NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2627-13
NR2627-13 30 Sep 13 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to an Enlistment Bonus for Source Rate (EBSR). The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Zsalman, and Mr. Funicios, reviewed Petitioner’s...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2629-13
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 §. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to an Enlistment Bonus for Source Rate (EBSR). The Board, consisting of Mr. Peiffer, Mr. Zsalman, and Mr. Exnicios, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 30 September 2013 and,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2630-13
Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your | application on 19 February. Because you requested discharge in lieu of trial, you avoided the possibility of a punitive discharge and confinement at hard labor. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the .. existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2640-13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 February 2014. Documentary material considered by - the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and. The Board, in its review of your entire record and application carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as your prior satisfactory...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2645-13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session; considered your application on 19 February 2014. Nonetheless, you were notified of administrative separation by reason of misconduct due to an extended period of UA+- After consulting with: legal. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2648-13
allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures» applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by — the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval _ record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2651-13
panel of the Board for Correction of Naval | Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 February 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. relief in your case because of the seriousness of your repetitive and lengthy periods of UA which resulted in your request for discharge.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2653-13
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Nevertheless, the Board found that these factors were not sufficient to warrant any change in your discharge given your record of five NJP’s and the fact that it appears you were erroneously given a general discharge after it was directed that you receive an OTH. Consequently, when...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2655-13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 April 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Subsequently, administrative separation action was initiated to separate you by reason of Misconduct due to alcohol rehabilitation failure and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2656 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 December 2013. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by HOMC Memo 1800 MMSR-5 dated 26 June 2013, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2657-13
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. You were so discharged on 21 November 1991. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2664-13
2, The Board, consisting of Mr. Bey, Mr. Grover, and Mr. Exnicios, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 28 January 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. It appears the change was never made to his report of separation and that a copy of his honorable discharge certificate was placed in his official records as result of the BRDD action. That Petitioner's naval...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2670-13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 April 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2672-13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 April 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all Material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2674-13
.Pursuant to the provisions of reference {a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to remove the Loan Repayment Program (LRP) from his enlistment guarantees. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Zsalman, and Mr. Fxniciog, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 30 September 2013 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2677-13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 April 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2678-13
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 SIN Docket No: 02678-13 12 July 2013 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Tot Secretary of the Navy Subj: aii NAVAL RECORD or =a Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and Exnicios, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 9 July 2013 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2679-13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 April 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2682-13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 April 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. At the time of your service, a conduct average of 4.0 was required for a fully honorable characterization of service.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2685-13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 April 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. You were so discharged on 21 April 1988.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2687-13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 April 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Additionally, you were counseled on more than one occasion regarding your misconduct, and warned that further misconduct could result...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2688-13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 April 2014. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board, Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2689-13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your “application on 29 January 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2690 13
BA three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 June 2014. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNP memo 5420 Ser N130C1/14U0041 dated 10 April 2014, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence ef probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2692-13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 October 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official Docket No.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR27-13
Enclosure (1) directed the Executive Director of this Board to convene a special board pursuant to the provisions of reference {a) to consider the correction of the military service records of those officers who were retired as a result of the Fiscal Year (FY) 2009 United States Marine Corps Reserve (USMCR) Colonel Selective Retention Board (SRB). The Board, acting as a special board, consisting of Ms. Trucce and Messrs. Chapman and Vogt, reviewed Subject’s case on 15 February 2013 and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2703 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 January 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2708 13
A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 January 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2712-13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 January 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in Support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Finally, the Board believed that you were fortunate to receive a general discharge since a separation under other than honorable conditions is...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2713-13
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S,. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, an enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that her naval record be corrected by removing any and all derogatory material regarding the nonjudicial punishment (NJP) imposed on 27 July 2005 from her official military personnel file (OMPF). e. An advisory opinion received from the Marine Corps regarding Petitioner's request...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2714-13
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S$. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that the other than honorable (OTH} characterization of his discharge on 9 April 1954 be changed. He stated in part, that the automobile accident was intentional, he wanted to kill himself and get away from the Marine Corps.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2716 13
Pursuant to the provisions of reference {a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the fitness report for 1 January to 20 February 2007 (copy at Tab A) and all documentation of his relief for cause (RFC) from duty as a canvassing recruiter (copy at Tab B). The Board, consisting of Messrs. Bey, Chapman and Green, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2728-13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 January 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2730-13
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 23 October 1973, you were discharged with a general characterization of service. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2731-13
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, “regulations, and policies. an uncharacterized entry level separation by reason of fraudulent enlistment. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official “Naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2734-13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 February 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application,. together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2737 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 May 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2746-13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 February 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2754-13
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies, After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or . Nevertheless, the Board found that these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2755-13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 February 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2766-13
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 7a ©. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to an Enlistment Bonus for Source Rate (EBSR) for $15,000. CONCLUSION Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2776 13
Pursuant to the provisions of reference {a) Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he was entitled to Basic Allowance for Housing (BAH) at_ “with dependents” at dependents location in (zipcode: a for the period of to 2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Ruskin and George reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 10 March 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2777 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting-in executive session, considered your application on 30 June 2014. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNRC Memo 1133 Ser N3 of 14 Apr 14, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, *the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2793 13
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 §. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to adjust Petitioner's retired pay. wee ani, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record, Documentary material considered by the Board...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2794-13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 February 2014. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2796 13
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 5. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 January 2014. In addition, that the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) awarded you a disability rating for anxiety almost forty years after you were discharged from the Navy was not considered probative of error or injustice in your naval record because the VA acted without regard to the issue...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2798-13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your - application on’ 12 February 2014. in the record that such problems, if they existed at the time of #our service, were so serious as to excuse you of responsibility: | for your actions or were sufficiently mitigating to warrant recharacterization. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2801-13
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. You were discharged under honorable conditions based on your conduct mark average. At the time of your service, a conduct average of 4.0 was required for a fully honorable characterization of service.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2802-13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval © Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 February 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in Support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, — regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2807-13
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 $. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval ‘Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 February 2014. Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in Support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.