NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3131-13
Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 February 2014. Documentary material considered by .the Board consisted of your application, together. _ Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3136-13
‘A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 February 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3140-13
Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 February 2014. On 14 July 1978 the discharge authority approved this recommendation and directed a general discharge by reason of unsuitability, and on 21 July 1978, you were so separated. -Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on-the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3141-13
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701-5, COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 - ARLINGTON, VA 22204-24906 : TIR
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3148-13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your - application on 19 February 2014. The discharge authority approved this recommendation and directed your commanding officer to issue you an other than honorable discharge by reason of: misconduct, and on: 28 October 1988, “you Were’ 80. discharged. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR315-13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 duly 2013. Your request was approved, and you received an undesirable discharge on 17 February 1976. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3154-13
session, considered ‘your application on 19 February 2014. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge because of the seriousness of your repetitive misconduct which included theft from a fellow Marine and resulted in two NJPs and two SPCMs. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3159-13
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or | injustice. As such, on 10 July 1984, ‘you enlisted in the Marine Corps Reserve and began a period of active duty for training.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3163-13
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that his selection to Chief Petty Officer/E-7 be reinstated effective 16 August 2011. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman and George, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 20 August 2013 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3166-13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 July 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the reports of the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 3 April and 17 May...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3179 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 April 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3182 13
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 §. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 January 2014. :Your.allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3187 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 February 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequentiy, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3198-13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 February 2014. regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board, Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, Regu Lenore and policies. Consequently, when applying for-a correction of an official Naval record,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3199 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 October 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3203 13
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, an enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his naval record be corrected by removing incomplete and inaccurate derogatory material, specifically, a unit punishment book (UPB) entry which documents a nonjudicial punishment (NUP) dated 14 March 2002, an offense and punishments (page 12) entry dated 14 March 2002, anda fitness report (FITREP) for the period from 11 July 2001 to 14 March...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3204 13
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070”) entry dated 24 September 2007 (copy at Tab A). d. In enclosure (2), the Headquarters Marine Corps office with cognizance over the subject matter of Petitioner's case has commented to the effect his request should...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3207-13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction: of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 February 2014. discharge. of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3209-13
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNPC Memo 1780 PERS-314 atd 21 Jun 13, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR321 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 October 2013. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3212-13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your’ application 4 February 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. You waived your procedural right to an administrative discharge board (ADB).. On 3 October 1986, you received an OTH characterization of service...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3216-13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board also considered the report of the Naval Discharge Review Board dated 21 Senuaxy 1999, a copy GE which is attached.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3224-13
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701. You enlisted in the Navy Reserve on 22 July 1965. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3231-13
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted — of your application, together with all material submitted in support: thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. On 5S March 1963, you received an OTH characterization of service discharge due to misconduct. — Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3240-13
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he transferred from former member status to the Retired Reserve List. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, 4salman and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 30 July 2013 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3241-13
| A three-member panel of the Board for Correction-of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application 4 February 2014. On 21 March 1986, you received an OTH characterization of service discharge due to misconduct, and were assigned an RE-4 (not recommended for retention) reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3242-13
material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in “support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The sentence at your SPCM included a bad conduct discharge (BCD). Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3245 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on: 24 March 2014. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinions furnished by CNPC Memo 1780 PERS-314 of 19 Jun 13 and CNPC Memo 1780 PERS-314 of 31 Oct 13, a copies of which are attached, and were previously provided. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the _ existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3249-13
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY - BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701.5. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his other than honorable (OTH) discharge issued on 10 April 1968 be upgraded to an honorable discharge. That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected to show that the narrative reason for separation was “Secretarial Authority” vice “Unfitness”, and that he was issued...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3251-13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 February 2014. on 16 January 1997, the ADB found that you committed misconduct and recommended that _ You be separated with an OTH discharge. on 14 March 1997, the separation The Board, in its review of your application, carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as your prior honorable service, Nevertheless, the Board found that these factors...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3253-13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 February 2014. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors were not sufficiént to warrant recharacterization- of your discharge because of the seriousness of your...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3268-13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 February 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3273 13
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 JBH Docket No. g. Funding for the Petitioner’s separation orders was not issued until 9 March 2012. h. In November 2012, Petitioner submitted an application to this Board. The Board found that, while there is no evidence of an error, as a general matter of equity, Docket No.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3274-13
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNPC Memo 1780 PERS-314 dtd 27 Jun 13, a copy of which is attached. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official Docket No.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3285-13
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Nonetheless, you denied participating and/or engaging in any homosexual acts. On 22 May 1963 you were notified of administrative separation by reason of unfitness due to participating in indecent acts or offenses.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3295-13
654 (Repeal) Enel: (1) DD Form 149 with attachments (2) Subject's naval record 1.° Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1} with this Board requesting, in effect, that her narrative reason for separation (Unfitness) issued on 23 May 1951, be changed to “Secretarial Authority”. d. Reference (b) sets forth the Department of the Navy's policies, standards, and procedures for administratively separating enlisted service...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3296 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 November 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. On 6 May 1965 a-special court-martial convened and found you guilty of absence from your appointed place of duty and willful disobedience -of a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3300-13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 February 2014. On 8 July 1948, you were convicted by summary court-martial (SCM) of UA from your unit for a period of four days and: missing ‘ship's movement. The Board, in its review of your application, carefully weighed all potentiaily mitigating factors, such as your prior honorable service.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3304 13
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1} with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner’s date of rank should be 18 May 2007 vice 11 February 2008, and that he be promoted to LCDR/0-4 from the FY13 Navy-Reserve Promotion Board. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 25 November 2013 and, pursuant to its...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3306-13
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable ‘Material error or -- injustice. -You were notified of pending: administrative discharge processing with an other...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3308-13
= A three- member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in.executive session, considered your application on 12 February 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in _ support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, " regulations, and policies. An RE- 4 reentry code must be assigned to all Marines discharged due to — an SPCM conviction.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3311-13
| A three-member panel of the Board. for Correction of Naval » Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 February 2013. On 20 March 1992, you received the OTH discharge for misconduct (drug abuse).
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3315-13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval — Records, sitting in executive session, considered your. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. ,Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official ‘naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR332 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, reconsidered your case on 24 October 2013. In view of the above, the Board again voted to deny the requested relief. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3329-13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 June 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. In this regard, you were assigned the appropriate reentry code based on your circumstances.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3341-13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your | application on 26 February 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of- your application, tegether with all material submitted in ‘support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3342-13
1980, you made a written request for an other _ than honorable (OTH) discharge to-avoid trial by court-martial for three instances of UA from your unit for a period totaling 30 days, failure to go to you appointed place of duty, . ‘The Board, in its review of your entire record and application, carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as recharacterization of your. when your request for.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3345-13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval ' Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 February 2014. The Board, in its review of your application, carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as your prior honorable service. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official — naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of ‘probable Material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3348 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 September 2014. On 15 October 2008, you were discharged in pay grade E-2 with a general characterization of service due to misconduct, and assigned an RE-4 reentry code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR335-13
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 7901S. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he accepted his commission as a lieutenant commander in the Medical Corps of the Navy Reserve on i July 2012, rather than 12 December 2012. c. In enclosure (3), PERS-80, the NPC office with cognizance over officer...