Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 03305-06
Original file (03305-06.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

 

TRG
Docket No: 3305-06
25 July 2007

 

This is in reference to your application for correction of your
provisions of title 10 of the United

 

States Code section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 17 July 2007. your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations

and policies. »

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material

error or injustice.

The record shows that following your second failure of selection
to the grade of lieutenant colonel, you were retired with 19
years, 5 months and 16 days of active service under the
provisions of a law which has since been repealed. Under the
provisions of that law, your retired pay was computed based on
50% of your base pay, which is the same as if you had completed

20 years of active service.

On 9 April 2004 the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) found
that you are presumptively 20% disabled because of residuals of
prostrate cancer based on your exposure to Agent Orange while in
Vietnam. The payments from the VA were offset against your

retired pay.

The law that established Combat Related Special Compensation
(CRSC) states, as it applies to your case, that eligibility for
CRSC required that you be retired with 20 years of active
service. Therefore, your request for entitlement to CRSC was
denied by the Navy Council of Review Boards because you did not
meet the requirement of 20 years of active service. You then
applied to this Board, contending that the action to retire you

was involuntary and unjust and you should have been retained to
complete 20 years of active service.

Since the law requires 20 years of service, the only way to grant
your request is to correct the record to show that you completed
20 years of active duty. In your case, this action would result
in the payment of more than six months of pay and allowances.
Since you have been treated no differently than many others

retired with less than 20 years, the Board could not find an
error or injustice in your case.

Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.

Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

yom} pe

W. DEAN PFE
Executive Dil r

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 02675-05

    Original file (02675-05.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Sincerely, Enclosure DEPARTI~NT OF THE NAVY SECRETARY OF THE NAVY COUNCIL OF REVIEW BOARDS COMBAT-RELATED SPECIAL COMPENSATION BRANCH 201 12TH STREET SUITE 703 ARLINGTON, VA 22202-4357 iN REPLY REFER 10 1850/I CRSC 15 Mar 2005 Subj: APPROVAL OF CRSC UPON RECONSIDERATION IN THE CASE OF~E~ qflUIIgIpUUIqqU~MUJP~4~ USN DOCKET NUMBER NCO4—00680 Ref: (a) 10 U.S. Code 1413a End: (1) DD Form 149 Application for Correction of Military Record 1. Your application package does not establish that...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00144

    Original file (BC-2007-00144.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPPD states according to the VA Rating Decision dated 2 October 2006, the VA received applicant’s claim for service-connected compensation on 28 July 2005. Therefore, that is the appropriate CRSC effective date for his conditions. The applicant received this notification in the CRSC approval letter, dated 1 November 2006.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120005391

    Original file (20120005391.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    c. VA rating decision, dated 25 November 2011, that shows a special review of the FSM's claims file was mandated by federal court order in Nehmer v. Department of VA. Based on the VA's review of the evidence, they made the following decisions: (1) service connection for coronary artery disease associated with herbicide exposure was granted with a 30% evaluation effective 13 August 1996; (2) an evaluation of 100% was assigned from 13 February 2002 to 14 August 2007; and (3) service connection...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017438

    Original file (20140017438.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    She wants the Army Board for Correction of Military Records to grant CRSC to the estates of deceased veterans. The applicant provides a VA Rating Decision, dated 4 August 2014, wherein it stated VA records indicated the FSM had been granted service-connected disability for ischemic heart disease effective 27 October 2005. However, in order to be granted CRSC, he would have had to submit evidence that conclusively showed his heart disease was incurred by a specific event while engaged in...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00822

    Original file (BC-2007-00822.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His approved CRSC disabilities have a Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) effective date of July 2002 or prior. However, the board is unable to adjust the CRSC effective dates to what the applicant is requesting since his retirement pay was not impacted on the dates he indicated. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120022347

    Original file (20120022347.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The PEB stated that the applicant's PTSD was a result of a mortar attack in Iraq. Qualified military retirees must be an active duty or Reserve retiree with 20 or more years of creditable service or a Title 10 USC Chapter 61 medically retiree, be receiving military retired pay, have a 10 percent or greater VA rating for a combat related injury, and have their military retired pay reduced by receipt...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060011013

    Original file (20060011013.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) rated disability for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) be approved for Combat-Related Special Compensation (CRSC). These kinds of events produce stress in anyone, but not everyone develops PTSD. Without evidence to establish a direct, causal relationship to the applicant’s VA rated disabilities to war or the simulation of war, there is insufficient basis in which to grant his request.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 04972-10

    Original file (04972-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 March 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden jis on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130016725

    Original file (20130016725.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). He indicates he can swear under oath that the patches are a direct result of combat or combat related training. Although the evidence shows the applicant was diagnosed with Degenerative Arthritis of the Spine, Left Spine, Eczema, and Tendon Inflammation Left Shoulder, unfortunately there is no evidence in the available record that shows these conditions were sustained as a direct result of armed...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2004-03265

    Original file (BC-2004-03265.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    Has 20 or more years of active service in the Uniformed Services for the purpose of computing the amount of retired pay, or is entitled to retired pay under section 12731 of Title 10, United States Code, unless such retirement is under section 12731b of that same title. Under CRSC II the first preliminary requirement is that the member has retired with an active duty retirement of 20 years or is a reservist entitled to retirement (20 years of military service) and is at least age 60. ...