NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4815 13
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 §. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to issue an immediate reenlistment contract. Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4816 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 April 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4819 13
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your’ naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. in addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by HOMC Memo 1560 MFR-1 dtd 29 Aug 13, a copy of which is attached. Thus, your request for a personal appearance has been denied.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4821-13
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC Memo 7200 Ser 8353/023 dated a. a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying fora correction of an official naval record, the burden is -on the applicant ‘to demonstrate the existence of probable material _...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4823-13
The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Exnicios and George reviewed Petitioner’ s allegations of error and injustice on 24 February 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective. The Board,. Petitioner’s naval record.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4825 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 October 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error OF injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4829-13
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 $, COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1004 ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490 BAN Docket :NRO04829-13 30 September 2013 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to H-8/ETCS with an...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4830 13
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, chat the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he receive credit for his Public and Community Service (PACS) towards retirement at age 62. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Exnicios and Ruskin reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 5 May 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4845 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 February 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4846-13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 September 2013. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman and Exnicios reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 30 September 2013 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office “having...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4848 13
You may apply to the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) for a possible change. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. However, the Board concluded that your reentry code should not be changed because of your diagnosed sleepwalking disorder.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4852 13
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 8 COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1004 ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490 BAN Docket No.NR04852-13 2 December 2013 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Ref: {a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner submitted a timely written request for Reserve...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4860-13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive. ‘Documentary : material considered by the Board consisted of your application, tegether with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4869 13
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 704 &, COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1901 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 DIC Docket No. 1552 (1) DD Form 149 wfattachments (2) NPC Memo dtd 30 Sep 13 (3) Subject’s naval record Enel: ovisions of reference filed enclosure the applicable nav ollment in the Survivor Bene (1) with this Board al record be corrected fit Plan 4, Pursuant to the pr referred to as Petitioner, requesting, in effect, that ‘tioner declined enr 2. The Board, consistin...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4871 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 November 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4874 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 November 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4883 13
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4892 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 April 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. During this period of UA you were also declared a deserter, however, the record does not reflect the disciplinary action taken for this 36 day...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4896 13
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. As a result, on 16 January 1992, you submitted a written request for an other than honorable discharge in order to avoid trial by court-martial for the foregoing periods of UA totalling 74 days and two specifications of missing ship's movement. Consequently, when applying for a correction...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4902 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 April 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4903 13
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all Material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 13 July 1993 the discharge authority approved: this’ recommendation and directed separation under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct, and on 16 July 1993 you were so discharged. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4905 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 April 2014. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4906 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 April 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 11 February 1994 an ADB recommended separation under honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to commission of a serious offense.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4909 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 April 2014. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all Material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR491 13
Documentary material considered by the Boa consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your neve record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. You were discharged from the Navy Reserve on 1 March 1971 by reason of being not physically...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4913 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, reconsidered your application on 23 April 2014. In this regard, the Board concluded that there was no evidence in the record to support reinstating you to paygrade E-6, and in the absence of such evidence, and because you accepted NUP, the Board concluded that your commanding officer’s decision to impose it, and the punishment imposed, were appropriate. Consequently, “when applying for a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4917 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 April 2014. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4918 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 January 2014. Your record shows you were discharged from active duty on 22 May 2007, and enlisted in the Navy Reserve on 24 May 2007. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4919-13
Board for. Under the rules governing this Board, an application for a correction of a naval record must be made within three years after the discovery of the alleged error. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4925 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 April 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4927 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 May 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 18 January 1980, you received the general discharge (unsuitability-personality disorder), and were assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4928 13
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all Material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. As a result, you were notified of pending administrative discharge processing with an other than honorable (OTH) discharge due to homosexuality. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, tthe burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4929 13
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 DIC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to credit back of annual leave erroneously charged. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Zsalman, and Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4931-13
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to adjust reserve appointment date. The Board, consisting of Mr. Zsalman, Mr. George, and Mr. Exnicios, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 24 February 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4937 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 January 2014. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4939 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 June 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4960-13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 August 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicabie statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when’ applying for a correction of an | official naval record, the burden is’on the ‘applicant .
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4962 13
‘The Board, having reviewed all the facts. of his physical condition and that the proper course of action is to change his reentry code from RE-4 to a waivable _ RE-3P. naval record be further corrected by changing his separation code from HSG1 to JEFF.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR497 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 October 2013. After waiving your procedural right to consult with legal counsel and to present your case to an administrative discharge board (ADB), your commanding officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to frequent involvement of a discreditable nature with military authorities and drug abuse. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4972 13
COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1601 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 JBH Docket No. NR4972-13 25 March 2014 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy ——: b. 25 March 2014 pe ‘eee ROBERT D. ZSALMAN Acting Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4974 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 May 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4975 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 May 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4979 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 May 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. You were notified of pending administrative discharge processing with an other than honorable (OTH) discharge due to misconduct (drug abuse).
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4986-13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 January 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. As a result of this action, you were spared the stigma of a court-martial conviction and the potential penalties of a punitive discharge...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4990 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive, session, considered your application on 7 May 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4992 13
A three-member panel’ of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 May 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Nevertheless, the Board found that these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given the seriousness of your...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4993 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 May 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4994 13
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 TAL Docket No: 4994-13 30 May 2014 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10, United States Code, section 1552. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 May 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4998-13
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, an enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his naval record be corrected by. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by removing and/or totally obliterating all references regarding the NJP of 25 September 2002, to include, but not limited to the UPB, the two page 11 entries, and all references to the NJP and _nonrecommendation for promotion. any and all materials or entries...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4999-13
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to retroactive Medical Incentive Special Pay (ISP) from 1 October 2010 through 30 September 2011 in the amount of $20,000 for an Internal Medicine Physician. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 16 September 2013 and,...