NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1266 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your | application on 2 June 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an Docket No.NRO1266-14 official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR12661 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 March 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official ‘naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1268 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 February 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR12687 14
‘A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on-6 January 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. In your case, the Board determined that a personal appearance was not necessary and considered your case based on the evidence of record.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR12688 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 §. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to cancel an agreement to extend enlistment, and then cancel and issue, an immediate reenlistment contract. CONCLUSION Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR12712 14
The Board, in its review of your record and application, which included your counsel’s brief, carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as your desire to upgrade your other than honorable discharge, to be reinstated in the military, and change your narrative reason for separation/separation code and reenlistment code. In this regard, the Board determined that your desires and your counsel’s allegations were not enough to outweigh the significant misconduct you committed. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1272 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 June 2014. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by HQMC Memo 1070 MMRP-13 of 5 May 14, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1275 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, an enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his record be corrected by removing derogatory material, specifically, an administrative remarks {page 11) entry dated 6 January 2009 which incorrectly reflects that he was issued a traffic citation for failure to obey a stop sign. CONCLUSION: Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the AO and the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR12782 14
You previously petitione advised in our letter that your application member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval sitting in executive session on 4 Pepruaty 2015. In addition, the Board provided liberal consideration to finding PTSD where a service record substantiated the existence of PTSD symptoms or when a civilian provider diagnosed PTSD After applying these guidelines to the evidence in the case, the Board was not able to substantiate the existence of PTSD in your case, It is...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR12782 14_Redacted
SUITE 10975 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 ihm eference to your latest reconsidera 17 November 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to,m&aking its decision in your case. Consequently, when applying for a’ correction of an official record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of material error or in} ustice .
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR12810 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 April 2015. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. NR12810-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR12825 14
Your current request has been carefully examined by a three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session on 4 March 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application and any material submitted in support of your application. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board determined that the statements you provided and assertion of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) asa reason for...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR12849 14
ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490 TOE Docket Nec 12849-14 5856-12 17 December 2014 aoplication for correcti provisions of Title 10, BR three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 December 2014 The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1286 14
Although your application was not filed in a timely manner, the Board found it in the interest of justice to waive the statute 'o limitations and consider your application on its merits, A three-member panel of the ‘Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on ° 24 February 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1288 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive gession, considered your application. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with ali material submitted in support thereof, your navai record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR12882 14
NR12882-14 6 Jan 15 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ico Ref: (a) Title 10 u.s.c. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the Petitioner was advanced under the provisions of Naval 2. NR12882-14 RECOMMENDATION: That Petitioner's naval record be...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1289 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application. Following your release from civil confinement, you returned to military custody. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR12907 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to modify an immediate reenlistment contract. The Board, consisting of ny reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 5 January 2015 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1292 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 February 2015.. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. In this regard, you were assigned the appropriate reentry code based on your circumstances.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR12921 14
FO. Finally, the medical documentation you provided does not negate the diagnoses of your depressive disorder, history of drug abuse, or ADHD. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR12922 14
1552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149. w/attachments {2) Email from HOMC Military Personnel Law Branch dtd 11 Dec 2014 1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, to remove his Fiscal Year 2016 “failure to select” for the Lieutenant Colonel (LtCol) Promotion Selection Board, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on i anuary 2015 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1293 14
three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 February 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1295 14
RB three-member panel of the Board ‘for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 May 2014. in addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated 3 April 2014, a copy of which +s attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1296 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 March 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable Material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR12990 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your . After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on ' €hée applicant to demonstrate t istence o robable materi error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR12997 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 January 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1301 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 July 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the — existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR13098 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 April 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR13098 14_Redacted
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 April 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR13102 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing his failures of selection before the Fiscal Year (FY) 2013 and 2015 Chief Warrant Officer 5 (CWO5) Selection Boards. ‘he Board, consisting of D7 ae, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 29 January 2015, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR13109 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 March 2015. In your case, the Board determined that a personal appearance was not necessary and considered your case based on the evidence of the record. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR13148 14
noted that the Commandant of the Marine Corps (CMC) has Girected modifying the contested report by removing, from section I (reporting senior’s “Directed and Additional comments”), “MRO [Marine reported on] requires supervision for daily tasks outside the norm and of a more complex nature." Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval recoré and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR13149 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 January 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in ‘Support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, reguiations and policies, In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 8 December 2014, a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR13160 14
Sincerely, ROBERT J. O'NEILL Executive Director DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S, COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490 BAN Docket No.NROQ6157-14 19 Taswitoass OAT aa A eve This ig in reference to your application for correction to your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 United States Code, section 1552. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR13168 14_Redacted
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 July 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Specifically, the Board looked to see whether it was a causative factor in your misconduct and weighed it against the severity of your actions.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR132 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 March 2015. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board, Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR13226 14
Because your application was submitted with new evidence not previously considered, the Board found it in the interest of justice to review your application. Your current request has been carefully examined by a three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session on 8 May 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board determined that your assertion of post- traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and the letter you...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR13226 14_Redacted
Because your application was submitted with new evidence not previously considered, the Board found it in the interest of justice to review your application. Your current request has been carefully examined by a three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session on 8 May 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board determined that your assertion of post- traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and the letter you...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1323 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 July 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the.applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1325 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNRC Memo 1133 Ser N32 of 15 Apr 14, a copy of which is attached. However, the Board agreed with the advisory opinion that there was no evidence found to indicate that you had completed three years of JROTC as is required...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR13250 14
Your current request has been carefully examined by a three- member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application and any material submitted in support of your application. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an’official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR13252 14
Because your application was submitted with new evidence not previously considered, the Board found it in the interest of justice to review your application. Your current request has been carefully examined by a three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session on 15 May 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application and any material submitted in support of your application.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR13255 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 TUR Docket No: 13255-14 19 February 2015 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records cite Ref: (a) 10 U.S.c. In this regard, this evidence led the TUR Docket No: 13255-14 Board to reasonably conclude that the PTSD condition was directly related to his traumatic service connected events in RVN, existed at the time of his discharge, and subsequently resulted in...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR13255 14_Redacted
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 TUR Docket No: 13255-14 19 February 2015 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records TO: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW a RECORD OF EX-SN Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. 1552 (bo) SECDEF Memorandum, “Supplemental Guidance to Military Boards for Correction of Military/Naval Records Considering Discharge Upgrade Requests by Veterans Claiming Post Traumatic Stress Disorder”...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR13277 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with ali material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in your case. “Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR13277 14_Redacted
A three-member’ panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, ‘considered your application on 6 January 2015. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in your case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR13302 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 January 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. The Board concluded that your commanding officer's decision to impose NJP was appropriate, and it was administratively and procedurally correct...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR13401 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 EGA Docket No: 13401-14 29 April 2015 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 April 2015. After careful consideration of your...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1346 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, reconsidered your case on 22 May 2014. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1352 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 November 2014. As a result of your last NJP, a line of duty investigation (LOD) into injuries sustained by you was conducted. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.