Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2250-13
Original file (NR2250-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
7ot S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490

 

' SGN
Docket No: 02250-13
12 February 2014

This is in reference to your application for correction of your

naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10 of the United
States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 11 February 2014. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations,
and policies. °

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient
to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice.

You enlisted in. the Navy and began a period of active duty on

20 June 1975. The Board found that on 2 December 1975, you
received nonjudicial punishment (NUP) for assault. On 15 January
1976, you received a second NUP for 20 days of unauthorized
absence (UA) and missing ship's movement. On 30 January 1976,
you were the subject of a psychiatric evaluation that diagnosed
you with an immature personality disorder that had existed prior
to your entry into the service. The report stated, in part, that
you had a longstanding diagnosed character disorder that did not
require psychiatric hospitalization or outpatient treatment in a
military setting. It was recommended that you be
administratively separated. Subsequently, you were notified of
pending administrative separation action by reason of
‘unsuitability due to the diagnosed personality disorder. You
were afforded all of your procedural rights including the
opportunity to submit a statement on your behalf. Your case was
forwarded and it was directed that you be separated due to
unsuitability with a general discharge. You were so discharged
on 12 February 1976,
Characterization of service is based in part on conduct marks
assigned on a periodic basis. Your conduct average was 2.0. At
the.time of your service, a conduct average of 3.0 was required
for a fully honorable characterization of service when being ~
discharged due to convenience of the government.

' The Board, in its review of your application, carefully weighed

all potentially mitigating factors, such as your youth, record of

“service and desire to upgrade your discharge. Nevertheless, the

Board found that these factors were not sufficient to warrant a
change in your. characterization of service given your two NUJP's
for serious offenses and failure to attain the required average
in conduct. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The
names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished
upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.

ee aN

ROBERT D. SG ALMAN

Acting Executive Director

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 10748-09

    Original file (10748-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 August 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Nevertheless, the Board ,sconcluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant "recharacterization of your general discharge because of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4927 13

    Original file (NR4927 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 May 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 18 January 1980, you received the general discharge (unsuitability-personality disorder), and were assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06503-09

    Original file (06503-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. However, this recommendation was changed to general under honorable conditions by reason of unsuitability solely because of your psychiatric diagnosis of a character disorder. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3862-13

    Original file (NR3862-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 March 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, ‘regulations, and policies. Nevertheless, the Board found that these factors were not sufficient to warrant a change in your characterization of service given the seriousness...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06514-08

    Original file (06514-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 May 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all Material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your general discharge because of your...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05469-06

    Original file (05469-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.•You enlisted in the Navy on 19 September 1974 at age 18. Subsequently, the discharge authority...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06054-08

    Original file (06054-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. The evaluation concluded by recommending discharge due to your diagnosed personality disorder. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 12520 11

    Original file (12520 11.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 October 2012. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10235-07

    Original file (10235-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 June 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 5 March 1976, your commanding officer initiated administrative separation processing under the Marine Corps ' expeditious discharge program, and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06912-08

    Original file (06912-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 22 December 1976, you received a general discharge based on your average conduct marks. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.