Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3315-13
Original file (NR3315-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 5. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490

- CRS |
- Docket No: 3315-13
18 February 2014

 

This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the
‘United States Code section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval —
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your. -
application on 26 November 2013. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative .
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
of your application, together with all material submitted in

support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies. Oo

The Board found that you served on active duty in the Navy from
16 December 2003 to 10 January 2006, when you were. discharged by
‘reason of alcohol abuse rehabilitation failure, with a general.
discharge.” You were assigned a reentry code of RE-4; as

required by governing directives.

As your present reentry code is’ correct, and you have not —
demonstrated that it would be in the interest of justice for the
Board to assign a. more favorable code as an exception to policy,
there is no basis for granting your request. ‘Accordingly, your -

_.application has been denied. ‘The names and votes of the members

of the panel will be furnished ‘upon~ request.

™
The Board did not consider whether your characterization of
service. or reason for separation should be changed, since you
did not ask for such consideration and you have not exhausted.
your administrative remedies by applying to the Naval Discharge

Review Board (NDRB). You may do so by submitting the attached
DD Form 293 to the NDRB.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such

‘that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have

the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and

Material evidence or other matter not previously considered by ©

the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.

,Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official
‘naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable. Material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

ROBERT D.
Acting Executive Director

Enclosure

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00111-08

    Original file (00111-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, Sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 August 2008. The Board did not consider whether your characterization of service or reason for separation should be changed, since you did not ask for such consideration and you have not exhausted your administrative remedies by applying to the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB). Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 04541-08

    Original file (04541-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 August 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 01803-08

    Original file (01803-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 August 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10669-07

    Original file (10669-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYBOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS2 NAVY ANNEXWASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 CRSDocket No: 10669-0721 May 2008This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code section 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 May 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 07029-08

    Original file (07029-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 July 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 07012-08

    Original file (07012-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 July 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00025-08

    Original file (00025-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 August 2006. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 10421-08

    Original file (10421-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, Sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 November 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a | presumption of regularity attaches to all official records Consequently, when applying...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 06059-07

    Original file (06059-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 April 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10701-07

    Original file (10701-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 April 2008. your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of: your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and...