Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2678-13
Original file (NR2678-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 SIN

Docket No: 02678-13
12 July 2013

 

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records

 

Tot Secretary of the Navy
Subj: aii NAVAL RECORD or =a

Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. 1552
(b) 10 U.S.G. 654 (Repeal)

 

Fncl: (1) DD Form 149 with attachments
(2) Case summary
(3) Subject's naval record

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a
former enlisted member of the Navy, Filed enclosure (1) with this
Board requesting, in effect, that his undesirable discharge be
changed to honorable per reference (b). He also impliedly
requested that his narrative reason for separation be
“Secretarial Authority” and that his RE-4 (not recommended for
retention) reenlistment code be changed.

2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and
Exnicios, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and
injustice on 9 July 2013 and, pursuant to its regulations,
determined that the corrective action indicated below should be
taken on the available evidence of record. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval

records, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining
to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice finds as
follows:

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and

regulations within the Department of the Navy.

b. Petitioner enlisted in the Navy and began a period of
active duty on 28 June 1965. On 12 September 1967, he made a
sworn statement admitting to being a homosexual and participating
in such acts. Subsequently, he was administratively processed
for separation for the good of the service to avoid trial by
court-martial by reason of homosexuality. His commanding officer
forwarded his case and the separation authority directed an

undesirable discharge. He was so discharged on 20 November 1967.
c. Reference (b) sets forth the Department of the Navy's
current policies, standards, and procedures for correction of
military records following the “don't ask, don’t tell” (DADT)
repeal of 10 U.S.C. 654. It provides service Discharge Review
Boards with the authority to grant requests to change the
narrative reason for discharge to “secretarial authority”, to
re-characterize the discharge to general or honorable and/or
request to change the reenlistment code to an immediately
eligible to reenter category of “RE-1id”, when the original
discharge was based solely on DADT or a similar policy in place
prior to enactment of it and there are no aggravating factors in
the record, such as misconduct.

 

d. Characterization of service is based in part on conduct
marks assigned on a periodic basis. His conduct average was Siena
At the time of his service, a conduct average of 3.0 was required

for a fully honorable characterization of service.
CONCLUSION:

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
especially in light of reference (bo), the Board concludes that
Petitioner's request warrants favorable action in the form of
relief.

The Board concludes that based upon his record of service, the
fact that there were no aggravating factors or misconduct that
resulted in his discharge, that he attained the required average
in conduct, and current policy as established in reference (b),
that relief in the form of his characterization of service be
changed to honorable, narrative reason for separation be changed
to “Secretarial Authority”, and reenlistment code to RE-1lJ. In
view of the above, the Board Girects the following corrective
action.

 

 

RECOMMENDATION :

a. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that
he received an honorable discharge vice undesirable discharge on
20 November 1967, that the narrative reason for separation was
“Secretarial Authority”, and reenlistment code was RE-1J. it is
also directed that he be issued a new Certificate of Release or
Discharge from Active Duty (DD Form 214).

 

b. That a copy of this report of proceedings be filed in
Petitioner's naval record.

c. That, upon request, the Department of Veterans Affairs be
informed that Petitioner's application was received by the Board
on 4 March 2013.
4. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the

Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal
Regulations, Section 723.6(c) it is certified that a quorum was
present at the Board’s review and deliberations, and that the

foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board’s
proceedings in the above entitled matter.

Crome Dogar

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN BRIAN J. GEORGE
Recorder Acting Recorder

 

 

5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section
6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulation, Section 723.6(@e))
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the
authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on

behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.

{
W. Sow: R
.B

Executive dir

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR304 13

    Original file (NR304 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 SJN Docket No: 00304-13 24 October 2013 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW NAVAL RECORD OF’ Ref: fa) 10 U.8

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7180 14_Redacted

    Original file (NR7180 14_Redacted.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 MTN Docket No: 7180-14 21 July 2015 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy AXK-XX Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. In this regard, the Board notes Petitioner’s overall record of military service, conduct average, and current Department of the Navy policy as established in reference (b), that relief in the form of her characterization of service...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3249-13

    Original file (NR3249-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY - BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701.5. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his other than honorable (OTH) discharge issued on 10 April 1968 be upgraded to an honorable discharge. That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected to show that the narrative reason for separation was “Secretarial Authority” vice “Unfitness”, and that he was issued...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5406 13

    Original file (NR5406 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Dixit and Zsalman, and Ms. Davis, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 17 June 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Although the Board recognizes Petitioner's participation in homosexual activities occurred aboard ship, and as such is an aggravating factor, it...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR739 14

    Original file (NR739 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    a DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY. T, J\/REED Recorder 5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3106 13

    Original file (NR3106 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    However, the Majority is willing to overlook the aggravating factors of the acts, and given his conduct average of 3.5, the majority concludes that a general characterization of service is 2 warranted. The majority concludes that based upon the Navy’s policy as established in reference (c), that relief in the form of his narrative reason for separation be changed to Secretarial Authority. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that on 5 February 1960, he was issued a general...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR7164 13

    Original file (NR7164 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his reason and authority for separation (unfitness ~ homosexual acts) be changed. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Bey, Boyd, and Zsalman, ‘reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 29 July 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the limited corrective action indicated below should be taken on...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 06537-12

    Original file (06537-12.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his characterization of service “conditions other than honorable” be changed per reference (b). The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and Exnicios, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 3 July 2012 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the limited corrective action indicated...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1207 14

    Original file (NR1207 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with-this Board requesting, in effect, that his “GENERAL UNDER HONORBLE - CONDITIONS” characterization of service be changed per reference (b). The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman and Exnicios and Ms. Montgomery, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 9 April 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 03294-12

    Original file (03294-12.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Zsalman, and Mr. Exnicios, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 21 February 2013 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the limited corrective action indicated below Should be taken on the available evidence of record. The discharge authority approved and directed an UD discharge due to unfitness (homosexuality). CONCLUSION: Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record the Board concludes that...