that your application was not timely filed, and that it would not be in the interest of justice to excuse your failure to submit your application ina timely manner. Specifically, you stated “you have never been able to find out why or when it changed” as a reason for waiving the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1534 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on J August 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1537 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 §. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure {1) with this Board requesting, 12 effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the Petitioner reenlisted and eligible for advancement under the provisions of the Selective Training and Reenlistment (STAR) program. CONCLUSION Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR154 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 November 2014. after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or” injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1541 14
A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 March 2015. After careful consideration of your application, the Board concluded that your application was not timely filed, and that it would not be in the interest of justice to excuse your failure to submit your application ina timely manner. Specifically, you provided a statement that ‘you were a good soldier until Vietnam’ as a reason for waiving...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR157 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 July 2014. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1599 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,’ sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 February 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies, After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1603 14
member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting -in executive session, considered your application on 25 February 2015. The Board, in its review of your entire record and application, carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as your desire to upgrade your reentry code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1605 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 7O1 S$. It provides service Discharge Review Boards with the authority to grant requests to re-characterize the discharge to honorable, to change the narrative reason for discharge to “Secretarial Authority”, the Separation Program Designator (SPD) code to “JFF-1" and to change the reentry code to'an immediately eligible reenter category of “RE-10", when the original discharge was based solely on DADT or a similar policy in place...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1607 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Accordingly, your application .
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1609 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Navai Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 June 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1610 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 February 2015. .Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Subsequently, you were notified of pending administrative separation by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse at which time you waived your...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1612 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 February 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1623 14
A three-member panel ofthe Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 February 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1624 14
Board found it in the interest of justice to waive the statute of limitations and consider your application on its merits.-- A. three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 February 2015. Subsequently, administrative discharge action was initiated by reason of misconduct due to wrongful drug use. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1625 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 August 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1626 14
application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 July 2014. This is an important feature of the law because the transferability Docket Ne.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1630 14
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Nevertheless, the Board found that these factors were not sufficient to warrant changing your characterization of service given your diagnoses of a personality disorder, and suicidal ideation, | Accordingly, your application has been denied. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1636 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 November 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies-~ After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1637 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of ‘your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, . Additionally, you were counseled and warned after your first NJP, that further misconduct could result in administrative discharge action. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material * error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR164 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 November 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1643 14
BR three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 July 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with ali material submitted in support thereof and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1644 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 February 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. The Board, in its review of your entire record and application, carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as your desire to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1647 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 September 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1655 14
The Board, consisting of Mr. Zsalman, Ms. Polk, and Mr. Tew, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 30 July 2014, and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that on 2 September 2004, she was assigned an RE-3G reentry code vice the RE-4 reentry code. ROBERT D. ZSALMAN BRIAN J. GEORGE Recorder Acting Recorder S. Pursuant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1661 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enciosure (1} with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that his original date of rank to GySgt be restored to reflect a Gate of rank of 1 November 2013. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsaiman, George and Ruskin reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 28 May 2014 and; pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1663 14
Additionally, the Board considered your response to the advisory opinion dated 20 September 2014. appearance, -However, after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. correction of an official naval to demonstrate the existence of this case.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1666 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 7o1 8S. CONCLUSION: Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence of an error warranting the following corrective action. naval record be returned to the Board, together with a copy of this Report of Proceedings, for retention in a confidential file maintained for such purpose, with no cross reference being made a part of Petitioner's naval record.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1668 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 February 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. A review of your medical prescreening documents revealed no record of you reporting the ankle injury or the history of suicidal thoughts...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1670 14
BR three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your ; application on 29 October 2014. You are antitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of- new and material evidence: within one year from the date of the Board's decision. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1692 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in G applicable statutes, support thereof, your naval record an regulations and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1693 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 April 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1694 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1695 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with ail material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1696 14
Documentary material consider of your application, together with al naval record an panel of the Board for ession Your 4 dance cable regulations and report of the Headqua Review Board (PERB), attached. Sw JSR Docket No: NR1696-14 10 April 2014 son for correction of your f title 10 of the Correction of Naval , considered your Lllegations of error and with administrative to the proceedings of this ed by the Board consisted 1 material submitted in d applicable statutes, dad considered...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1697 14
L RECORDS JSR Docket No: NRL697-14 10 April 2014 Dear sergeant orrection of Naval considered your ations of error istrative ceedings of this d consisted a three-member panel of the Board for ¢ Records, sitting in executive session, lication on 10 April 2014. your alleg rdance with admin to the pro and record and apP attached. onsideration of the entire submitted was £ probable material In this connection, the Board substantially mmnents contained in the report of the PERE. Consequently,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1698 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive sessicn, considered your application on 10 April 2014. after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official» naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1699 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 April 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1703 14
In your previous case, docket number 10449-08, the Board denied this relief on 23 January 2009. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, reconsidered your case on 10 April 2014. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1706 14
DEPARTMENT OF BOARD FOR CORRE 7o1 §. COURTHO ARLINGTON, THE NAVY CTION OF NAVAL RECORDS USE ROAD, SUITE 1001 VA 22204-2490 JSR Docket No: NR1706-14 10 April 2014 This i naval record pur United States Code, ion on 10 April 2014. applicat reviewe injustice were regulations and proce Board. of Naval considered your s of error and with administrative to the proceedings of this red 11 material s pplicable the Board performance Evaluation a copy of which is tion of the entire evidence submitted...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1711 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 April 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1712 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1714 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 October 2014. In addition, the Board considered the reports of the Headquarters Marine Corps (HQMC) Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 4 February 2014 and 18 July 2014 as amended by the HOMC e-mail dated 5 August 2014, copies of which are attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR172 14_Redacted
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 October 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted’ of your application, together with all Material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 16 May 1969, you were again convicted by SPCM for two instances of UA from your unit totaling a period of 12 days and failure to go to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1724 14
ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490 BAN Docket No.NRO1724-14 11 September 2014 This is in reference to your recent Application for Correction of Naval Record (DD Form Da Gy « A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 September 2014. your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material...