DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
TRG
Docket No: 5316-08
9 February 2009
This is in reference to your application, DD Form 149, dated
14 May 2008.
A review of your record reveals that most of the documentation
from your second enlistment including the long copy of the DD
Form 214 and your last performance evaluations are not filed in
your digital record. This may have happened because your field
record was never sent to the Navy Personnel Command (NPC) from
the command from which you were discharged. The available record
shows that you were charged with a period of unauthorized absence
and received nonjudicial punishment for another offense. Because
of the absence of records, the Board cannot verify the actual
reenlistment code you were assigned at the time of your discharge
on 17 March 2006. In response to a request from the Board, you
stated that you do not have the DD Form 214 showing the
separation and reenlistment code.
As indicated in the enclosure, NPC states that you were assigned
the correct separation and reenlistment codes. NPC also states
that your reenlistment code is RE-6 and that you should be able
to seek reenlistment with another branch of the service. An RE-6
reenlistment code is authorized when an individual is ineligible
or denied reenlistment because of high year tenure (HYT). Since
you had completed eight years of service and were still serving
in paygrade E-4 it appears that you did not meet the HYT
requirement. NPC also states that the amount of separation pay
entered on your DD Form 214 appears to be correct.
Since no other information is available, the Board assumes that
the conclusion of NPC that you were assigned an RE-6 reenlistment
code is correct. Further, there is no documentation to support
your contention that the amount of separation pay you received is
incorrect. Therefore, action by the Board to correct an RE-4
reenlistment code or to take action concerning separation pay is
not warranted and your case is hereby administratively closed
without action. -
Sincerely,
\ Weak
W. DEHAN PERT
Ixecutive Diweo
Enclosure
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00825-01
A three-member panel for the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 June 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01352-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 October 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code when an individual is denied reenlistment due to HYT because he is serving in pay grade E-2. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07845-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you enlisted in the Naval Reserve on 20 October 1977 at age 20, and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04348-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 August 2001. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. HYT action until 31 December 1999. serbice, SK2 years of separation pay even i If eligible for RTB, SK2 retired pay at age 60.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00968-01
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAb’AL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 ELP Docket No. 968-01 14 June 2001 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the States Code, Section 1552. provisio,ns of Title 10, United A three-member panel for the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 June 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05106-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 November 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Bpard consisted Board. Reenlistment beyond the HYT limit of 10 years was not authorized and assignment of an RE-6 reenlistment code was required. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5936 14
Petitioner claims that “ I reviewed the message about SDIP and found that I still qualify since I am not getting paid (Frocked) for E-6 and because of my promotion I can fulfill my orders and complete the minimum requirement of 24 months to be able to receive SDIP.” However, enclosure (1) is the only documentary evidence Petitioner submitted to support his claim of why he felt he was eligible for the SDIP. By the time Petitioner’s HYT was approved and he found out his HYT would only have...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06890-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 October 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. The following day, your counsel responded that any Your counsel On 23 February 1998, the secretarial designee directed that your records be corrected to show that you were involuntarily discharged on 13 December 1995 by...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06751-00
C. Petitioner reenlisted in the Navy on 31 August 1991 for six years as an EN3 (E-4). MAJORITY CONCLUSION: Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, the majority, consisting of Messrs. Lightle and Geisler, concludes In this that Petitioner's request warrants favorable action. MINORITY CONCLUSION: The minority member, Mr. Taylor, agrees with Petitioner's request should be granted by changing his reenlistment code from RE-4 to RE-6.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08177-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 March 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. You then reenlisted for six years on 9 March The record reflects that you were advanced to TM2 (E-5) on 16 January 1980 and served without incident until 6 May 1982 when you received nonjudicial punishment (NJP) for failure to...