NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 00003-07
Therefore, the Board concludes that Petitioner should be transferred to the Retired Reserve in the grade of GYSGT. The Board further concludes that this Report of Proceedings should be filed in Petitioner’s naval record so that all future reviewers will understand his status in the Retired Reserve. That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected to show that he transferred to the Retired Reserve in the grade of GYSGT effective on 1 November 2006 vice the discharge of 31 October 2006 now of record.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 00006-07
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was promoted when first eligible.2. The Board, consisting of Ivins, Neuschafer, and Ms Wilcher, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 17 January 2007 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 00008-07
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a commissioned officer in the Marine Corps Reserve, filed an application with this Board requesting that his record be corrected to show that he has 16 qualifying years for reserve retirement so that he would be eligible to request continuation to complete 24 years of commissioned service.2 The Board, consisting of Mr Ms and Ms reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error andinjustice on 19 June 2007 and, pursuant to its regulations,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 00013-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.On 26 March 1953 you enlisted in the Marine Corps Reserve at age 17 and began an extended period of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 00015-07
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS2 NAVY ANNEXWASHINGTON DC 20370-5100DJCDocket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “B” Selective Reenlistment Bonus(SRB).2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Mann, and Mr. Neuschafer, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 00020-07
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that the petitioner elected to participate in the Veteran’s Educational Assistance Program (VEAP) when he was eligible and further corrected to show that he elected to participate in the Montgomery GI Bill (MGIB) Program during the VEAP to MGIB conversion period.2. The Board, consisting of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 00026-07
26-07 10 Mar 08This is in reference to your applicant record pursuant to the provisions of your naval record pursuant to the provisioni of 10 USC 1552 A three—member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, consider10 March 2008. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 00042-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Per reference (a) XXXXX , requests backdate/remedial consideration for promotion to gunnery sergeant by the FY 2004 Gunnery Sergeant Selection Board due to having an inaccurate fitness report removed from his record.2. Paragraph 3602.51 of reference (b) states, when a Marine fails to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 00047-07
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the petitioner’s contract reflect “USN” vice “USNR”.2. 47-07RECOMMENDATION:That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show that:a. The DD Form 4/3, Jan 2001, executed on or about 13 January 2006 is for 6 years under the provisions of the Manpower Personnel, Navy...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 00057-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 July 2007. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. You should note, however, that during the period when your name was on the TDRL, military retired pay entitlements were offset dollar for dollar against...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 00063-07
63-07 21 March 2007From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the NavySubj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICORef: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus(SRB).2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Bourgeois, Mr. Boyd, and Mr. Hicks,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 00065-07
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps dated 2 April 2007, a copy of which is attached, and your rebuttal.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. You requested we provide an advisory opinion on Lance Corporal Martin’s (hereinafter “Applicant”) application, docket #00065-07, to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 00067-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 July 2007. your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 00094-07
Pursuant tQ the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by removing the fitness report for 15 December 2003 to 14 May 2004, a copy of which is in enclosure (1) at Tab A. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.3. In enclosure (3), the HQMC Officer Counseling and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 00099-07
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to Board Certified Pay (BCP).2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Chapman, Leeman, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 24 April 2007 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 00105-07
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected that he was assigned a reentry code of “RE-3 or lower”, and that he did not fail procurement medical or physical standards. b. Petitioner enlisted in the Navy on 26 June 2006. That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected to show that on 27 July 2006, he was discharged by reason of erroneous...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 00112-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memo 1780 Ser 352G/258 of 21 Feb 07, a copy ofwhich is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 00116-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Marine Corps on 28 February 1959 at age 19. Nevertheless, the Board concluded...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 00122-07
122-07 18 January 2007From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the NavySubj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “B” Selective Reenlistment Bonus(SRB).2. The Board, consisting of Ivins, Neuschafer, and Wilcher,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 00132-07
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus(SRB).2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Ms. Gilbert, and Ms. Wilcher, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 13 March 2007 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 00134-07
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was advanced when first eligible.2. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in Petitioner’s application has commented to the effect that the request has merit and warrants favorable action.CONCLUS IONUpon review...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 00137-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 17 June 1943 at age 18. On 28 November 1944, you received a second CM for...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 00141-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error r injustice. This is an advisory memorandum for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 00144-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 January 2008. On 20 December 1973 you received a fifth nonjudicial punishment, for absence from appointed place of duty. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 00148-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted insupport thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps dated 8 February 2007, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 00157-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you enlisted in the Marine Corps on 16 October 1985. You were discharged with...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 00158-07
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDSWASHINGTON DC 2O37O-5100JREDocket No. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice....
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 00159-07
159-07 14 March 2007From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the NavySubj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICORef: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “B” Selective Reenlistment Bonus(SRB).2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Ms. Gilbert, and Ms....
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 00170-07
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show entitlement to the payment of Lump Sum Leave (LSL).2. The Board, consisting of Mr. George, Mr. Koman, and Mr. Rothlein, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 13 February 2007 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 00171-07
The Board, consisting of Messrs. Koman, Neuschafer, and Ms. Humphrey, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 17 April 2007 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in Petitioner’s application has commented to the effect that the request has merit and warrants...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 00173-07
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was advanced when first eligible.2. The Board, consisting of Ivins, Neuschafer, and Ms Wilcher, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 17 January 2007 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 00185-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 10 December 1990 you were notified of pending administrative separation action by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 00187-07
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 JRE Docket No. In the absence of evidence which demonstrates that you were unfit for duty by reason of physical disability that was incurred in or aggravated by your naval service, the Board was unable to recommend corrective action in your case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 00193-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 July 2007. The Board did not consider whether the reason for separation should be changed since you did not request such action and you have not exhausted your administrative remedy by applying to the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB). Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 00198-07
198-07 27 Feb 07From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the NavySubj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICORef: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner is entitled to emergency travel to the Philippines at government expense for the funeral of his brother.2. A copy of this...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 00200-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 July 2007. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support | thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 00202-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Your request for discharge was granted and on 18 August 1970 you received an other than honorable discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trail by court-martial. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 00204-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board also considered the letter from the Deputy Commandant, Manpower and Reserve Affairs, dated 10 January 2007, and the letter from Sergeant Major B---, United States Marine Corps, dated 18 November 2007.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 00208-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 July 2007. Administrative discharge action was initiated by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse. On 17 June 1992 you were so discharged.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 00212-07
212-07 26 Jun 07From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the NavySubj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO, SNRef: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show enlistment in paygrade E-3, vice E-1.2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Rothlein, and Wade, reviewed Petitioner’s...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 00216-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge because of your request for discharge for a lengthy period of UA lasting about six months. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 00218-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 July 2007. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 00226-07
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he was discharged by reason of physical disability.2. The Board, consisting ofandreviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 21 June 2007, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 00232-07
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, herein f er referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corr c ed to remove the Career Status Bonus (CSB)/REDUX election form fro is records.2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Dunn, Mr. Pfeiffer, and Ms. H e d, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 6 N ye er 2007 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 00234-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1430 Ser 8llEY/366 of 27 July 2007, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 00239-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consiste of your application, together with all material submitted in suppor thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In this connection, he Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in the ad isory opinion. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an fficial naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate he existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 00242-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 March 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 00246-07
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEXWASHINGTON DC 20370-5100DJCDocket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “C” Selective Reenlistment Bonus(SRB).2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Ms. Gilbert, and Ms. Wilcher, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 00250-07
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, the widow of a former enlisted member in the Naval Reserve, filed an application with this Board requesting, in effect, that her late husband's (Subject's) naval record be corrected to show that he was eligible for reserve retirement and that he elected spousal coverage under the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP). The corrected record will then show that he completed 20 years of qualifying service in March 2006 and was...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 00252-07
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was entitled to Hostile Fire Pay (HFP) for the month of February 2006.2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Bourgeois, Boyd, and J. Hicks, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 20 March 2007 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective...