NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2022-13
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Hind BF GRRL poi Toren MS Se ISTE pe sted Ce See et | ie ee et Pe ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 DIC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show enrollment in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) and timely written request for conversion from spouse and child to former...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2026-13
~ A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your te application on 29 January 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In its review of your application the Board carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as your youth and overall record of service...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2033 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 June 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. ,consequently, when applying for a correction of an official ‘naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2060-13
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 TAL Docket No: 2060-13 320 January 2014 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records TO: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF 9m Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that the general characterization of her discharge be...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2062-13
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show restoration of accrual leave. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Zsalman, and Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 23 September 2013 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2064 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 June 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted is support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2069 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 May 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2084-13
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted ‘of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNPC Memo 1780 PERS-314 dtd 2 May 13, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2087-13
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 704 S, COURTHOUSE ROAD, Suite 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204 JET Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record 2. CONCLUSION Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR21 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 September 2013. After waiving your procedural right to consult with legal counsel and to present your case to an administrative discharge board (ADB), on 2 April 1986 your commanding officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to frequent involvement of a discreditable nature with military authorities and drug...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR21-13
(RASL) through his Mandatory Removal Date (MRD) of 1 September 2011 as foliows: {a) Appropriate membership points, (b) 85 non-paid inactive duty points and (c) 21 non-paid active duty points; (2) Remove from his Official Military Personnel File {(OMPF) all documents related to the FY 09 SRB; (3) Update his retirement date to reflect his MRD of 1 September | 2011 and (4) Update his separation code to read voluntary retirement. That Subject's naval record be corrected as follows: (1} Show. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2107-13
30 Sep 13 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: ‘Secretary of the Navy Subj: Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference {a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to an Enlistment Bonus for Source Rate (EBSR). The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Zsalman, and Mr. Exnicios, reviewed Petitioner's allegations...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2117-13
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 §. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that the Petitioner elected the threshold amount of spouse category Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Zsalman, and Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2131-13
record 1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference {a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was entitled to payment of Involuntary Separation Pay (ISP) when she was discharged. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Zsalman, and Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 23 September 2013 and, pursuant to its regulations,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2132-13
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Subject changed his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) election from spouse to former spouse within one year of his divorce on 1 September 2005. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman and George reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 20 August 2013 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2151-13
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. On 29 July 1970, you submitted a written request for a good of the service discharge in order to avoid trial by court-martial for two periods of UA totaling 181 days. Your request for discharge was granted and on 11 August 1970, you received an undesirable discharge for the good of the service in lieu...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2152 13
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by OCNO Memo 7220 Ser Ni30C/130U1037 dtated We. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2197-13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your: application on 11 October 2013. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by HOMC Memo 1560 MFR-1 dtd 7 May 13, a copy of which is attached. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2217 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 November 2013. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2220 13
2220-13 becember i6, Z0i5 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted OF of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2223 13
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted is Support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. After careful and conscienticus consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2238-13
A three-member panel of the Board Records, sitting in executive sess application on 11 February 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2239-13
Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board, Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by HQMC Memo 1560 MFR-1 dtd 21 May 13, a copy of which is attached. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2250-13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 February 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Subsequently, you were notified of pending administrative separation action by reason of ‘unsuitability due to the diagnosed personality disorder.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2261 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 November 2013. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of: probable material error or ‘injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2265-13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your . Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Subsequently, administrative discharge action was initiated by reason of misconduct due to wrongful drug use.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2288 13
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 5 COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490 BAN Docket No.NRO2288-13 4 December 2013 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) Navy Personnel Command/Survivor Benefit Plan Program Manager Casualty Assistance (PERS-13} memo of ‘Meath Certificate in case of ay
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR23-13
Enclosure (1) directed the Executive Director of this Board to convene a special board pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) to consider the correction of the military service records of those a officers who were retired as a result of the Fiscal Year (FY) 2009 United States Marine Corps Reserve (USMCR) Colonel Selective Retention Board (SRB). The Board, acting as a special board, consisting of Ms. Trucco and Messrs. Chapman and Vogt, reviewed Subject’s case on 15 February 2013 and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2316-13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 September 2013. Before any candidate may be advanced, the candidate must have the favorable recommendation of their commanding officer. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2321-13
of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 January 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in -support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, thé burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2322 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 November 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2323-13
NR2323-13 28 June 2013 From: ‘Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records TS: Secretary of the Navy Subj : ae REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a} 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the date of rank on his commission as a lieutenant junior grade, Chaplain Corps, U. S.' Navy as 1 December 2010, rather than 1...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2327-13
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 8. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner retained the permanent rank of E-6/ET1 while in the Naval Reserve with an effective date of 23 May 1980. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2329-13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 October 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2331-13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your | application on 29 January 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Further, the Board concluded that you received the benefit of your bargain with the Marine Corps when your request for discharge was granted...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2333 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 December 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, whéH applying for a correction of an official “naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2338-13
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to receive Special Duty Assignment Pay (SDAP) from QP to 2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, George and Ruskin reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the partial corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2342-13
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. On 6 November 2008, you received the OTH discharge for misconduct.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2343-13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 January 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2348-13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, gitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 September 2013. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC Memo 1160 Ser 811/129 dated 1 May 2013, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2350 13
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. After’ careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence “of probable material error or ATMSELCE: 2 = 3 The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy Reserve on 16 November 1994. Consequently,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2363-13
Pursuant to the provisions of reference {a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable navai record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “B” Selective Reenlistment Bonus {SRB) . The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Zealman, and Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 23 September 2013 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2367 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 November 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when Docket No.NRO2367-15 applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2373 13
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board also considered your letter dated 5 July 2013. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2385-13
The Board, consisting of Messrs. Gorenflo, Pfeiffer, and Green, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 2 May 2013 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Although the Board notes his NJP and does not condone misconduct, it finds that the NJP was solely based on inaccurate facts and a clear miscommunication. That Petitioner be restored to E-6/PS1 and retain his original...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2386 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 June 2014. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNP memo 7220 Ser N130C/13U0912 dated 16 October 2013, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2395-13
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 8. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was entitled to payment of Involuntary Separation Pay (ISP) when he was discharged. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Zsalman, and Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2400 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 December 2013. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC Memo 1780 PERS-312 dated 1 September 2013, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2405-13
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2411 13
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS: 701 §. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner did not have a break in service while on Active Duty for Special Work (ADSW) from 30 September 2012 to 11 November 2012. ROBERT D. ZSALMAN BRONTE I. MONTGOME Recorder Acting Recorder Bs Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in...