DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAYAL RECORDS
FOS. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE {001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490
TUR
Docket No: 3131-13
19 February 2014
This is in reference to. your application for correction of. your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United
States Code, Section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for. Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 19 February 2014. .The names and votes of the
members of the panel will be furnished: upon request. ‘Your -
allegations of error: and injustice were reviewed in accordance
with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by
.the Board consisted of your application, together. with all
material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and
applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient
to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. oe
You: enlisted in the Navy and began a period of active duty on 25
June 1981.. You served for nearly three years without
disciplinary incident, but duririg the period from 24 May 1984 to
25 February 1985,-you received nonjudicial punishment (NJP) on
six occasions. Your offenses’ were’ two periods of absence from
your appointed place of duty, destruction of government property,
conduct prejudicial to good order and discipline, unlawfully
carrying a weapon (knife) , ‘dereliction of duty, and two
Specifications of wrongful use of marijuana.
On 2 April 1985 you were notified of: administrative separation by
reason of misconduct due to drug abuse. After consulting’ with
legal counsel, you elected to present your case to an
administrative: ‘discharge beard (ADB). On 2 May 1985 an ADB .
“recommended separation under hohorable-. conditions by reason of
misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct, frequent involvement.
of a discreditable nature with military authorities, and drug.
abuse. On 5 June 1985 your’ commanding officer, in concurrence
with the ADB, also recommended separation under honorable
conditions by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct
and drug abuse. The discharge authority approved these
. recommendations for separation and directed a general discharge
under honorable conditions by reason of misconduct, and on 12
. June 1985 you were so separated.
The Board, in its review of your entire record and application,
carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as
your period of satisfactory service, post’ service conduct, and
desire to upgrade your discharge: Nevertheless, the Board
concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant relief in
your case because of the seriousness of your repetitive
misconduct which resulted in six NUJPs and included drug abuse.
Accordingly, your application has been denied.
“It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
_ favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material .
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a’.
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. _
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
WR a I, Cae
ROBERT BD. ALMAN
Acting Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3136-13
‘A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 February 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3565-13
‘A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 March 2014... (SPCM) o£ a one day period of /UA, absence from your appointed place of duty, and two specifications of wrongful use’ of cocaine. The Board, in its review of your record and application, .
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2474-13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 February 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. ‘Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05711-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You reenlisted in the Navy on 22 June 1981 after eight years of prior honorable service. On 11...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 11198-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 November 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 26 February 1992 an ADB recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4099-13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application’ on 26 March 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3141-13
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701-5, COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 - ARLINGTON, VA 22204-24906 : TIR
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR6905 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 July 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 03958-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 March 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR6689 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 July 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...