DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
_ BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 $. COURTHOUSE ROAD
ARLINGTON, VA 22204
' JBH
Docket No. NR4821-13
24 Feb 14
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval
“record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
sitting in executive session, considered your application on
24 February 2014. Your allegations of error and injustice were
reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures
_ applicable to the proceedings of this Board. . Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with
all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board
considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC Memo 7200 Ser
8353/023 dated a. a copy of which is attached.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record,
the Board found that the evidence gubmitted was insufficient to
establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In
this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments
contained in the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has
- been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be
- furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such. that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board
reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence
or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this
regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of
regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when
applying fora correction of an official naval record, the burden is
-on the applicant ‘to demonstrate the existence of probable material
_ error or injustice. — .
Sincerely,
“ ROBERT D. ALMAN
Acting Executive Director
Enclosure: NPC Memo 7200 Ser 8353/023 dated nn
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2481 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 November 2014. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 05323-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 October 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05942-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 September 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR777 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 September 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. However, after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 08353-98
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 May 1999. were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. opinion furnished by NPC letter 1000 attached. Records show that you entered the United States on 1980 in Honolulu, Hawaii, from March 1980 till the time you reported for active duty.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5701 13
Jn your case, the Board agreed with the advisory opinions that, because you did not gain and maintain proficiency in the community and for the NEC that you received the bonus, in the Board’s view, recoupment of the unearned portion of the bonus was appropriate. After reviewing all the circumstances in your case, in the Board’s view, the decision to recoup the unearned portion of the bonus was just, and the half separation pay you received was properly awarded according the Separation...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7816 14
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memo 1430 Ser 8112/0033 dated 26 January 2015, a copy of which is attached. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in your case. NR7816-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 05210-12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 September 2012. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC Memo 1160 Ser 811/200 dated 6 June 2012, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 05375-12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 September 2012. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC Memo 1160 Ser 811/215 dated 11 June 2012, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2348-13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, gitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 September 2013. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC Memo 1160 Ser 811/129 dated 1 May 2013, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.