NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 04871-06
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show (a) Enlistment Bonus f or Source Rating (EBSR) entitlement and (b) Entitlement to Enlisted Bonus College Credit (EBCC).2. Shy, and Ms. McCormick, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 6 March 2007 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 04878-06
CMC’s decision to include Applicant’s adverse material in her OMPF reflects the fact that the misconduct was substantiated in Applicant’s case. Paragraph 4002 of MCO P5800.16, Marine Corps Manual for Legal Administration (LEGADMINMAN) provides information and guidance concerning reports of officer misconduct; paragraph 4004 of the LEGADMINMAN provides information and guidance concerning formal report of officer nonjudicial punishment (NJP) or disposition of allegations of- misconduct. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 04896-06
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that she elected to participate in the Montgomery GI Bill (MGIB) Program when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Dietrich, and Koman reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 3 October 2006 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 04904-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 22 March 1966 at age 19. Although no disciplinary action was taken for...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 04905-06
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinions from Headquarters Marine Corps dated10 August 2006, with enclosure, and 20 September 2006, copies ofwhich are attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. The reference requests an advisory opinionto correct his record to show that he was promoted to the rank of major prior to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 04907-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted’ in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 18 December 1981 at age 18. On 12 November, 1985 you’ received NJP for...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 04931-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NBC letter 7220 Ser Pers 432/1462 of 12 July 2006, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 04941-06
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 LCC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner submitted a request to extend her entitlement to ship household goods (HHG) at government expense beyond the 1-year period and shipment of HHG via the Do-It-Yourself...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 04951-06
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 2O37Q~51OO BJGDocket No: 4951-0630 October 2006This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.You requested removing the NAVMC (Navy/Marine Corps) HQ [Headquarters]-335 (EF) routing sheet dated 25 November 1998 with enclosures.It is noted that the Headquarters Marine Corps (HQMC) Management Support...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 04955-06
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “B” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for the FC(0000) rate.2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Ms. Gilbert, and Ms. Ballinger, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 11 October 2006 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 04962-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you reenlisted in the Navy on 3 December 1992 after more than five years of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 04978-06
She was medically waived from the Fall 2004 PRT cycle. That all Department of the Navy records pertaining to Petitioner be corrected to show that she was medically waived from participation in all elements of the physical readiness test for the Fall 2005 cycle.b. That any material directed to be removed from Subject’ s naval record be returned to the Board, together with a copy of this Report of Proceedings, for retention in a confidential file maintained for such purpose, with no cross...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05016-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 9 October 1984. After review by the discharge...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05019-06
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was advanced when first eligible.2. Gilbert, Humphrey, and McCormick, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 9 January 2007 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05026-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable -statutes, regulations, and policies. On 11 February 1987, administrative discharge action was initiated to separate you by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05027-06
05027-06 13 November 2006This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 September 2006. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05034-06
OS A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 November 2006. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable -statutes, regulations, and policies. for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05039-06
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 LCC Docket No. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Beckett, Dunn, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 17 October 2006 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures of the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05043-06
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) , Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by removing the service record page lie (“Administrative Remarks (1070)”) entry dated 10 May 2005 (copy in enclosure (1) at Tab A).2. That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected by removing the service record page lie (“Administrative Remarks (1070)”) entry dated 10 May 2005. In view of the above, it is...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05050-06
10 of the United States Code, section 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 September 2006. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05054-06
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show his 20 May 2006 commissioning in the Medical Service Corps was in the grade of lieutenant (pay grade 0-3), vice lieutenant junior grade (pay grade 0-2).2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Cooper, Hess and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 11 January...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05057-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 1 October 1981 at age 17 with parental consent and served without incident...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05060-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. We were asked to provide an advisory opinion on Staff Sergeant request to have his relief for the good of service removed from his OMPF.2. Per the reference and review of the attached OMPF, there is not enough evidence to support the removal of this information.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05066-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Naval Reserve on 29 May 1986 at age 18 and reported for extended active duty on...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05093-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You reenlisted in the Navy on 29 September 1983 at age 21 after a prior period of honorable service. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05094-06
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 SMW Docket No: 5094-06 29 September 2006 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF fo Fee W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05109-06
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 September 2006. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05125-06
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “B” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB).2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Frankfurt, Mr. Geisler, and Mr. Leeman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 24 October 2006 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05131-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 31 August 1999. You were convicted of another...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05134-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Marine Corps on 26 October 1971 at age 17. The Naval Drug Rehabilitation...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05140-06
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinions furnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated 9 September and 6 October 2006, copies of which are attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Official record reviews indicated that member was approved for conversion from the NM rating to GSM rating under the Selective...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05144-06
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected show entitlement to Medical Additional Special Pay (ASP).2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Tew, and Ms. Countryman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 19 September 2006 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05147-06
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, an enlisted member of the Navy, filed an application with this Board requesting that his time in rate (TIR) be adjusted to 1 July 2003.2.The Board, consisting of Mr. Mr. and Ms. , reviewed Petitioner’s allegation of error and injustice on 20 November 2007 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the limited corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Therefore, it recommended that...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05168-06
5168-06 30Jan07From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the NavySubj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICORef: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Geisler, George, and Wade, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 30 January 2007 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Petitioner will be authorized payment of any entitlements that is...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05175-06
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 November 2006. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05178-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the letter furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps (HQMC) dated 25 September 2003, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05181-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps dated 6 June 2006, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05182-06
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 November 2006. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. In addition, the Board considered the comments furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps (HQMC)...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05186-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05188-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05193-06
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinions furnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated 9 September and 6 October 2006, copies of which are attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. The member’s statement and the reporting senior’s endorsement are both included in the member’s record.b. The reporting senior’s first...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05195-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 30 November 2005. However, applicable regulations...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05205-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps dated 8 June 2006, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05209-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Branch, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05213-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Furthermore, concerning your contention that you only had one offense, the record shows that you had one civil conviction and an NJP for two offenses. The Board also noted that you could have been discharged by reason of misconduct due to civil conviction.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05214-06
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) , Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the United States Marine Corps, applied to this Board requesting an RE-3 reenlistment code vice the RE-4 reenlistment code actually assigned on 29 April 2005.2. The Board, consisting of Mr. , Mr. and Mr. reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 27 September 2006, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05221-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps dated 1 June 2006, a copy of which is attached, and your rebuttal statement.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05225-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your Naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found you enlisted in the Marine Corps on 4 October 1978 at age 17. On 25 July 1980 your...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05227-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.On 19 May 1980 you reenlisted in the Navy at age 21 after a prior period of honorable service. On 26...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05232-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 28 July 1999. The punishment imposed consisted of...