NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08212-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.On 4 September 2002, you enlisted in the Navy at age 18. On 3 February 2003, you began another UA. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08216-07
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS2 NAVY ANNEXWASHINGTON DC 2O37O-5 100CRSDocket No: 8216-07 20 March 2008This isin reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code section 1552.A three—member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 March 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08220-07
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 TRG Docket No: 8220-07 5. May 2008 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF ‘fil Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.c. 1552 Encl: (1) Case Summary (2) Subject's naval record 1.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08230-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In your application, you are requesting that your record be corrected to show that you were discharged in June 1986 vice the discharge of 6 June 1985 now of record. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08235-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 April 2008. your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. However, several documents in the record, which were signed by you,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08237-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated 23 October 2007 with enclosure, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08238-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 January 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. On 9 July 1998, the Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces affirmed the decision of the Navy and Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals, which...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08244-07
08244-07 1 July 2008 Records, sitting in executive session, considered your Support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Accordingly, your application has been denied. the Board.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08253-07
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS2 NAVY ANNEXWASHiNGTON DC 20370-5100 TRGDocket No:8253-0714 February 2008This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code section 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 February 2008. At the time of your discharge, you had Completed two months...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08254-07
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated 15 November 2007, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.Sincerely,W. The member states the evaluation report was adverse because of his previous reporting senior contacting the reporting senior at the Transfer Personnel Unit.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08259-07
08259-07 29 July 2008This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 July 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08259-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 July 2008. The Board concluded that your receipt of a substantial disability rating from the VA is not probative of the existence of error or injustice in your naval record, because the VA assigned that rating without regard to the issue of your fitness to perform military duty at the time of your discharge. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08264-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 January 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08267-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 July 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in Support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08267-07
08267-0729July2008This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 July 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08273-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 July 2008. The Board noted that even if you had been unfit for duty, you would not have been entitled to disability separation or retirement, because your discharge by reason of misconduct would have taken precedence over disability evaluation processing. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08273-07
08273-07 24 July 2008This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 July 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08279-07
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC Memo dtd 7 Nov 07, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08289-07
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS2 NAVY ANNEXWASHINGTON DC 2O37O-5~QQJREDocket No. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08289-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 July 2008. your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08296-07
Additionally, the member requests the fitness reports be replaced with the correct original report. f. The reporting senior has submitted, and we have accepted a supplement fitness report for entry in member’s OMPF and it has been posted to member’s PSR.g. We recommend no further action be taken by the Board for Corrections of Naval Records as the member’s record has already been corrected administratively.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08297-07
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to an increased amount of Enlistment Bonus (EB) for the Nuclear Field Program. The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08297-07
8297-07 8 Sep 08From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the NavySubj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICORef: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to an increased amount of Enlistment Bonus (EB) for the Nuclear Field Program.2. Option (2) of Annex B to the DD Form 4...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08304-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC Memo dtd 13 Nov 07, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08306-07
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX TRG WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 Docket No: 8306-07 7 May 2008 naval record pursu nt to the Provisions of title 10 of the United States Code section 1552. two performance evaluations for the period 1 April 19909 to 31 March 1992 are adverse. In both evaluations there are comments concerning your poor leadership skills. After the first adverse evaluation, you were issued a letter of substandard service.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08310-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy Reserve on 16 April 1942 at age 17. Although you were recommended for an...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08310-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 July 2008. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08315-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 3 July 2007 at age 18. Subsequently, on 30 July 2007 you were discharged...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08319-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 3 June 1999 at age 18. Nevertheless, the Board found that these factors...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08319-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 July 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Nevertheless, the Board found that these factors were not sufficient to warrant a change in your reenlistment code given the diagnosed adjustment disorder.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08324-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your “application on 22 April 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. You were released from active duty on 26 November 1997 with your service characterized as honorable.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08326-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Marine Corps on 10 January 1967 at age 17. On 23 August 1969 you began another...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08333-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Marine Corps on 26 March 1976 at age 18. On 5 May 1978 you began a period of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08334-07
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the Permanent Change of Station (PCS) orders that reassigned the Petitioner from the USS Gunston Hall LSD 44 to the Naval Academy were issued prior to 19 July 2007 so she can be reimbursed for moving her household goods (HHG) and entitled to an incentive payment.2. The Board, consisting of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08336-07
The offenses you committed which resulted in this sentence are not stated. The Board found that these factors and contention were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your multiple instances of misconduct while in the Navy. There is no evidence in your Navy record and you have submitted none to show that you were mentally ill while in the Navy or if you were that it was sufficient to mitigate your misconduct.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08341-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 June 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08343-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 August 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board concluded that you were properly discharged by reason of unsuitability due to a diagnosed personality disorder with an RE-4 reenlistment...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08344-07
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100LCCDocket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was entitled to payment of one-half separation pay when he was discharged on 23 June 2007.2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Exnicios, J. Hicks, and Lippolis,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08347-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 April 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of ‘your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. ‘Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08350-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. An administrative discharge board met on 6 January 1954 and recommended an undesirable discharge. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08354-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 28 October 1953 at age 17. After review, the discharge authority...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08356-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 12 May 1972 at age 18. Those regulations also allow for the assignment...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08361-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 August 2008. You may be eligible to request recharacterization of your discharge and a change to the reason for your discharge by submitting an application to the Naval Discharge Review Board. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08366-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Marine Corps on 25 February 1981 at age 17. On 5 January 1984 you began a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08368-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 July 2008. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08368-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 16 August 1978 at age 18. Nevertheless, the Board found that these...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08369-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished, by Headquarters Marine Corps, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08370-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 4 October 1982 at age 18. On 17 July 1984, the discharge authority...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08370-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 July 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08384-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your late husband’s naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.Your late husband reenlisted in the Navy on 8 December 1982 after more than three years...