NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05315-08
You enlisted in the Navy on 16 July 1979 at age 17 and served for nearly a year without disciplinary incident, but on 11 July 1980 you received nonjudicial punishment (NUP) for wrongful use of Marijuana. The punishment imposed was a $500 forfeiture of pay. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05316-08
In response to a request from the Board, you stated that you do not have the DD Form 214 showing the separation and reenlistment code. As indicated in the enclosure, NPC states that you were assigned the correct separation and reenlistment codes. NPC also states that the amount of separation pay entered on your DD Form 214 appears to be correct.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05317-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 July 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in ‘Support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05323-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 December 2008. However, there is no evidence that you took the examination for advancement, that you were selected for advancement based on the results of that examination or that you were ever actually advanced before your release from active duty in 1952. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05328-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 July 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05333-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 31 July 2008. your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all Material submitted in Support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05334-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 August 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05341-08
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board did not consider whether your characterization of service or reason for separation should be changed, since you have not exhausted your administrative remedies by applying to the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB). Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05342-08
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 DIC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB). The Board, consisting of Mr. Zsalman, Mr. Pfeiffer, and Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05347-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 October 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in Support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05348-08
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-5 from the March 2007 Navy- wide advancement exam. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 28 July 2008 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05352-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 April 2009. for breaking restriction, two specifications of wrongful use of Marijuana, and the foregoing period of UA totalling 164 days. discharge.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05353-08
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all Material submitted in Support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. [In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 29 May 2008, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05358-08
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his reenlistment code be changed. Documentary material considered -by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by changing the RE-4 reenlistment code, assigned on 3 June 2005, to RE-6.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05359-08
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board found that you served on active duty in the Marine Corps from 11 December 1974 to 15 July 1975, when you were discharged by reason of unsuitability due to a personality disorder, a condition that is not considered to be a disability under the laws administered by the Department of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05363-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 August 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05364-08
It is noted that the Commandant of the Marine Corps (CMC) has directed modifying the contested fitness report for 13 August 2004 to 31 March 2005 by deleting the following from section K.4 (reviewing officer's comments): “He ranks 15 out of 15 for all sergeants I reviewed this reporting period.” A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 June 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05369-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 April 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05372-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 August 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for the use by the Board for correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05373-08
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that she enlisted in paygrade E-3, vice E-1, based on college credits earned in foreign institutions prior to her enlistment. The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 28 July 2008 and, pursuant to its...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05377-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 September 2008. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memorandums 7220 N130C3/08U0636 and7220 N130C3/08U0638 of 4 September 2008, a copy each is attached. N130C recommends disapproval of the petitioner’s request to draw BAH at the with-dependent rate for the time period of 1 Mar 96 to 23 Apr 02. jrye Sud D. Silva Assistant, Pay...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05380-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 April 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05390-08
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 JRE Docket No. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 September 2008. your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05391-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 January 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board found that these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your record of misconduct and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05392-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application.on 7 April 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 25 April 1988 your commanding officer recommended an other than honorable discharge by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05400-08
Reference (b) authorizes an RE-1 reenlistment code for a Sailor, such as Petitioner, who was recommended for advancement and retention at the time of his/her release from active duty. The Board believes that the RE-4 reenlistment code assigned at the time of Petitioner’s release from active duty was an error and that the nonrecommendation for reenlistment at the time of her discharge was based solely on this error. That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected to show that she was...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05401-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 June 2009. Documentary evidence considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05402-08
A wanee-menber panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 April 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 25 September 1985 an ADB recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05405-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 April 2009. - After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05407-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 April 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05418-08
Concerning your objection that your promotion was delayed beyond 90 days after final action in your criminal case, the Board noted that the delay of your promotion was not based solely on the proceedings in state court, but also on the disposition of your case by military authorities. Even if the six-month provision of SECNAVINST 1412.9B is considered applicable to the delay in your case, the Board noted that on 12 October 2005, before your promotion had been delayed for six months,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05421-08
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 BAN Docket No. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 11 August 2008 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6 (e) of the revised Procedures of the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05422-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 March 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05426-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 June 2008. On 18 July 2007 you received an entry level separation by reason of your failure to meet medical/physical procurement standards and were assigned a reentry code of RE-4. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05443-08
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 LCC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was entitled to full separation pay when he was discharged from the Navy. The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05444-08
Petitioner, a , filed an application that his record be 2. That Petitioner record be corrected to show that he transferred to the Retired Reserve effective on 1 August 2004, in the grade of GySgt vice the discharge of 13 August 2004 now of record. c. That this Report of Proceedings be filed in Petitioner's naval record.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05446-08
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 BAN Docket No. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 4 August 2008 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6 (e) of the revised Procedures of the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05450-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 October 2008. That board found that there was insufficient evidence to show any error or injustice in the discharge examination. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05452-08
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05455-08
A three-member panel of the - ‘Board for Correction’ of Naval. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05458-08
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 13 ("Administrative Remarks") entry dated 27 March 2001 (copy at Tab A). The Board, consisting of Ms. Wilcher and Messrs. Cooper and Sproul, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 21 August 2008, and pursuant to its regulations,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05459-08
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 DIC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the petitioner reenlisted USNR vice USN. The Board, consisting of Mr. Zsalman, Mr. Pfeiffer, and Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05463-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 January 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicabl statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05465-08
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH Docket No. 5465-08 14 Oct 08 Dear
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05471-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 May 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05474-08
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH Docket No. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 October 2008. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05481-08
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner applied to this Board requesting his naval record be corrected by changing the reentry code he was assigned on 21 November 2007. ~The Board, consisting of Messrs. [ime “ilies 33° Wate = xceviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 10 September 2008 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. b. Applicable directives...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05482-08
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Subject had no eligible beneficiaries at the time of his retirement for enrollment in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 25 August 2008 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05487-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 September 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable Statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05488-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 July 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...