NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 04226-07
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show enrollment in the Montgomery GI Bill (MGIB) program.2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Mann, Neuschafer, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 10 July 2007 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 04230-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 February 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in Support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 04238-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 February 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in Support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 04246-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.On 7 December 1970, you enlisted in the Marine Corps at age 17 with parental consent. Although no...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 04257-07
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was not indebted for a move he made when discharged in October 2006.2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Rothlein, and Wade, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 26 June 2007 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 04258-07
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former Sailor, filed an application with this Board requesting that his RE-4 reenlistment code be changed.2. Since the offense which led to the NJP and the adverse performance evaluation is an isolated event in an otherwise good record, the Board concludes that no useful purpose is now served by the RE-4 reenlistment code and it should be changed to an RE-i reenlistment code.The Board further concludes that this Report of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 04260-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Marine Corps on 15 September 1978 at age 18. Your offenses were seven periods...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 04261-07
Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 04265-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.The Board found that you enlisted in the Marine Corps on 25 January 1960. On 24 January 1966 you received a general discharge from the Marine Corps Reserve upon the expiration of your enlistment.Characterization of service is based, in part, on one’s conduct and proficiency averages, both of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 04269-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 10 October 1979 at age 19. Your conduct marks average was 2.7. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 04271-07
the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You were released from four years of active duty in the Marine Corps on 25 January 2002. At that time, you were assigned an RE—3P...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 04273-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in Support thereof, your naval record and applicable Statutes, regulations and policies. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion dated 4 April 2008 in finding your selection by the FY 2005 Staff Sergeant Selection Board would have been definitely unlikely, even if your record had not included the later...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 04284-07
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show enrollment in the Montgomery GI Bill (MGIB) program.2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Mann, Neuschafer, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 10 July 2007 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 04287-07
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 TRG Docket No: 4287-07 25 June 2008 ive session, considered your Your allegations of error and ordance with administrative your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Regulations require that that reason with an adverse evaluation, the Board could not find an error or injustice in your case. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 04306-07
It is noted that the Commandant of the Marine Corps (CMC) has directed correcting the contested fitness report by changing the entry in item 17.a (“Commendatory”) from “No” to “Yes.” A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 31 July 2008. The Board agreed with the advisory opinion from MMOA-4 in concluding the correction of item 17.a of the fitness report at issue would not have appreciably enhanced...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 04310-07
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 2O37O~51OOBJGDocket No:4310-0714 June 2007This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.It is noted that the Commandant of the Marine Corps (CMC) hasdirected modifying the contested fitness report for 1 April 2004to 31 March 2005 by changing the ending date, from 31 March 2005to 27 April 2005; and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 04321-07
MAJORITY CONCLUSION:Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, a majority of the Board, consisting of Ms. Ballinger and Mr. Leeman, concludes that Petitioner’s request warrants favorable action. The majority finds that and his spouse did show a desire to decline SBP prior to retirement as evidenced by the DD Form 2656 filed in July 2006.MAJORITY RECOMMENDATION:That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show that:a. The foregoing action of the Board...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 04347-07
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show enrollment in the Montgomery GI Bill (MGIB) Increased Benefit Contribution Program.2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Mann, Neuschafer, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 10 July 2007 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 04351-07
Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 04362-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your current application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, the Board’s file on your priorcase, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps dated12June 2007, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 04365-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 4 May 2007, a copy of which is attached. Per MCO 1610.llc, the Performance Evaluation Review Board, with three members present met on 2 May 2007 to consideration...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 04367-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters United States Marine Corps (MMER), a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 04391-07
04391-07 9 May 2008 A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 May 2008. The fact that the Department of Veterans Affairs assign a higher disability rating, in accordance with policies and regulations applicable to that department, is not probative of the existence of error or injustice in your naval record. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 04399-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.On 19 September 1983, you enlisted in the Navy at age 20. In connection with this processing, you...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 04411-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Additionally, the regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code when an individual is separated because of fraudulent enlistment. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 04413-07
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner applied to this Board requesting that her naval record be corrected by changing the RE-4 reentry code assigned on 11 April 2007. b. Petitioner enlisted in the Navy on 12 March 2007. Accordingly, the Board recommends that Petitioner’s reason for separation be changed to erroneous enlistment vice the reason for separation now of record.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 04414-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 February 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 04421-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 January 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 04454-07
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYBOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 JREDocket No. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 04489-07
former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with the Board requesting a change in his RE-4 reenlistment code.2. The Board, consisting of Ms., Ms., and Mr.reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 13 February 2008 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. He was discharged with an entry level separation and assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code on 19 October 2000.e.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 04501-07
The Board did not consider your request for correction of your nonjudicial punishment, as that request was previously denied, and you have not submitted any new material evidence concerning that request. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 04503-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 February 2008. You were also in a UA status during the period from 1 to 5 September 1989. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 04512-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 20 June 1962 at age 17. On 16 January 1964 your commanding officer...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 04516-07
Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 04527-07
DEPARTMENT OF THE NA VYBOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 CRSDocket No: 4527-07 21 May 2008This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code section 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 May 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board Consisted of your application,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 04533-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you enlisted in the Marine Corps on 7 December 1998. You were assigned a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 04541-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 04543-07
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he received a more favorable reentry code that RE-4. reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice ‘ on 1 May 2008, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Pursuant to the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 04549-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you reenlisted in the Marine Corps on 29 July 1960 after nearly three years of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 04558-07
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show enrollment in the Montgomery GI Bill (MGIB) program.2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Mann, Neuschafer, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 10 July 2007 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 04571-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 January 2008. The Board concluded that those factors were insufficient to warrant corrective action, given your substandard conduct and overall trait averages, and the diagnosis which resulted in your discharge. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 04573-07
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he reenlisted USN, vice USNR.2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Chapman, Mr. Pfeiffer, and Ms. Ballinger, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 14 August 2007 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 04588-07
applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 18 March 1976 at age 18. After the BCD was approved at all levels of review, on 25 November 1980 you were so discharged.The Board, in its review of your entire record and application, carefully weighed all potentially mitigating...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 04604-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Marine Corps on 23 March 2003 at age 21. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 04607-07
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100LCC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner is entitled full per diem for unavailability of meals during periods of Annual Training and Inactive Duty Training (IDTT) for 2006 and 2007.2. Petitioner must...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 04608-07
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former commissioned officer in the Navy Reserve, filed an application with this Board requesting, in effect, that his record be corrected to show that he has 20 years of qualifying service and transferred to the Retired Reserve and to the Retired List vice being discharged. c. Petitioner applied to this Board contending that there were errors in his retirement point record and if they were corrected that he would have 20 qualifying...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 04610-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 24 June 1999 at age 24. At that time you waived your right to consult...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 04616-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 8 September 1982 at age 23 and served without disciplinary incident until...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 04617-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 16 February 2005 at age 23. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 04620-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 7 February 2007 at age 21. As a result, you were processed for an...