Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2731-13
Original file (NR2731-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2480

TAL
Docket No: 2731-13
27 February 2014

' This is in reference to your application for correction of your
'-naval record pursuant to the provisions of biel 10 of the
. United States Code, section +85

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval

Records, sitting in executive session, considered your

application on 5 February 2014. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this

Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted

of your application, together with all material submitted in

support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes,
“regulations, and policies.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient

to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. “3

- You enlisted in the Navy and began. a period of active duty on
'-. 16 January 1990 at age 20. On 22 February 1990, you were the

subject of a-mental health evaluation, where you stated in part
that you wanted out of the Navy due to feeling stressed because
of sexual desire, and that you felt you were a homosexual. You

_ stated you had three homosexual experiences in “the months prior -

to enlisting. It was further determined that you failed to ;
disclose this information during your recruiting process. As a

_-. result of your failure to disclose this information, your

commanding officer initiated administrative discharge action by
reason of fraudulent entry as evidenced by your concealment of

- pre-service participation in homosexual acts. The separation |

authority directed. an uncharacterized entry level separation by
reason of fraudulent enlistment. You were so discharged on
12 March 1990.
The Board, in its review of your entire record and application,
carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as.
your youth. ‘However, the Board found that these factors were
not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge
given the fact that you failed to disclose your pre-service
homosexual acts. Finally, when an individual is separated by
reason.of fraudulent enlistment during the first 180 days of
active service, the individual receives an uncharacterized entry

. evel separation... Accordingly, your application has been

denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be
furnished upon request.

Tt is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and

Material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that

a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official

“Naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the

existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
_ Acting Executive Director

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR6124 13

    Original file (NR6124 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 July 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 02623-09

    Original file (02623-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 06477-07

    Original file (06477-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 May 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. As a result of concealing your pre-service homosexual activities, you were notified of pending administrative separation action by reason of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03919-02

    Original file (03919-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 December 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. You were then notified of pending administrative separation action by reason of misconduct due to fraudulent enlistment as evidenced by your failure to disclose your participation in service homosexual acts and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0257 14

    Original file (NR0257 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 July 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 12864-09

    Original file (12864-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 September 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0669 14

    Original file (NR0669 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 May 2014. However, the Board found those factors were insufficient to warrant any change in your reentry code, given your diagnosed condition, record of fraudulent entry and non- recommendation for retention. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 05089-10

    Original file (05089-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 March 2011. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Subsequently, administrative discharge action was initiated to separate you by reason of fraudulent entry as evidenced by your concealment of your pre-service...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 04617-04

    Original file (04617-04.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful andconscientious conserdation of theentire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice YouenlistedtheMarine Corps on 5 July 1968 at age 17. Additionally, on 28 October 1968, during a physical...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2444-13

    Original file (NR2444-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 February 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. The Board found that by review of your Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty (DD Form 214), it appears that medical personnel...