NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 02638-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record,. You were released from active duty on 1 September 1976, and transferred to the Naval Reserve.As the available records do not demonstrate that you were unfit to reasonably perform the duties of your rate by reason of physical...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 02640-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient. On 14 June 1973 you were issued a general discharge by reason of unsuitability due to a physical disability.Character of service is based, in part, on conduct and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 02646-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.Prior to your enlistment you signed official documents in which you stated, in part, that you were not...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 02649-06
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 May 2006. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 02655-06
Finally, while the contested report’s late submission is not condoned, the Board was unable to find this invalidated it.In view of the above, your application has been denied. Enclosure • DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYHEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS QUANTICO, VIRGINIA 22i34~5 103 IN REPLY REFER TO: MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OFNAVAL RECORDSSubj: MARINE CORPS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REVIEW BOARD (PERB) ADVISORY OPINION~ON BCNR APPLICATION IN THE CASE OF (a) DD...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 02665-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 19 October 1982 at age 19, You served without disciplinary incident until...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 02667-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 17 July 1950 at age 20. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 02668-06
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) , Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his reenlistment code be changed.2 The Board, consisting of Messrs andreviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 3 October 2006 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Petitioner’s separation performance evaluation for the period...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 02673-06
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 July 2007. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards dated 25 May 2007, a copy of which...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 02706-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered an advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps, a copy of which is enclosed. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 02718-06
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed an application wit~ this Board requesting that his reenlistment code be changed.2. Regulations allow for the assignment of an RE-3G or an RE-4 reenlistment code when an individual is discharged by reason of “condition not a disability”.CONCLUSION:Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record the Board concludes that Petitioner’s request warrants favorable action. The RE-3G...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 02719-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memorandum of 24 Apr 06, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 02754-06
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner made a timely election of the REDUX Retired Pay System and is entitled to a lump sum payment of the Career Status Bonus (CSB) in the amount of $30,000.00.2. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 02756-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. The Board was not persuaded that your cardiovascular disease was the direct result of a combat...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 02757-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board round the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error o in j u t iceYou reenlisted in the Marine Corps on 21 February 1981 after three years of prior honorable service. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 02768-06
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 02782-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You reenlisted in the Navy on 1 April 1987 after three years of prior honorable service. You were...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 02791-06
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on XXXXX - . Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Bo rd found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 02793-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish he existence of probable material error or injustice. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant a change of the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 02804-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO 7220 Ser N130c4/06u0260, 21 April 2006, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 02845-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 22 August 1968 at age 19. Finally, under current standards, a Sailor...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 02852-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinions furnished by CNO memo 7220 N13OD1/Ser 06U0648 of 10 Nov 06, and NMPC m ma 7220 Pers-401l of 24 Jan 07, copies of which are attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 02864-06
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100TJRDocket No: 2864-06 17 October 2006From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the NavySubj: REVIEW OF NAVAL OF RECORDSRef: (a) 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) , Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his reenlistment code be changed.2 The Board, consisting of Messrs and reviewed...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 02895-06
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEXWASHINGTON DC 203705100 TRGDocket No: 2895-061 November 2006From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the NavySubj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OFRef: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code when an individual completes an extended period of active duty and is serving in pay grade E-2. Since he was recommended for advancement and retention in his last...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 02901-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In this connection the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion and the letter from Headquarters Marine Corps.In reaching its decision, the Board believed that a key factor missing in your case is any evidence that you applied for reenlistment through...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 02977-06
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting in effect, that her reenlistment code be changed, a favorable enlisted evaluation be filed in her record, and an extension to an adverse evaluation be removed.2. Petitioner enlisted in the Navy on 20 September 2000.d. The opinion further stated that the extended evaluation was not valid due to numerous errors and the fact that Petitioner separated on...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 02989-06
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show , in effect, that he transferred to the Fleet Reserve pursuant to the Temporary Early Retirement Authority (TERA) effective 1 June 1997, vice being discharged with entitlement to disability severance pay on 19 May 1997. d. DOD Instruction 1332, section E3.P7.2.1.1 provides that members...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 02993-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Per reference (a) and enclosure (1), service named member provided evidence of completed PQS. This is an advisory memorandum for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 02999-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 12 January 2006. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.The Board did not consider whether your reason for separation should be changed, since you did not ask for such action and have not exhausted your...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 03007-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 19 September 2001. After review by the discharge...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 03034-06
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) , Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting a change in his reenlistment code.2 The Board, consisting of Mr,Mr and Mr. reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 7 September 2006 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. On 8 August 2004, Petitioner was honorably discharged from...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 03038-06
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member in the Navy Reserve, filed an application with this Board requesting, in effect, that his record be corrected to show that he completed 20 qualifying years for retirement and then transferred to the Retired Reserve vice being discharged.2. At the end of his anniversary year on 4 October 1982 he was only credited with 26 of the 50 retirement points necessary for another qualifying year. Petitioner points out...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 03106-06
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show enrollment in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) pursuant to the BARBER decision.2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Geisler, Mr. George, and Mr. Wade, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 30 January 2007 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 03122-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You reenlisted in the Navy on 11 September 1981 after two years of prior honorable service. The...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 03128-06
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was entitled to Basic Allowance for Housing (BAH) for designated location of dependents.2. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in Petitioner’s application has commented to the effect that the request has...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 03139-06
You further requested removing your failure of selection by the Fiscal Year (FY) 2007 Active Reserve Lieutenant Colonel Selection Board, on the basis that your record, as it was presented to that promotion board, included the contested original report, it did not include the revised report, and you allege it reflected identical RO marks and comments in the fitness reports for 1 July 2003 to 30 June 2004 and 1 July to 20 December 2004. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 03157-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 25 October 1999 at age 19. During the period from 2 February 2000 to S...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 03159-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Marine Corps on 21 May 1964 at age 17. On 26 April 1967, you received a third NJP...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 03160-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 8 February 1956. You received three nonjudicial...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 03177-06
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memorandums 1430 Ser 48llE9/375, 13 June 2006 and 11 December 2006, a copy of each is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Based on policy and guidelines established in reference (a), enclosure (1) is returned with the following...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 03192-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion from Headquarters Marine Corps, dated 7 June 2006, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 03194-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Marine Corps on 27 August 1968 at age 17. During the period from 27 March 1969 to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 03196-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You reenlisted in the Navy on 14 October 1983 after four years of prior honorable service. On 28...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 03209-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Naval Reserve on 9 February 1944 at .age 17 and began a period of extended active...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 03220-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you entered on active duty on 3 January 1993. You submitted a request for...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 03254-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Marine Corps on 28 February 1969 at age 19. Nevertheless, the Board concluded...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 03259-06
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, hat the applicable naval record be corrected to show enlistment in an advanced paygrade.2. Frankfurt, Geisler, and Leeman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 24 October 2006 and, pursuant t its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 03267-06
The Board noted that, although he was eligible, your deceased husband had never enrolled in the Reserve component Survivor Benefit Plan after becoming eligible for retirement (without pay). They found that he had received ample opportunity to request retired pay and enroll in the Survivor Benefit Plan during the almost 14 years between 8 April 1991 to 18 January 2005. was eligible for retired pay on 8 April 1991.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 03280-06
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show enlistment in an advanced paygrade.2.The Board, consisting of Messrs. Frankfurt, Geisler, and Leeman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice On 24 October 2006 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 03305-06
Under the provisions of that law, your retired pay was computed based on 50% of your base pay, which is the same as if you had completed 20 years of active service. Therefore, your request for entitlement to CRSC was denied by the Navy Council of Review Boards because you did not meet the requirement of 20 years of active service. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...