Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 00132-07
Original file (00132-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
                           DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
 BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
                                              2 NAVY ANNEX
                                              WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100



 DJC
 Docket No. 132-07
14 March 2007
From:    Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To:      Secretary of the Navy
Subj:    REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO
Ref:     (a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552
End:     (1) DD Form 149 w/attach m ents
 (2) NPC Memo 1160 Ser 4811/091 dtd 22 Feb 07
 (3) Subject’s naval record
1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB).
2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Ms. Gilbert, and Ms. Wilcher, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 13 March 2007 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice, finds as follows:
a.       Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all administrative remedies available under existing law and regulations within the Department of the Navy.
b.       In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in Petitioner’s application has commented to the effect that the request has merit and warrants favorable action.
CONCLUS ION
Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective action.











Docket No. 132-07
RECOMMENDATION:

That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show that:

 a.       The 8 month NAVPERS 1070/621 extension agreement, operative on or about 1 June 2007, is null and void.
b.       The petitioner was discharged and reenlisted on 30 September/i October 2004, vice on or about 31 May/i June 2004. The term is 3 years.
c.       This change will entitle the member to a zone “A” SRB with an award level of 1.0 for the MM rate. Remaining obligated service to 22 November 2004 will be deducted from SRB computation. SRB entitlement from 5 April 2005 to 30 September 2007 will be deducted from SRB computation (Force Conversation (FC) to the DC rate on 5 April 2005).
d.       A copy of this Report of Proceedings will be filed in Petitioner’s naval record.
4.       It is certified that quorum was present at the Board’s review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board’s proceedings in the above entitled matter.


ROBERT D. ZSALMAN        WILLIAM J. HESS, , III
 Recorder         Acting Recorder

 5.       Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e)) and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.



 14 March 2007








2

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 01635-07

    Original file (01635-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “B” and “C” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB).2. 1635-07RECOMMENDATION:That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show that: The 4 year reenlistment executed on or about 14 November 2003 is null and void.b.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 00647-07

    Original file (00647-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus(SRB).2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Bourgeois, Mr. Boyd, and Mr. Hicks, J., reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 20 March 2007 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 00159-07

    Original file (00159-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    159-07 14 March 2007From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the NavySubj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICORef: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “B” Selective Reenlistment Bonus(SRB).2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Ms. Gilbert, and Ms....

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 00981-07

    Original file (00981-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject,. hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus(SRB).2. The Board, consisting of Ms. Ballinger, Mr. Pfeiffer, and Mr. Chapman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 1 May 2007 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 07406-07

    Original file (07406-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “C” Selective Reenlistment Bonus(SRB).2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Zsalman, and Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 17 December 2007 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 00942-07

    Original file (00942-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus(SRB).2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. McBride, and Ms. Hurnberd, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 10 April 2007 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 01331-07

    Original file (01331-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEXWASHINGTON DC 20370-5100DJCDocket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Full Time Support (FTS), Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB).2. The Board, consisting of Ms. Ballinger, Mr. Pfeiffer, and Mr. Chapman, reviewed...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 02528-07

    Original file (02528-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “B” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB).2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Ivins, Ms. Guill, and Ms. McCormick, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 19 June 2007 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 01069-07

    Original file (01069-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB).2. The Board, consisting of Ms. Ballinger, Mr. Pfeiffer, and Mr. Chapman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 1 May 2007 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 00776-07

    Original file (00776-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “C” Selective Reenlistment Bonus(SRB).2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Koman, Mr. Neuschafer, and Ms. Humphrey, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 17 April 2007 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...