Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 04306-07
Original file (04306-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

 

BUG
Docket No: 4306-07
2 October 2008

 

 

This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the
United States Code, section 1552.

You requested, in effect, removal of the fitness report for 12
July 1996 to 17 June 1997; removal of your assignment to weight
control from 6 June 1997 to 24 August 1998 and consideration by
a special selection board (SSB) for the Fiscal Year (FY) 2000
Lieutenant Colonel Selection Board (you were considered below
zone and not selected by the FY 1999 Lieutenant Colonel
Selection Board, but that was not considered a failure of
selection, so it could not be a basis for SSB consideration).

It is noted that the Commandant of the Marine Corps (CMC) has
directed correcting the contested fitness report by changing the
entry in item 17.a (“Commendatory”) from “No” to “Yes.”

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 31 July 2008. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
of your application, together with all material submitted in
support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the
report of the Headquarters Marine Corps (HQMC) Performance
Evaluation Review Board (PERB) dated 24 April 2007 amended as
indicated in the memorandum for the record dated 30 September
2008, and the advisory opinions from the HOMC Officer Counseling
and Evaluation Section, Personnel Management Division (MMOA- 4)
dated 27 April 2007 and the HQMC Manpower Information
Operations, Manpower Management Information Systems Division
(MIO) dated 20 September 2007, copies of which are attached.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially
concurred with the comments contained in the report of the PERB,
as amended, and the advisory opinion from MIO. In this regard,
the Board found it a harmless error that the reviewing officer's
comments, in the contested fitness report, were legibly
handwritten rather than typed as prescribed in the applicable
directive. The Board agreed with the advisory opinion from
MMOA-4 in concluding the correction of item 17.a of the fitness
report at issue would not have appreciably enhanced your
competitiveness for promotion, so your SSB consideration would
not be warranted. In view of the above, your application for
relief beyond that effected by CMC has been denied. The names
and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon
request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official
naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

aa S

W. DEAN PF F
Executive Dtinekior

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 09788-09

    Original file (09788-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    In enclosure (3), MMOA-4, the HOMC Officer Counseling and Evaluation Section, commented to the effect that Petitioner's failures of selection to lieutenant colonel should not be removed, notwithstanding the PERB action, in view of the noncompetitive cumulative relative values in his fitness reports as a major, as well as a fitness report date gap. Notwithstanding enclosure (3), the Board finds Petitioner’s failures of selection to lieutenant colonel should be removed as well. b, That his...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05329-01

    Original file (05329-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Your last request was not considered, as you have not been selected for or promoted to lieutenant colonel. directed that your Naval record will be corrected by removing therefrom the following fitness report: Having reviewed all the facts of record, the Board has Date of Report Reportin gSenio r Period of Report 11 Apr 00 There will be inserted in your Naval record a memorandum in 2. Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB) to record and e FY02 USMC remove the To He successfully...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 01582-11

    Original file (01582-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 JSR Docket No: 1582-11 10 March 2011 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Tes Secretary of the Navy ij REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: fa) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by removing...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08728-01

    Original file (08728-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The contested fitness reports were not removed until after both of Petitioner failures of selection to lieutenant colonel. ’s C. In correspondence attached as enclosure (3), the HQMC Officer Assignment Branch, Personnel Management Division (MMOA4) has commented to the effect that Petitioner request to remove his FY 2002 failure of selection has merit and warrants favorable action. z's request for de of Enclosure (2) is furnished to assist in selec By enclosure 3. with a copy of the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05326-01

    Original file (05326-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    That Petitioner ’s naval record be corrected by removing his failures by the FY 1996 and 1997 Major Selection Boards. 's record and his FY-96 and FY-97 920528. Point of contact Major, U.S. Marine Corps Head, Officer Counseling and Evaluation Section Officer Assignment Branch Personnel Management Division DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS D 3280 RUSSELL ROA QUANTICO, VIRGINIA 221 34-51 0 Y 3 IN REPLY REFER TO: 1600 MMOA-4 14 Aug 01 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 06678-06

    Original file (06678-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYBOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 2O370 -5100BJGDocket No: 6678-0617 November 2005This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.You requested removing the fitness reports for 1 June 2004 to 9 May 2005 and 9 May to 30 June 2005, as well as your failure of selection by the Fiscal Year (FY) 2007 Lieutenant Colonel Selection Board.It...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 02790-99

    Original file (02790-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    official military record, the fitness report 2. Having reviewed all the facts of record, the Board has directed that your Naval record will be corrected by removing therefrom the following fitness report: Date of Report Reportinu Senior Period of Re~ort 6 Jan 98 970701 to 971231 (TR) 2 . However, First Lieutenant record retains serious competitive concerns due to poor -istribution, less competitive Section B marks, and the Reviewing Officer's comments on the Annual fitness report of 960429...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09077-07

    Original file (09077-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    By letter dated 7 June 2005, the Commandant of the Marine Corps (CMC) recommended to the Secretary of the Navy (SECNAV) that Petitioner’s name be withheld from the FY 2006 Colonel Promotion List. This advisory stated he was withheld from the FY 2006 promotion list because of the adverse fitness report (which had not yet been removed), and that without the report, his record is “obviously competitive.” Petitioner was not considered by the FY 2007 Colonel Selection Board. p. Enclosure (15)...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00366-08

    Original file (00366-08.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    After he had submitted his application, he also failed of selection by the FY 2009 Lieutenant Colonel Selection Board. Enclosure (2) is the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps (HQMC) Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB) in Petitioner’s case. In correspondence attached as enclosure (3), the HQMC Officer Counseling and Evaluation Section (NNOA-4) commented to the effect that the PERB action did not support removing Petitioner’s failure of selection by the FY 2008 Lieutenant Colonel...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 06373-06

    Original file (06373-06.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Specifically concerning the contested section K of the fitness report for 2 September 2000 to 5 March 2001, the Board found the mark in section K.3, the second lowest of eight possible marks, did not require marking section K.2 (“Evaluation”) “Do Not Concur [with reporting senior].” The Board substantially concurred with the advisory opinion from MMOA-4 in concluding your selection by the FY 2007 Major Selection Board would have been definitely unlikely, even if the correction directed by...