NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 09494-05
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 May 2005. On 3 April 1985, administrative discharge action was initiated to separate you by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 09505-05
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 May 2006. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 09514-05
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 May 2006. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 09515-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 9 December 1992 at age 21. At that time, you were not recommended for...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 09516-05
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 May 2006. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge because of your misconduct that resulted in five NJP’s and especially your request for discharge to avoid trial for a serious offence. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 09520-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Marine Corps on 11 April 1972 at age 17. After review, the discharge authority...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 09527-05
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) , Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed an application with this Board requesting a change in his reenlistment code.2 The Board, consisting of Mr Mr reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 29 August 2006 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected by issuing a DD Form 215...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 09535-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Per reference (a) and (b), we have reviewed XXXXX requests to seek formal PME enrollment to be competitive for colonel, remedial promotion consideration, and retroactive active duty credit from 2000-2004. Therefore his request to return to active duty was denied at that time.R.F.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 09559-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 25 October 2001. After review by the discharge...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 09574-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You reenlisted in the Marine Corps Reserve on 30 September 1980 following about an 11 month period...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 09577-05
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he reenlisted and was advanced under the provisions of the Selective Training and Reenlistment (STAR) program.2. The Board, consisting of reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice 28 February 2006 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 09584-05
Docttmentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable ~tatutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Army on 23 July 1968 and served on active duty until you were honorably...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 09586-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. A minimum average mark of 4.0 in conduct was required at the time of your separation for a fully honorable characterization of service. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 09606-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 10 June 2002. The offenses included an...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 09621-05
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to the Selective Training and Reenlistment (STAR) program upon completion of training.2 The Board consisting ofreviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 09655-05
After review by the discharge authority, the recommendation for separation was approved and on 15 October 1992 you received an other than honorable discharge by reason of misconduct. Applicable regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code when an individual is discharged due to misconduct. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 09661-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 24 January 1961 at age 17. After review, the separation authority...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 09674-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy Reserve on 14 January 1986. After review by the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 09678-05
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS2 NAVY ANNEXWASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 SJNDocket No: 09678-0512 September 2006From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the NavySubj REVIEW NAVAL OF RECORDRef: (a) 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) , Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting a change in his reenlistment code.2 The Board consisting reviewed Petitioner’s allegations...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 09689-05
The Board, having Based on reference (a) and the BRIMS database recommend the member’s evaluation should be revised to P/WS “Passed/Within Standards” in Block 20. The member alleges an administrative error occurred and requests the report be corrected and changed from ‘PINS’ to reflect a ‘P/WS’ in block 20, Physical Readiness.b.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 09709-05
9709-05 28 February 2006This is in reference to your application for correction of your deceased former spouse’s naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10USC 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 February 2006. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your former spouse’s naval record and applicable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 09717-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you enlisted in the Marine Corps on 14 August 1967. Nevertheless, the Board...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 09732-05
9732-05 8 Mar 06This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 Usc 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 March 2006. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 09738-05
in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 28 August 1978 at age 18. During the period from 26 January 1979 to 17 February 1982, you received four nonjudicial punishments. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 09769-05
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 28 September 2005 at age 19. Based on your actions while in recruit training, the history you provided, and the psychological testing, you were diagnosed with a narcissistic personality disorder with antisocial traits.Consequently you were processed for an...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 09771-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted s insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you enlisted in the Marine Corps on 12 March 1984. The record clearly shows...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 09787-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 1 June 2001. Since you have been treated no...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 09828-05
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)”) counseling entry dated 26 October 2005 (copy in enclosure (2)) and the fitness report for 25 August to 26 October 2003 (copy at Tab A).2. In enclosure (2), the Headquarters Marine Corps (HQMC) Manpower Information Operations, Manpower...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 09829-05
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, Subject's brother-in-law and conservator of her estate, filed an application with this Board requesting a better characterization of service then the undesirable discharge issued on 28 October 1964. After review, the discharge authority directed an undesirable discharge by reason of unfitness and she was so discharged on 28 October 1964, d. Reference (b) sets forth the Department of the Defense's current polices, standards and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 09849-05
09849-05 11 September 2006This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 September 2006. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 09851-05
Docket No: 9851-0510 May 2006 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, an enlisted member of the Naval Reserve, filed an application with this Board requesting that the reenlistment code from a former enlistment be changed. Therefore, the Board concludes that no useful purpose is now served by the 1998 RE-4 reenlistment code and a correction to the record is...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 09865-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 22 February 2001 at age 21. After review, thisrecommendation was...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 09911-05
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application o 1 February 2007. In addition, the Board confirmed its prior decision of 16 May 2005, that you have not demonstrated the existence of material error or injustice in connection with your bad conduct discharge. Consequently, hen applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 09954-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 19 July 2005. Subsequently, on 30 August 2005 you...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 09961-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NRC memorandum 1133 Ser N5312/09049 of 1 August 2006, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 09972-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Naval Reserve on 9 February 1989 at age 20 and reported for three years of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 09985-05
Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF FORMER Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner applied to this Board requesting that his naval record be corrected to show, in effect, that she was discharged from the Navy for a reason other than fraudulent or erroneous enlistment. Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, the Board concludes that the available records are insufficient to show that Petitioner procured her enlistment fraudulently by failing to disclose a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 10036-05
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 February 2007. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 10047-05
10047-05 28 FEB 06From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the NavySubj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICORef: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Full Time Support (FTS) Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for the BM rating.2. The reenlistment...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 10060-05
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject former spouse, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show timely written conversion from spouse to former spouse coverage under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP)2 The Board consisting of reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error injustice on 28 February 2006 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 10131-05
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected that she was discharged reason of physical disability rather than misconduct. Her request was approved by the discharge authority, and she was separated from the Marine Corps on 3 December 1984, for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial, with a discharge under other...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 10137-05
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100TRG Docket No: 10137-05 28 March 2007 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF ggasi Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.c. At that time, he was not recommended for reenlistment and was assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code. The Board further concludes that this Report of Proceedings should be filed in Petitioner's naval record so that all...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 10150-05
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 February 2007. As a discharge by reason of misconduct takes precedence over disability processing, and as there is no indication in the available records that you were unfit for duty by reason of physical disability at the time of your discharge, the Board was unable to recommend any corrective action in your case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 10164-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The record shows that you enlisted in the Naval Reserve on 17 September 1940 and were appointed a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 10188-05
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 February 2007. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 10202-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board also considered your rebuttal letter dated 31 December 2005.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 10223-05
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100BJGDocket No:10223-0516 April 2007This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.You requested, in effect, that the fitness report for 1 October 2000 to 31 May 2001 be modified, in accordance with the reporting senior’s (RS’s) letter dated 3 January 2005, by raising the marks in sections...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 10244-05
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone ‘A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for the EN rating.2. The Board, consisting of reviewed Petitioner’s allegation of error and injustice February 2006 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 10281-05
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Naval Reserve, filed an application with this Board requesting changes in the reason for discharge and reenlistment code.2. At the expiration of his initial eight year enlistment, the unsigned 24 month extension was made operative changing his Expiration of Service (EOS) from 12 April 2004 to 12 April 2006.The lack of signature by (Petitioner) indicates the 24 month extension of enlistment was prepared...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 10307-05
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100TRG Docket No: 10307-05 30 March 2007 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF @ Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed an application with this Board requesting reinstatement in the Navy or a change in his reenlistment code. That...