DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
JRE
Docket No. 08244-07
1 July 2008
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
Support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice. In this regard, the Board found that a
medical record entry dated 30 July 1972 shows that you sustained
head injuries on 23 July 1972 “secondary to” a fight. The Board
were attacked, beaten and knocked unconscious as you slept ina
barracks, as you allege. Accordingly, your application has been
denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be
furnished upon request.
the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official
naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
Sincerely,
Yea DFEMREE
Executive D Oo
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 01713-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 January 2010. This statement also noted that you wanted to be discharged because of your fear of flashbacks from the use of illegal drugs. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04919-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application; together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. On 9 May 1972 Commander, Submarine Force, You were honorably discharged on 23 May 1972 in the rank of STSSN. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 02500-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your ‘application on 12 January 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with ali material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, - and policies. Nevertheless, the Board found that these factors were not sufficient to warrant a change in your characterization of service given your two...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 05434-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 March 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 00417-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.On 25 March 1970 you enlisted in the Navy at age 17 with parental consent and served without incident...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06435-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 1 February 2002. Your were discharged on 27 July 1972 pursuant to the approved findings of a medical board that you failed to meet the minimum physical standards for enlistment because of the residual effects of a knee injury you sustained in January 1972, which you failed to disclose when you underwent your pre- enlistment physical examination. Consequently,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3949-13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 March 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 5 June 1973, you received the general under honorable conditions discharge for misconduct in absentia.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR6124 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 July 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 12048-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 March 2010. The Board found that contention insufficient to warrant a change in the reason for your discharge. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 06035-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 March 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...